Dreer VR880

Status
Not open for further replies.
Rohan said:
internetannoyance said:
Show me one factory original crank for a Norton twin that doesnt have horrendous rocking couple, just one, find me one, i challenge you. .

How far out are we talking about ? Nortons had a central flywheel, where all the balance drilling was done. Doesn't leave too much room for a "tremendous rocking couple", does it ?

Unless you are talking about the 360 degree engine design, in which case your argument turns to sheet, thats not exactly a manufacturing defect in the slightest.

As far as I know, Royal Enfields were one of the few brands that dynamically balanced their big twin cylinder cranks (ie eliminated balance problems side-to-side.). Maybe because they had reportedly horrendous vibrations problems without this ?!

Your arguments turn to water when analysed in detail ??

Not that we'd deny that Nortons did a perfect machining job on everything, when clearly they didn't. But modern CNC can replicate parts with an accuracy that all the old-time manufacturers would have revelled in...

It doesnt sound like you have a lot of first hand experience rebuilding Norton bottom ends. at least from what you just posted. In my experience, most British twins will benefit from a dynamic balance, I say that because I dont make it mandatory for a Triumph crank, but after my experiences with Norton twins, and the experience of some local experts who have machined and balanced hundreds over several decades, I wont consider rebuilding any Norton twin without a mandatory dynamic balance. Kenny got to the point he was rejecting large amounts of parts that were unsuitable for even sending to the machine shop for refurbishing. Dan Hall, who did over 5 decades of machine work on British Iron here locally grumbled greatly about the difficulty of Balancing Norton twins, and their used to be a lot of shops here in the area who built Nortons.


Rocking couple is usually pretty bad on Norton twins and difficult to address, true the flywheel is centrally located, but unlike Triumphs and BSA its not a full width flywheel, thus its hard to work out weight imbalances, while often times you can grind away on a outboard cheek, or drill to remove mass, there is only so much metal to work with. In about half the Norton twins Ive done we had to add mallory metal in other areas just to get them into spec. In a few cases the cranks were so out of whack I rejected them and started over with another crank. Over the years i worked with 3 dynamic balancing guys. My current guy for the last 15 years Does Airplane propeelors, and Industrial equipment mostly, motorcycles are just a side line but he enjoys it when the Bike cranks come in. When Dan hall did them for me he complained about the Norton cranks because what normally is an hour job can stretch into 2 days, Bearing services just stopped accepting Norton twins, it wasnt cost effective to do them, It was suggested we find another vendor, After Dan Hall died R.I.P the guy who took over 3 years ago sold off the machinery and wont accept any British Bike cranks period. I used to average 15 to 20 engine rebuilds a year for British twins. How many have you done? Im not asking how many cranks you personally turned or balanced, but engines built? Ill admit I personally havent turned any cranks personally for the last 20 years But I did do about 14 of them one year in a machine shop for airplanes, mostly lycoming, some continentals, but always under close supervision of the lead, Aircraft cransk start at $5,000 dollars and go up from there. Crank grinding is an art form, so I wouldnt expect the average person to have any experience, but it IS relevant here how much you really know before you claim some elses points arent valid.
Are you certified in any areas? SAE? NDT? A&P?
By the way, CNC is usually associated with Billet or forgings, I suppose there might be applications where a casting such as a Norton crank might be put ina CNC mill or Lathe. Id be interested if you have any experience in mastercam or programing.
 
Empty words - no details.

Knowing what this is about, and doing them for a living is 2 quite different things.
Norton cranks may not always be perfectly machined squarely, but rocking couples (from unequal weight distro within the crank) is not even recognised as a big Norton problem. ?

Give us some detail of how this can be.?
Do the castings vary that much that this is a problem ??
Aside from the engineering aspect of having a large flywheel weight AND 2 crank journals slung between only 2 bearings, on either end.
 
Rohan said:
Empty words - no details.

Knowing what this is about, and doing them for a living is 2 quite different things.
Norton cranks may not always be perfectly machined squarely, but rocking couples (from unequal weight distro within the crank) is not even recognised as a big Norton problem. ?

Give us some detail of how this can be.?
Do the castings vary that much that this is a problem ??
Aside from the engineering aspect of having a large flywheel weight AND 2 crank journals slung between only 2 bearings, on either end.

looks like a flame troll to me,
How would you suggest I prove a negative?, Doing it for a living IS what knowing what its about, what can i tell you? ive only been wrenching on British Iron and Airplanes for 30 years, I may not be the smartest tool in the shed but im smart enough to go learn from guys who have been doing it for over 5 decades.

