I took find it amazing that you can buy stuff like thisLooked up AN to see what a new shell goes for:
![]()
Andover Norton - GEARBOX SHELL (NOT MK3) (06.0808) - 06.4126
GEARBOX SHELL (NOT MK3) (06.0808)andover-norton.co.uk
In truth that isnt a bad price all things considered. Have to wonder if they crack between the two bearing recesses as per factory.
I guess Im amazed you can actually buy one and it looks nicely made too.
I bet someone at Andover Norton knows. Call/emailI am toying with the idea of milling off the damaged end of such a housing, replacing it with a high-strength aluminum or steel cover. Yes, it will entail some welding and machining work.
This would be an opportunity to specify other bearings and increase wall thickness between bearing outer rings to get rid of the web cracking.
Does anyone know which alloy the main shell is made of?
- Knut
I have been using one of these for about 5 years now. It is stronger than the original.I took find it amazing that you can buy stuff like this
It's also absolutely brilliant IMO
Save time, go buy a new, better one from AN. Use the saved time to get your Nortons on the roadI am toying with the idea of milling off the damaged end of such a housing, replacing it with a high-strength aluminum or steel cover. Yes, it will entail some welding and machining work.
This would be an opportunity to specify other bearings and increase wall thickness between bearing outer rings to get rid of the web cracking.
Does anyone know which alloy the main shell is made of?
- Knut
You are right. A new shell is on the bench. The idea proposed here is a project for the future.Save time, go buy a new, better one from AN. Use the saved time to get your Nortons on the road
Andover is reluctant to share such details. If nobody knows, reverse engineering by having a specimen analyzed is the only solution.I bet someone at Andover Norton knows. Call/email
Andover won't tell you what they are using now, but will probably cheerfully explain what was used in the past, with a thorough explanation of why that alloy was much inferior to present technologyYou are right. A new shell is on the bench. The idea proposed here is a project for the future.
Andover is reluctant to share such details. If nobody knows, reverse engineering by having a specimen analyzed is the only solution.
- Knut
Well, that peanut/genius/maroon.. would be me then :I remember a post where someone asked about holding the sprocket to tighten the nut (70 ft/lbs) One peanut who seems to fancy himself posted a photo with a socket against one tooth and up against the frame (a short arm fulcrum) which is probably the worst thing you could do.
The irony or perhaps idiocy of it was the genius had drilled lightning holes in the sprocket which a simple homemade two pin bar could have engaged to avoid any stress to the gearbox and casing.
What a maroon.
WTF ?It is most likely from being bashed in.
A good deal of the drama with these bikes is previous owners or thoughtless procedures.
I remember a post where someone asked about holding the sprocket to tighten the nut (70 ft/lbs) One peanut who seems to fancy himself posted a photo with a socket against one tooth and up against the frame (a short arm fulcrum) which is probably the worst thing you could do.
The irony or perhaps idiocy of it was the genius had drilled lightning holes in the sprocket which a simple homemade two pin bar could have engaged to avoid any stress to the gearbox and casing.
What a maroon.