The 650SS

I sent the post above to my friend Tony who is busy restoring this very model and year. He is a Yamaha sales rep, has owned and ridden Vincents for decades, still has a nice Rapide and Comet, but has always craved a Featherbed Norton.
We are hoping to ride to the INOA Rally this summer on our Nortons.

The Newby clutch went into the 650SS yesterday, what a clever contraption that is. The old AMC clutch was donated to Tony for the 99. It had a new basket, sprocket, cush rubbers, bearings, plates and springs but wasn't quite man enough for the 650.
Herb Becker insists that the clutch did not slip until he reshaped the inlet trac.
14 solid Days of Sunshine on the way, time to renew the collector multivehicle plate and run this bike some. It will be nice to see what it can do with a good clutch in there. Might wire up a plug in for the heated vest, temps are only going to a high of around 40 f or so.

Glen
 
The 650SS

Here is my 63 ex Queensland Police bike 650SS I purchased in 87, I bought it from the brother of the guy who purchased it at Police auction, it was never ridden after auction until I bought and restored it, did a 5000 mile trip on it to southern Australia, never missed a beat except having to lay it down coz a caravan towing moron had his indicators connected assabout on his trailer, but after about 2 hrs I was back on the road , my lawyer pursued the moron and reimbursed me the damage.
 
no, cant remember who I sold it to, no doubt I sold it to finance the next project,
 
worntorn said:
One bike that scorched around the IOM was a direct ancestor to the 650ss. This was the little 500 twin that Doug Hele prepared, the one that became the first pushrod machine to lap the IOM at over 100mph. Hele used the downdraught head design of that bike for the new 650, that is were much of the extra power came in. Glen

Norton was despatching the 650 Manxman with it's downdraught head at the beginning of November 1960, so I would say that the Domiracer was the offspring of the Norton 650.

An old racer in the U.K. has a lowboy Domiracer which he has had since the 60s. It has a plain finished frame, not nickel, with no numbers on it. He has the bucket-tappet cam and the special head with it's eccentric rocker adjusters for the bike. He also has the "handed" Amal Gps and a set of the all-alloy short rods for use with the short nikasil cylinder, which have 650-size big-ends. It is the most complete lowboy Domiracer I know of with the most development parts and it has a history back to the 60s, the only such survivor I know of. It's present owner got parts right from Paul Dunstall back in the day.

Back to the 650ss. All I have left to do on my 62' to get it on the road is put the wiring back in. It will be all stock except for maybe a conversion to 12 volts. I have the stock compressioin, x1 cam, standard bore, head untouched except for a very light valve job, stock springs and original size carbs with the original sleeves still in the inlet ports. Also stock exhaust and it is running Avon Speedmaster/SM tires on the front and back as might have in the early 60s. So it should perform very close to the way they did 50 years ago, and very close to the way a stock Norton Manxman would. I will be glad to wring it out this spring and summer.

I rode a stone stock Manxman for many years, and it is still being ridden by the guy I sold it to with 20K miles on it's original cylinders, rods and pistons. John Gregory, builder of the Hogslayer Norton drag-bike which T.C. Christenson won fame on, said there was nothing wrong with the early 650/750 rods as long as the rod bolts were torqued properly, he used them in nitro-burning drag engines.

A former Norton factory employee said that the works put two complete lowboy twins together for their use. Also Rudi Thalhammer was supplied with a works twin roadracer. A few racers with Manx frames and 650 engines were put together for Luigi Taveri and Derek Minter to ride. Three works 500 twin roadracers were sent to the USA early in 1962 for distributor Berliner to use in AMA road-racing. Per AMA rules they had to be built around a production featherbed frame and off-the-shelf engine castings along with a kick-start mechanism just as the Daytona Manx Norton's had to have.

