Are we talking Buell or Norton, here? If it's a Norton, I go along with Dave. No ethanol. Although, in most cases, that's a bit impractical. Non-ethanol not being a practical solution, my second choice would be a metal tank. Preferably aluminum. The steel tank reproductions are plentiful and relatively cheap when compared to an aluminum tank. These would be the only choices for me. As for lining a fiberglass tank, based upon the experiences posted on this site, I'd be inclined to say no. If it were just a case of the lining separating it wouldn't be a big deal. Unfortunately, the goop used to line tanks has the propensity to mix with the fuel and really gum up the works. There's a post from Jim Comstock (comnoz) that tells of some pretty expensive damage to the engine from tank liners. Some have reported good results. My take is that the tank liner applications are subject to too many variables to always have a proper result. Anyway, do a search here and make your own choice. I, personally, think it's a bit like the old Fram ad. "You can pay me now or pay me later". I've always found that it's a lot cheaper to do things right the first time, regardlees of the cost. It's usually been a hell of a lot more expensive to do it over.