Parts vs Bike

rvich said:

pkeithkelly said:

Going with the them of the title of this original post - what does this photo show?

Parts or a future bike?

PS - there are no wrong answers.

Click to expand...

It isn't missing much, so I think it is a bike. It probably ran before it was taken apart.

Click to expand...

i once was looking at an old MGB GT a few years ago- the guy selling it told me it ran good before they took the motor out - and was serious about it -haha -

pkiethkelly---I see a bike....what's wrong with me I wonder...the glass is half full !!

Stephen...get a featherbed and mount the Eng/gr bx Isolastic style..there is a good article if you google featherbed commando didn't see the isolastic mounts on that one,but it looks like it flys !! there are others out there. also seeley. Cj

pkeithkelly said:

Going with the them of the title of this original post - what does this photo show? Parts or a future bike?

Click to expand...

Definitely a future bike.

(not fair, as i recall you posting this before)

...of course, the then future bike ended up costing more than buying a nearly complete roller, I'll bet...

pkiethkelly, I think you should just keep it as it is . If you put a leaky engine and gearbox in that frame, it'd make a mess of those nice tiles in no time....

Stephen Hill