Heinz Kegler worked at the Norton experimental department from the late 50s through 1962 and was at the IOM to see the Domiracer do it's thing. He also had a 650ss development bike that was his to test that had a lot of tweaks which were meant to go into the production bike. Unfortunately when AMC shut down the works at the end of 62' the performance tweaks were lost. Heinz' 650ss had a bit hotter cam with radius lifters, 10:1 pistons and 1 1/8" monoblocs among other tweaks. He said the bike was tested at MIRA at over 125mph, and he said he had it going 200km/hr on the open road.

The 750 Norton came out for sale in the USA during 1962 and the Atlas scrambler in 1963 and the 650 was no longer a priority in the USA and that seriously cut the demand and sales of them afterwards. There are quite a few of the blue 650 Manxman bikes in the USA in various states of disrepair, and a few original and restored ones. There is also a fair number of 1962 650ss bikes in the USA, which was were most of Norton's "flagship" production went. 650ss USA imports for 1963 and later were very low. 1963 Production was very low because AMC was moving production. For some reason the 650ss kept it's small carburetors and inlet sleeves for all production except it's last year, when suddenly it was given 930 Concentrics. The 650 Mercury and it's single carburetor of the late 60s was an oddball bike which for some reason superseded the 650ss and was sold in the USA through the end of the 60s.

Functionally there is no difference between the 650 and 750 Norton engine except for the smaller cylinder bore, inlet sleeves and valves of the 650. With identical parts there is no reason the 650 should not put out close to the same power per CC as any other Norton engine. Early Triumph Bonnevilles had the same bore-size 376 Amal monoblocs as the early 650ss had, but got bigger carbs and more development than the 650ss in later years. I am sure the two are very close in performance in a straight line and the one that is in better tune would probably win the day. Of course in the twisty stuff I would rather be on the Norton.
 
beng said:
worntorn said:
One bike that scorched around the IOM was a direct ancestor to the 650ss. This was the little 500 twin that Doug Hele prepared, the one that became the first pushrod machine to lap the IOM at over 100mph. Hele used the downdraught head design of that bike for the new 650, that is were much of the extra power came in. Glen

Norton was despatching the 650 Manxman with it's downdraught head at the beginning of November 1960, so I would say that the Domiracer was the offspring of the Norton 650.

An old racer in the U.K. has a lowboy Domiracer which he has had since the 60s. It has a plain finished frame, not nickel, with no numbers on it. He has the bucket-tappet cam and the special head with it's eccentric rocker adjusters for the bike. He also has the "handed" Amal Gps and a set of the all-alloy short rods for use with the short nikasil cylinder, which have 650-size big-ends. It is the most complete lowboy Domiracer I know of with the most development parts and it has a history back to the 60s, the only such survivor I know of. It's present owner got parts right from Paul Dunstall back in the day.


Any chance of a pic of the cylinder head with a view of the eccentric rocker adjusters setup :?:
I would love to see a compe pic of the bike too, as i have never seen one with the orginal Domiracer engine
 
beng said:
...original sleeves still in the inlet ports

Beng, I can't quite visualise what you mean by 'sleeves'. Do you have a photo?

You mention low production numbers. Can you estimate how many 650SSs were made? In the order of a few hundred a year, perhaps?

Very interesting post, thanks.
 
Here is a photo of an early SS head and the sleeves the ports had to make them 1 1/16". Also showing the satin-chrome fastners and intake rocker cover breather-banjo that was on the Bracebridge-Street 650 Nortons.

The old Lowboy Domiracer my acquaintance has, has been sitting in a shed for decades, but the owner has recently been inspired to put it back together so it may see light again in the near future. I was given permission to put photos of some of it's parts up here: http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set= ... 123&type=3

The 650SS
 
beng said:
Here is a photo of an early SS head and the sleeves the ports had to make them 1 1/16". Also showing the satin-chrome fastners and intake rocker cover breather-banjo that was on the Bracebridge-Street 650 Nortons.

The old Lowboy Domiracer my acquaintance has, has been sitting in a shed for decades, but the owner has recently been inspired to put it back together so it may see light again in the near future. I was given permission to put photos of some of it's parts up here: http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set= ... 123&type=3 quote]

Thanks for posting access to the Domiracer, I can now see how the eccentric rocker adjusters setup fits in the cylinder head.
Do you know if they just threaded directly into the head or did they use some kind of heli coil :?:
 
'Under full acceleration the change up speeds were 49, 72, and 98mph-impressive stuff'. I've gotta get me a 62' 650SS!!!
 
