grandpaul said:No offense taken. I am what I am and that's that.
yep a second grade HACK that will some day get some one hurt with your sorely lacking skills.
grandpaul said:No offense taken. I am what I am and that's that.
Carbonfibre said:In the US if there were a serious accident that could be linked in any way to poor standards of workmanship, would it not result in legal action, and in most cases the end of the business activities of those involved?
JimC said:Loctite has its place, but definitely NOT on the head fasteners.
he is sorely lacking in technical knowledge and common knowledge of commando's along with fabrication skills to be doing this as a business. trust me on this as I had to rebuild a former clients bike. wrong bearings in both wheel's, wrong nut on front axle, loose parts in the primary drive are just 3 thing's I found.Carbonfibre said:as notwithstanding his apparent lack of technical knowledge, it may well be that his workmanship is top notch,
Paul, While you are getting shite from bill, Milling away the oil weir? Well give me the reason, i allways guessed the weir was to keep just enough oil in the sump for the flywheel to "Just lick" oil up and throw it onto the cam, with out the weir the oil is below the crank pickup level? am i right or wrong?grandpaul said:Took the cases to my knifemaker friend Enrique's machine shop to mill away the oil wier. He got it all set up and started on it-
![]()
Next thing you know, he backed off and said "you've seen how to do, now YOU do it"-
![]()
Not quite a mirror-finish job, but perfectly acceptable for the intended purpose-
![]()
john robert bould said:i allways guessed the weir was to keep just enough oil in the sump for the flywheel to "Just lick" oil up and throw it onto the cam, with out the weir the oil is below the crank pickup level? am i right or wrong?
john robert bould said:Paul, While you are getting shite from bill, Milling away the oil weir? Well give me the reason, i allways guessed the weir was to keep just enough oil in the sump for the flywheel to "Just lick" oil up and throw it onto the cam, with out the weir the oil is below the crank pickup level? am i right or wrong?grandpaul said:Took the cases to my knifemaker friend Enrique's machine shop to mill away the oil wier. He got it all set up and started on it-
![]()
Next thing you know, he backed off and said "you've seen how to do, now YOU do it"-
![]()
Not quite a mirror-finish job, but perfectly acceptable for the intended purpose-
![]()
look here on the weirJeandr said:john robert bould said:i allways guessed the weir was to keep just enough oil in the sump for the flywheel to "Just lick" oil up and throw it onto the cam, with out the weir the oil is below the crank pickup level? am i right or wrong?
I think the weir is one of the factory's experiments in making a good breather, with the combat having the breather on the back of the flywheel, a lot of oil is thrown back and without the weir, too much oil was probably being sent back to the oil tank through the breather rather than through the pump and filter (was there one on the combat??) At any rate it is clear it wasn't working right or they would have kept it for all the other engines built after the combat.
Jean
bill said:look here on the weir
new-product-t10721-60.html#p124803
it was not just the 72-73 750 case's but you are correct on the rear breather caes's. if you remove the weir it most assuredly will try to push oil up the breather if you use it. GP NEVER did answer me as to how he did the breather on this build but IF he is using both it is a mistake and if it is only the one on the rear of the timing chest it will not work either. I will let you guess why from the picture
matt-combat-commando-overhaul-grandpaul-t9868-60.html#p118275
pvisseriii said:The "Weir" (or what ever the f you want to call it) may have had an intention but I would really like to see where it is written (other than here) that the crank was designed as a oil flinger for the cam.
I gotta say, I may not be happy with all of GP's descions, but you stone flingers appear to be living in glass houses. And for the love of god, pull your pants up, we can see your ignorance, intolerance and jeolousy.
Peter
Carbonfibre said:One wonders how many users of this forum have had restoration work carried out by GP though, as notwithstanding his apparent lack of technical knowledge, it may well be that his workmanship is top notch, and he certainly shouldnt be condemned for making a few silly errors?
pvisseriii said:The "Weir" (or what ever the f you want to call it) may have had an intention but I would really like to see where it is written (other than here) that the crank was designed as a oil flinger for the cam.
I gotta say, I may not be happy with all of GP's descions, but you stone flingers appear to be living in glass houses. And for the love of god, pull your pants up, we can see your ignorance, intolerance and jeolousy.
Peter
pvisseriii said:pvisseriii said:The "Weir" (or what ever the f you want to call it) may have had an intention but I would really like to see where it is written (other than here) that the crank was designed as a oil flinger for the cam.
I gotta say, I may not be happy with all of GP's descions, but you stone flingers appear to be living in glass houses. And for the love of god, pull your pants up, we can see your ignorance, intolerance and jeolousy.
Peter
I wrote this for 2 reasons.
1. i want to know what the "weir" is really intended to be there for "officially".
2. The negativity of some posters just gets old, not necessarilly you, bill, and I felt to come to the defence of a fellow forum member.
That being said, from the increasing consensus and due to the fact that I was reneged on for a purchase he was making, I guess I'll say "Let the Flames fly".
And please excuse me for and ignorance, intolerance and jeolousy I may display.