worntorn said:I once went out with a girl who was just like the Norton, great looking and curvaceous but much heftier than the waif like number she claimed for her weight. Not that I was complaining! :mrgreen:
worntorn said:The thing that caught my eye in the Cycle World article was the weight -490 without fuel. The manufacturer's claim is 415 dry, so that's quite a fib! I can't imagine Cycle World having an misguided scale but I do know manufacturers fib about weight.
I once went out with a girl who was just like the Norton, great looking and curvaceous but much heftier than the waif like number she claimed for her weight. Not that I was complaining! :mrgreen:
BPHORSEGUY said:pkeithkelly said:I read the Cycle World review a couple of days ago when the magazine showed up in my mailbox.
Just saying.... ALthough I love my Mark 3, i have to say, if i was going to drop $20K, i would opt for the XDiavel long before the 961
I think its pretty safe to say you're not going to drop 20k on any bike soon!!!