comnoz said:I think that was mentioned a few posts back. Jim
Yep, that's why I was surprised to see he'll restrict himself to 96%.... :wink:
Tim
comnoz said:I think that was mentioned a few posts back. Jim
Tintin said:comnoz said:I think that was mentioned a few posts back. Jim
Yep, that's why I was surprised to see he'll restrict himself to 96%.... :wink:
Tim
hobot said:Commoz I don't know why I'd want mid 90's BF either, yet i've some hints and reasons to believe it may help traction. hi hobot,if traction is your aim have you considered a 90 degree crank or even a 76 degree crank{ ive no experience with either but from what ive read on the subject both aid traction} if memory serves me well the japs did something similar with their 500 two smoke gp bikes in the early 90s,instead of equal firing they changed the cranks to bring the power strokes much closer together{big bang} it improved traction and made the bikes easier to ride
chris plant said:hobot said:Commoz I don't know why I'd want mid 90's BF either, yet i've some hints and reasons to believe it may help traction. hi hobot,if traction is your aim have you considered a 90 degree crank or even a 76 degree crank{ ive no experience with either but from what ive read on the subject both aid traction} if memory serves me well the japs did something similar with their 500 two smoke gp bikes in the early 90s,instead of equal firing they changed the cranks to bring the power strokes much closer together{big bang} it improved traction and made the bikes easier to ride
I'm looking forward to the first ride on my 924cc twingle. Jim
hobot said:I'm looking forward to the first ride on my 924cc twingle. Jim
mkane77g said:45 laps last night at an indoor electric cart place, and I am a bit sore, mostly lat's. a few red spots here and there. And all this bf has been interesting reading. Mabey i'll go with stock bf this time. Or do 2 cranks, 1 stock & 1 @ ?