I was able to BS my way into a Mechanical Science degree, I got a federal license from the FAA for a Airframe and Powerplant license (A&P) Im certified and have taught Powerplant theory, and other mechanical topics, Im certified in Non Destructive Testing for Aerospace applications in Radiology, Borescopes, Eddy current, Mag particle, Liquid penetrants 1 & 2, Visual & Dimensional inspection, and CMM, I worked in castings for aerospace apps for customers and Cost plus engineering for Rolls Royce, Snecma, Fiat, Pratt & Whitney, GE and other clients.

Ive ran my own shop, Ive worked in others, and worked in other fields in mechanical fabrication and manufacturing, Im really not that talented in the machining industry, But my wife is, she is currently a production scheduler and manufacturing specialist, also doing 2 jobs as well filling in for material purchasing, she worked her way up there,.She also used to set up the tooling and presetting the tooling for CMM, machines like Tornos, Wickmans, Mori's, and Some German machines I cant pronounce. She works daily with engineers and programmers who set up the jobs, very high volume machinng and manufacturing. Multi million per year in sales,, thats why I asked if you had any experience or knowledge in CMM, or mastercam.
After all, doing the job for a living IS whats its all about.

what do you need to know? All I can offer is my experience and training, I offered my opinions based on all that, Are you asking for a lesson in mechanical science, or theory? I cant MAKE you learn, I cant FORCE you to agree with me and Im frankly not interested, I dont have time for that, if you dont agree, feel free to ignore me and ill do the same.

What I can do very soon is post some really cool pictures of some interesting British iron, and a very talented master tool and die makers Norton project,
I did lead a ride yesterday for our local Norton club, we had a great time, maybe you should get out and ride too. Lifes too short for pissing contests


Arguing on the internet (in forums like this) is like competing in the special olympics, even if you win, youre still handicapped.
 
You appear to be the flame troll here.
Wild statements, with nothing to back it up.
We've seen em come, and go....

What is wrong with these cranks, that so many are 'rejected.' ?
Spell it out, in even minor detail - why are some so different to others. ??

And as someone pointed out, how can all these perfectly working Commandos come out of the showroom, and many are stiill working well 30 and 40 years later....

Humour us, spell it out.
Or show a pic of where they are 'faulty'....
 
"I did lead a ride yesterday for our local Norton club, we had a great time, maybe you should get out and ride too. "

So you informed them that they were all riding pieces of shite then they followed you around?
Is there a special Norton Masochist club out there that we havent heard of? :mrgreen:

Glen
 
internetannoyance said:
looks like a flame troll to me,
How would you suggest I prove a negative?, Doing it for a living IS what knowing what its about, what can i tell you? ive only been wrenching on British Iron and Airplanes for 30 years, I may not be the smartest tool in the shed but im smart enough to go learn from guys who have been doing it for over 5 decades.

I was able to BS my way into a Mechanical Science degree, I got a federal license from the FAA for a Airframe and Powerplant license (A&P) Im certified and have taught Powerplant theory, and other mechanical topics, Im certified in Non Destructive Testing for Aerospace applications in Radiology, Borescopes, Eddy current, Mag particle, Liquid penetrants 1 & 2, Visual & Dimensional inspection, and CMM, I worked in castings for aerospace apps for customers and Cost plus engineering for Rolls Royce, Snecma, Fiat, Pratt & Whitney, GE and other clients.

Ive ran my own shop, Ive worked in others, and worked in other fields in mechanical fabrication and manufacturing, Im really not that talented in the machining industry, But my wife is, she is currently a production scheduler and manufacturing specialist, also doing 2 jobs as well filling in for material purchasing, she worked her way up there,.She also used to set up the tooling and presetting the tooling for CMM, machines like Tornos, Wickmans, Mori's, and Some German machines I cant pronounce. She works daily with engineers and programmers who set up the jobs, very high volume machinng and manufacturing. Multi million per year in sales,, thats why I asked if you had any experience or knowledge in CMM, or mastercam.
After all, doing the job for a living IS whats its all about.

what do you need to know? All I can offer is my experience and training, I offered my opinions based on all that, Are you asking for a lesson in mechanical science, or theory? I cant MAKE you learn, I cant FORCE you to agree with me and Im frankly not interested, I dont have time for that, if you dont agree, feel free to ignore me and ill do the same.