Snorton74 said:
'Under full acceleration the change up speeds were 49, 72, and 98mph-impressive stuff'. I've gotta get me a 62' 650SS!!!

Oddly enough, those are within 1 or 2 mph of the speeds quoted in Atlas road tests too.
And one of those road tests shows a bike with high handlebars....

Wonder if those numbers are what was quoted in the press kits.
Or at max (quoted) rpms....
 
Under full acceleration. Test was done by Motor Industry Research Association. 105.2 against the wind, 119.5 with it.
 
In the "Dominator Performance Portfolio" booklet (republished roadtests) about 7 or 8 dommie tests, over a few years, all quote numbers highly similar to those numbers you quote.

Several tests note that those are speeds at max rpm in that gear.
Be a perfect rider than can change gear at EXACTLY max rpm in each gear .... ?
Especially since some of those bikes didn't come fitted with a tacho !!
 
Geoff Duke? There's a good article in the current Classic Bike Guide on the 650SS. It notes that Read and Setchell dominated on the Syd Lawton tuned 650SS thru 64'. Maybe they tested as well? Too bad Norton didn't make more of them.
 
I seem to remember that my friends 650 manxman cost about 30 pounds more than a bonneville which was probably a couple of hundred pounds back the n. It was very impressive in performance, and didn't rattle or leak oil. It had a twin carb head, which was rare in Nortons in those days, I think it was the first of their road bikes to have that. I think the guy who had the dealership in Melbourne might have added the 30 pounds . He used to 'make every post a winning post'. When he sold the Atlas, the thing fell into a hole, when the cylinder base flanges broke off his bikes. These days in our historic racing we have plenty of Atlases, they all came from nowhere .
 
There was an optional twin carb manifold to suit Nortons in the late 1950s.
Hidden in the small print somewhere there.
The Nomad model got them as standard.

All Manxmans were exported to the USA, in the factory records ?
It was a USA model, after all.
Not that there were that many of them.

But we diverge from 650SS models.
(There was a single carb Standard 650 Model too, which folks seem to forget)
 
Snorton74 said:
Geoff Duke? .

Even Geoff Duke (who no longer rode for Nortons by the 1960s ) couldn't change gear at EXACTLY redline 7000 rpm every gearchange.
Without a tacho fitted....

You'd rather suspect these figures are just quoting what was in the press kit - max speed at redline in each gear.
Not what it would actually do...
 
I don't believe the domiracer would be as good a package as the manx of the same year. It is very difficult to get a bike with a twin cylinder motor, to inspire the same level of confidence. I once rode a good 1961 30M, and I've also ridden a very fast 650 Triumph Triton which was set up for torque rather than top end . The Triumph was good, but the Norton was a better package. The manx made my own short stroke 500cc Triumph look stupid. Nobody needs that sort of anxiety.
 
acotrel said:
I don't believe the domiracer would be as good a package as the manx of the same year. .

For any rational reason, or did this off-topic rant come out of thin air ?!

The Domiracer came 3rd in the 61 TT, on its 1st TT outing. The Manx wasn't far ahead.
And the Domiracer had lost a 1000 revs (was it ?)(pushrods ?), and had a rubbing rear tyre.

Plenty of potential there, as any intelligent assessment would suggest.
The FACTORY 650 racer had some ding-dong battles with Dunstalls 650 effort, as was detailed elsewhere.
The closure of Bracebridge St and the move to Plumstead Road terminated these developments. And the Manx....

Not Dunstalls race efforts though. This a road bike (?).

The 650SS
 
So's This . :?

The 650SS


Theres Domiracers , & Domiracers .

The 650SS


The ' Lowboy ' frame cant of been to bad , even these winkers copied it .

The 650SS
 
Back
Top