lcrken
VIP MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2009
- Messages
- 5,064
We've seen a lot of posts here about isolastic bikes vs. solid mount bikes, with plenty of comments on how terrible the isolastics are for handling. My experiences on the race track with Commandos are that they handle just fine, when properly set up. In defense of them, I thought I'd point out a couple things that seem to have been ignored in these discussions.
All the factory race bikes with Commando engines that I know about had isolastic mounts, including the John Player F750 bikes. That includes the early tube frame racers, the monocoque bikes, and the final tube space frames. They were quite successful racers for the time, given how underpowered they were. Between them they set fast lap times in races, including the IOM, set some lap records, and won plenty of races. They were generally regarded as much better handling than their competitors, but at a serious horsepower disadvantage.
Peter Williams claimed that the monocoque Norton was the best handling bike he'd ever raced. Pretty strong praise for an isolastic bike from a reliable source.
Just to be really clear, I'm not trying to say that a Commando racer handles any better than a good solid mount frame, be it featherbed, Seeley, Rickman, or whatever. But I think they can be made to handle just as well, although they definitely have a different feel to them. The primary benefit I see for a solid mount frame is their weight advantage. Most Commando framed racers are at a significant weight disadvantage to a bike like Kenny Cummings Seeley replica.
Ken
All the factory race bikes with Commando engines that I know about had isolastic mounts, including the John Player F750 bikes. That includes the early tube frame racers, the monocoque bikes, and the final tube space frames. They were quite successful racers for the time, given how underpowered they were. Between them they set fast lap times in races, including the IOM, set some lap records, and won plenty of races. They were generally regarded as much better handling than their competitors, but at a serious horsepower disadvantage.
Peter Williams claimed that the monocoque Norton was the best handling bike he'd ever raced. Pretty strong praise for an isolastic bike from a reliable source.
Just to be really clear, I'm not trying to say that a Commando racer handles any better than a good solid mount frame, be it featherbed, Seeley, Rickman, or whatever. But I think they can be made to handle just as well, although they definitely have a different feel to them. The primary benefit I see for a solid mount frame is their weight advantage. Most Commando framed racers are at a significant weight disadvantage to a bike like Kenny Cummings Seeley replica.
Ken