What I can do very soon is post some really cool pictures of some interesting British iron, and a very talented master tool and die makers Norton project,
I did lead a ride yesterday for our local Norton club, we had a great time, maybe you should get out and ride too. Lifes too short for pissing contests


Arguing on the internet (in forums like this) is like competing in the special olympics, even if you win, youre still handicapped.

Oh, Doug... you have done an excellent job at making yourself welcome here. Next time show some manners and take your shoes off before making yourself at home. :roll:
 
swooshdave said:
Oh, Doug... you have done an excellent job at making yourself welcome here. Next time show some manners and take your shoes off before making yourself at home.

It appears to me that he gave a reasonable synopsis of his credentials, then explained his first-hand findings regarding Norton internals, and significant first-hand experiences with KD. I could be wrong, but I can't find where anyone would have a valid argument without providing equivalent credentials and findings, and significant first-hand acquaintance with KD, none of which were in evidence in the rebuttals...
 
[quote"]"I did lead a ride yesterday for our local Norton club, we had a great time, maybe you should get out and ride too. "

[/quote]

what! ride your bike rather than posting multiple photo's/threads of your latest t-shirt, nonsensical rambling, or going on and on about the newest shiney chrome/alloy piece!! you sir are a heretic, and obviously are not familiar with this (AKA most) internet forums- you'll never get 5000+ post if you keep such behavior up! :mrgreen: :shock:

worntorn said:
"
Is there a special Norton Masochist club out there that we havent heard of? :mrgreen:

Glen

Glen, one might argue that just being a norton/vintage brit bike owner (and riding the damn things) requires a certain degree of masochism :mrgreen:
 
grandpaul said:
It appears to me that he gave a reasonable synopsis of his credentials, then explained his first-hand findings regarding Norton internals, and significant first-hand experiences with KD. I could be wrong, but I can't find where anyone would have a valid argument without providing equivalent credentials and findings, and significant first-hand acquaintance with KD, none of which were in evidence in the rebuttals...

You are showing a lack of technical critical review here, GP ?
All he did was make some wild statements, with nothing in the way of anything concrete (cast iron ?) to back this up technically. Sounded more like a used car salesman having a bad hair day., not a valid engineering summary of an identifiable problem. ?

All parallel twins come with a rocking couple (running), its part of the design.
We had a discussion here recently about Commando cranks, and that cast iron centre section and its being a bit fragile, and almost all the flywheel weight being between the journals with little outboard of the, But as to this suddenly being a MAJOR problem, after 60 years of dominator twin engines, throw-a-way crankshaft time = nothing, nada, etc in the way of explanation of WHY or HOW. this is a now serious problem

Be surprised if this this ever appears, but we may all have something to learn ?
Maybe Commandos are a seriously flawed design, and no-one has ever noticed...
 
P.S. Some of us are wondering if the Dreer VR880 engine had heavier pistons and/or rods.

Its just possible that there wouldn't be enough metal in Commando flywheels to counterbalance heavier items ?? hence the comments.

We wait with interest. Or is that a puppet dangling on a string, after an encore performance...
 
It's certainly easy enough to replicate the VR880 performance, start with a modern Thruxton, spend $1200 on Ohlins shocks, and an equal amount on AK20 fork internals from Traxxion Dynamics in Georgia. A careful 5 angle valve job and a gutted airbox, along with a free flowing exhaust will get you 70. rwhp on pump gas. Bin the airbox, upsize the carbs, deck the head and 75-80 is easy. It will weigh 425 lbs wet. Bin the rev limiter, rev the snot out of it and do it every weekend there's an AHRMA race for a couple of seasons before the clutch needs freshening. You'll need to shift it on the left you know....

My VR880 weighs 398 WET, and has 69.6 rwhp and 58.4 lb/ft of torque. redline is 7000. That's with 34mm Mk II's, a MG CYC 5-6000 cam profile .

Options....easy options... too bad that used thruxtons have become so stinking expensive....But, FAR cheaper than a VR880.

the Dreer is sold btw...

Eric
 
Glen, one might argue that just being a norton/vintage brit bike owner (and riding the damn things) requires a certain degree of masochism :mrgreen:[/quote]

Mike, you're right about that. When working on the Vincent Special last year I remember thinking how easy and relatively cheap it would be to go out and plunk down the cash for a 2 or three year old sportbike instead of building the Glenli. (it's not quite an Egli, so it's a Glenli)
But then I rode it today and have to say it was worth the effort, as are the Nortons. It is a hard way to get/own a motorcycle tho.

