New Frame for 1974 Norton MkII

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Apr 19, 2013
Messages
5
Country flag
I would like a new frame for my 1974 MkII project. Does anyone make a really good (straight) and light (either 4130 or Reynolds 531) isolastic frame with good looking welds? Failing this, does anyone know who is the best at straightening out the original frame?
 
If all else fails you could go for a stock unit from Andover:

NORTON 850 - 1974

Item: MAIN FRAME ASSY. (NOT MKIII) 064140
Part Number: 065404
Price: £825.00
 
I have a spare '75 frame, I intended to do much more than I have with my Mk2A. It is clean, straight, and available. Let me know, Kent
 
I have a restored 850 frame for sale. Has been basted to bare metal, primered and epoxy paint. Contact via PM if interested.
 
gmmurphy said:
I would like a new frame for my 1974 MkII project. Does anyone make a really good (straight) and light (either 4130 or Reynolds 531) isolastic frame with good looking welds? Failing this, does anyone know who is the best at straightening out the original frame?

You might get a better response if you indicated where in the world you are.... :wink:
 
Reynolds 531 is long gone, 631 is now the better equivalent. Really got to ask how much lighter you expect the frame to be!! the Commando frame is very light as it is.
 
I'm sure the original frames are fine. However, I read somewhere that the later Italian-made frames were heavier or made of less desirable metal. I don't know the truth of this, but I am just wondering if anyone currently makes a frame of superior tubing and with really good alignment.

My current frame seems to have bent front tank mounting ears (the right one is bent up and the left one down) and a slightly bent head-tube-mounted triple-tree stop, so I suspect there may be other alignment issues. After reading "The Worlds Straightest Commando" article at http://vintagenet.us/phantom/wsc.html I realized how important proper alignment is for the isolastic frame.
 
gmmurphy said:
I'm sure the original frames are fine. However, I read somewhere that the later Italian-made frames were heavier or made of less desirable metal. I don't know the truth of this,

The Italian frame maker was (later) named as Verlicchi, and if there was any 'fault' with the metal we are yet to hear of it here ?

It was said to be sized in metric, as compared to the Reynolds made frames which were inch sized = very fractionally different in places.
Just looking at them, there is no obvious way to distinguish between the makers, so this suggests they are about equivalent.

It was claimed that the frames varied in dimensions in places, which required 'corrective' action,
but this may be nothing else than sour grapes.

For mere road use, there is nothing superior about better grades of steel tubing, other than bragging rights ?
Commandos also have very little history of breaking frame tubes, surely a serious benefit of just using mild steel tubing...
 
Thanks for the information about the Italian frames. With that info in mind, perhaps I will focus more on finding someone who can repair and align my frame.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top