Is anyone running ContiClassicAttacks

I would like to run a set of ContiClassicAttacks on my 73 interstate. Is anyone running them on a Commando now?

I'm not but also have a '73 Interstate so I'm definitely interested in these tires, maybe enough to get new rims....anyway per Conti's website the various 19" models spec a minimum rim width of WM3, 2.15" and stock Commando rims are are WM2, 1.85"

http://www.continental-tires.com/motorc ... ssicattack

It is always a Commando topic to mount the 100/90 on a 1.85 rim. But Avon and AN recommend this tire size. I am runnning the 100/90 on my Commando for years wihout any problems. I didn't ride the Conti myself but I heard from some Commando riders that they were very happy with it. It should last very long and be good in the bends. It is a good tire of course, but all recommendations are subjective opinions. You have to check it out yourself.

Fitted Classic Attacks 700 miles ago on my 1977 mk3 19" rims WM2 front/WM3 rear - they have excellent grip, no tramlining and the wobble I used to get on decelerating at about 30 to 40mph has gone. I was running on TT100s & the Contis are a big improvement - I have never tried Avons. The Contis are narrower and not so tall as the TT100 - I do seem to get blown about a bit more when it is very windy.

regental said:

Fitted Classic Attacks 700 miles ago on my 1977 mk3 19" rims WM2 front/WM3 rear - they have excellent grip, no tramlining and the wobble I used to get on decelerating at about 30 to 40mph has gone. I was running on TT100s & the Contis are a big improvement - I have never tried Avons. The Contis are narrower and not so tall as the TT100 - I do seem to get blown about a bit more when it is very windy.

Click to expand...

What is the size of the tires front and rear? Is the rear wheel 18 or 19 inch?

In my case, I won't get a chance to actually ride on my new Conti Classic Attack's until next spring / summer, but I have the front mounted and will mount the rear as soon as I finish truing up the new Madass rear wheel assembly. I can't wait to try out the technology that's built into these tires. The front is a 100/90-19 on a Borrani WM3 (2.15) and the rear is a 110/90-18 for a Borrani WM3 (2.15). The tires have a rather modern look to the tread pattern and I suppose they could look a little out of place if a vintage appearance is important to you. I did notice when mounting the front, it seemd quite stiff when levering the beads on. I was very glad I was using my new "Stubby" levers. One word of warning, not all the sizes Continental shows on the Classic Attack web page are available in the U.S. Best to make sure the size you plan on using is actually in stock somewhere. I had just ordered a 19" Borrani rear from Buchanan's when I discovered the 19" Classic Attack rear tire I wanted wouldn't be available for a year or so. Luckily, Buchanan's hadn't started drilling any holes yet, and I switched to the 18" rim.
Bill

If I was riding on the track I might be interested, along with suspension upgrade and improved ground clearance. But I reckon if someone can ride the TT at an average of 100mph on Dunlop old stylie rubber compounds then I am happy enough on the roads with the same tyre with modern material. I like the 3.60 and 4.10 mix, I know the rear flattens in the centre with mileage, which then makes it a bit twitchy, but it's not something that bothers me too much. For the avoidance of doubt I am referring to TT100's. Plus they just look right on a 70's bike. Just my view of course, a very subjective subject.

Steves said:

If I was riding on the track I might be interested, along with suspension upgrade and improved ground clearance. But I reckon if someone can ride the TT at an average of 100mph on Dunlop old stylie rubber compounds then I am happy enough on the roads with the same tyre with modern material. I like the 3.60 and 4.10 mix, I know the rear flattens in the centre with mileage, which then makes it a bit twitchy, but it's not something that bothers me too much. For the avoidance of doubt I am referring to TT100's. Plus they just look right on a 70's bike. Just my view of course, a very subjective subject.

Click to expand...

I'm sure TT100s were great tyres. In 1973. The Roadriders are a far superior tyre for modern roads and handle beautifully with ultra light steering. I don't understand people who think that looks are more important than handling. I'm not having a go at you but when I see TT100s on a Commando, I think, "Ah, doesn't get ridden". Do yourself a favour and try some Avons.

About the only thing "classic" about these tires is the sizing, not their appearance. Although newer release, are they really any better than Avons or Bridgestones?

Avon are a UK manufacturing company owned by a US company, over the years they have supported the 'odd' sizes used on Brit bikes with excellent tyres and compounds when others didn't, so I will be sticking with them for a few more years yet. And as these 2 bits of rubber are your only contact with the road except when you are stopped at the lights then looks is not a consideration, you want good grip in dry and wet conditions with good handling and no white lining.