Glen
 
Yes , better than the massed produced consumer items for commoners and peasants without the wherewithall to appreciate or opperate or maintain complex machineary .

Just to Rub it in . :D
Dreer VR880


Perfectly good for transport , but hardly creme de la creme of motoring masterpieces . Why , there stamped out by the zillion by machines . And the speedos a bit out . :P

One cant help but admire the tailight assembly and handlebar / headlamp area . :lol: :shock: :roll:
 
Still dreaming of RDs, eh, Matt? cant afford a Dreer VR 880?
To afford an RD, even one as nice as that, you`d likely have to hold down a paying job...
My annoyance with those RDs was due to the [looping under exhaust pipe] footpeg support position. Like non-folding pegs on other bikes, they limit lean angles somewhat.
 
a"LEAKER" said:
It's certainly easy enough to replicate the VR880 performance, start with a modern Thruxton, spend $1200 on Ohlins shocks, and an equal amount on AK20 fork internals from Traxxion Dynamics in Georgia. A careful 5 angle valve job and a gutted airbox, along with a free flowing exhaust will get you 70. rwhp on pump gas. Bin the airbox, upsize the carbs, deck the head and 75-80 is easy. It will weigh 425 lbs wet. Bin the rev limiter, rev the snot out of it and do it every weekend there's an AHRMA race for a couple of seasons before the clutch needs freshening. You'll need to shift it on the left you know....

My VR880 weighs 398 WET, and has 69.6 rwhp and 58.4 lb/ft of torque. redline is 7000. That's with 34mm Mk II's, a MG CYC 5-6000 cam profile .

Options....easy options... too bad that used thruxtons have become so stinking expensive....But, FAR cheaper than a VR880.

the Dreer is sold btw...

Eric

Easier yet, get a good used 05 or 06 Bonneville then add the Hyde Harrier kit. End result, 400 pounds dry, 83 rwhp @ 7200 and 66 foot pounds @ 5400.
Glen
 
Like wot this fing is . ?

Dreer VR880


Seeing it fell there , http://hydeharrier.wordpress.com/

Still looks whizzbangish though .
A Honda Chap saying ' They went to Japan to learn how to make better motorbikes ' Was Corrected " They went there to learn how to mak em Cheap "
Nasty little details like stamped clutch actuators , frame brackets , PLASTIC :shock: , and engineering detail . :?

The sort of thing certain individuals harped on about , in comparison . Jap / British .

Would come down to how it stayed on the road , at speed . When its all lumpy & has sweeping bends etc .
Big fang last W end . A bird on a New Bonne stropiest , learnt on whizz bangs , inc. flying lessons on some 1100 .

Not sure theyre the same thing as the ancient compact versatile originals . But suited now for touring & dealer serviceing . They DONT carry tools . :mrgreen:
Though nothing broke down , and a Panther 100 & 37 Velo 500 wernt left standing .

SOOO , the Dreer's hand built . in all respects . Thats not cheap .

moren common with THIS . :)

Dreer VR880
 
Have to agree on that particular one Matt. Those Thailand built Bonneviles are not appealing to me, they failed to capture the lean, cool, measured style of the originals, & are way too porky, being about as light stripped down as the heaviest stock original.
Have you found any pix of that John Minnono/Big D `70s Superbike Bonneville?
 
J.A.W. said:
Have to agree on that particular one Matt. Those Thailand built Bonneviles are not appealing to me, they failed to capture the lean, cool, measured style of the originals, & are way too porky, being about as light stripped down as the heaviest stock original.

Except that with thier HP, they more than make up for it. PLUS, there is a HUGE aftermarket industry that has sprung up around the NB variants and you can make them "leaner and meaner" for a very reasonable sum.

If you take what Norton is asking for a new Commando, and spend it on buying and tricking out a Thruxton, not only will you ACTUALLY HAVE a bike, you'll have one that will smoke the new Norton in any venue you can choose.
 
If the weight Hyde lists is correct, you just cant call it porky. 400 pounds dry is lighter than a lot of new sportbikes and lighter than the lightest stock Commando as well as the 961 (414). According to my Suzuki dealing friend, actual dry weight of a gsxr 1000 is 406, not 385 as listed.
The plastic bodywork on the Hyde Harrier doesnt look great and the quality of it is poor. I have a magazine review of the bike, there are large visible carbunkles in the glasswork. My thought would be to chuck the body kit and make up something sleek in alloy.

Glen
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top