The continentals look like they would handle extremely well in the twisties. I'm pretty happy with the Avons though. I'm no tire expert but that tread pattern on the continentals "looks" to my unprofessional eye like they might not be that good in wet conditions. Then again the first time I rode the Avons in the wet they seemed a little scary to me too. Has anybody used the Continental in the wet much?

i just did 100 miles with the conti classic attack. this is not enough to give a good judge. I fitted 100/90-19 rear and front on the stock wm2 rim. these are differnet tires. they seem to stick very well on the road, "it seems like to ride on rails", just perfect.
the front rim looks wider than the rear, there is plenty of space beside the tires. next time i will try to fit a wider rear tire of these brand.

elefantrider said:

... are they really any better than Avons or Bridgestones?

Click to expand...

I've had nothing but good experiences with both Avons and Bridgestones, but I'm hoping that I'll like the Conti's radial construction even more.
Bill

Fullauto said:

Steves said:

If I was riding on the track I might be interested, along with suspension upgrade and improved ground clearance. But I reckon if someone can ride the TT at an average of 100mph on Dunlop old stylie rubber compounds then I am happy enough on the roads with the same tyre with modern material. I like the 3.60 and 4.10 mix, I know the rear flattens in the centre with mileage, which then makes it a bit twitchy, but it's not something that bothers me too much. For the avoidance of doubt I am referring to TT100's. Plus they just look right on a 70's bike. Just my view of course, a very subjective subject.

Click to expand...

I'm sure TT100s were great tyres. In 1973. The Roadriders are a far superior tyre for modern roads and handle beautifully with ultra light steering. I don't understand people who think that looks are more important than handling. I'm not having a go at you but when I see TT100s on a Commando, I think, "Ah, doesn't get ridden". Do yourself a favour and try some Avons.

Click to expand...

Well Mr. Fullauto I did try Avons on my Commando with original WM2 rims (90/90 front and 100/90 rear) I doubt modern Avon tyres (Roadrider) are designed for our original narrow WM2 Commando rims. Although the Roadrider 90/90 fits great on a WM2 rim a 90/90 is quite narrow on the rear. Roadrider 100/90 does squeeze on a WM2 rim so it really needs a WM3 rim. Also Roadriders don't look right in combination with original front fender due to the huge gap between the tyre and fender. Anyway now my Commando is back on TT100 tyres again. Todays compound of Dunlop TT100 tyres doesn't date from 1973 so for performance and looks I still prefer Dunlop TT100 4.10 x 19 on original WM2 rims and yes it does get ridden :!:

no750 said:

i just did 100 miles with the conti classic attack. this is not enough to give a good judge. I fitted 100/90-19 rear and front on the stock wm2 rim. these are differnet tires. they seem to stick very well on the road, "it seems like to ride on rails", just perfect.
the front rim looks wider than the rear, there is plenty of space beside the tires. next time i will try to fit a wider rear tire of these brand.

Click to expand...

Did you have any problems mounting the 100/90-19 Conti Classic Attacks on the stock WM2 rims?

Yellow_Cad said:

no750 said:

i just did 100 miles with the conti classic attack. this is not enough to give a good judge. I fitted 100/90-19 rear and front on the stock wm2 rim. these are differnet tires. they seem to stick very well on the road, "it seems like to ride on rails", just perfect.
the front rim looks wider than the rear, there is plenty of space beside the tires. next time i will try to fit a wider rear tire of these brand.

Click to expand...

Did you have any problems mounting the 100/90-19 Conti Classic Attacks on the stock WM2 rims?

Click to expand...

I did it not mount them myself. A tireshop in my neigbourhood mounted the tires. But not good. They were not centered correctly. i could fix it in some minutes. So i GUESS it should be no problem.

Hi Y_Cad - sorry for late reply as I have been away for the weekend - my conti attacks are both 19" 100/90 front WM2/rear WM3 - they seem to fit perfectly - as I said they are dimensionally smaller than the TT100 (both 4.10 x 19)

When I asked Continental about 110/85x19 ClassicAttack rear radial, they emailed back from the tech dept. and said "Thank you for your inquiry. Unfortunately, due to low demand, that tire has been postponed in R&D, and is now planned to be reviewed again in 2017. We thank you for your interest in Continental motorcycle tires."