Classic tinware tanks

Status
Not open for further replies.
The only reason to cut a tank up is to check material thickness due to stretching (pressed or hammer formed)
At a long shot maybe if it had overlapped seams,otherwise you would use a borescope :roll:

The questions that should be asked are.
Is it a pressing or hammer formed ?
What is the material and thickness ?
How many sections and if pressed in what manner and where are the seams ?
What welding method ?
 
Time Warp said:
The only reason to cut a tank up is to check material thickness due to stretching (pressed or hammer formed)

You could drill a little hole or 6 to measure thickness - and at least weld them back up with a mig.
Why not ask the supplier ?

You could look through the filler cap with a torch to see internal welds ?
How many handmade Commando tanks anywhere in the world are likely to be pressed ?
Beaten on a former is the best the alloy tank suppliers can do...
 
Time Warp said:
The only reason to cut a tank up is to check material thickness due to stretching (pressed or hammer formed)
At a long shot maybe if it had overlapped seams,otherwise you would use a borescope :roll:

Edit add on.
If it is done by the same manufacturer as those Interstate tanks that 'Partsparadise51 sell I will buy one.
I will send a PM to Tinman. :lol:

yes, Time Warp those questions should be investigated. But the main reason for opening up is to get an unrestricted view of the metal condition of the complete inside of the tank. there has been talk by Mr Tinman himself of rust already on the sheets before processing. I want to see the complete condition of what state the internal metal is in, and how well and with what it has been treated. Not all of us have access to a Borescope, and it may even then not show the whole story of the inside. Un restricted visual inspection to me is the best bet.

Mr Time warp, by all means please keep us informed about the correspondence you recieve from Tinman.
I hope I am wrong in my suspicions and that these tanks are very good. but I am cautious and will remain so due to past experiences.

Caveat Emptor. again. Bradley
 
B.Rad said:
Mr Time warp, by all means please keep us informed about the correspondence you recieve from Tinman.
I hope I am wrong in my suspicions and that these tanks are very good. but I am cautious and will remain so due to past experiences.

Caveat Emptor. again. Bradley

I changed my mind and edited it,I read all the hand wringing posts on tanks in general out of India and simply brought one off Partsparadise,nothing wrong with it and it was some $217 + $72 post.
Compare that to people wanting $600 in the US for a $hitty 40 year old OEM tank and over $1000 here. :roll: :lol:
Admittedly I picked up a mint long range Fastback tank though for $200 something locally.
Like you say at the end of the day you take your chances,I have had worse luck with some of the bikes purchased out of the US,bodgy work and mechanical s is an understatement. :?

What does seem to happen in general is no action ?
If this seller wants to make more sales he will provide the evidence.
Most likely the thread will disappear or it will turn into the usual debate over something off topic like 'What month did the chrome thickness on the fuel cap get decreased by 0.0002 " :lol:
 
Unless someone sends him a FB tank and gets the results, we will never know. It's interesting that I've heard of several people that have been pleased with his Roadster tanks though, but time will tell. I've been tempted to get a Roadster tank from him. given the reports, but I have an early bike and the later Roadster tanks are thicker at the front and the early stanchions hit the tank because of the early fork stops.

If I had a FB tank I didn't want, I'd take up his offer.

As said, this thread may go nowhere, unfortunately.\\

I've tried to get US GRP manufacturers to make Roadster tanks to no avail too.

Dave
 
by gory:
You can't say fairer than that, sounds like a man who will not only stand behind his product, but also trust a recipient (who he does not apparently know) to evaluate at no cost to the recipient.
I have had some very poor 'parts' from some good sources, this source is unknown to me but the attitude he is showing is quite uncommon these days. Good luck to him if he is as decent as he sounds.

REPLY- CUSTOMER SERVICE IS THE KEY TO WIN. IF WE DO NOT PROVIDE GOOD SERVICE, WE WILL NEVER GET ANY BUSINESS. SO, I WILL ALWAYS STAND BACK AND MAKE SURE ALL THE PRODUCTS ARE PERFECT FOR THE CUSTOMER.



by B.Rad:
OK Mr Tinman, . if you have not sent any yet I will have a Fastback tank.
If you take this offer up I will report on an unbiased view on what I actually find backed up by photographs.

The tank will be cut in half to actually observe the entire inside finish. So this will cost you a tank. Cutting in 2 is the best test . cant hide anything this way. Or send the tank to Charles or Tim, or to someone else but to me the TANK MUST BE CUT OPEN. never having had fuel in the tank is a big safety factor.

If you are still keen to test your tank this way PM me for postage details. CAVEAT EMPTOR: The Golden Rule
Bradley

REPLY- BRADLEY, I THINK THIS IS NOT A GOOD IDEA FOR SOMETHING WHICH IS BEAUTIFULLY HAND FORMED. THIS IS NOT ABOUT MONEY BUT THIS IS ABOUT THE AMOUNT OF TIME AND SKILLS FABRICATOR WILL PUT IN THE FABRICATION WHICH WILL BE WASTED IN JUST A MATTER OF SECONDS. THERE ARE MANY OTHER WAYS YOU CAN TEST THE TANKS (PRESSURE TEST, DRILL A HOLE TO CHECK THE THICKNESS AS ADVISED BY ROHAN, USING A TORCH OR A SCOPE) BUT SPOILING THE TANK ISN'T A GOOD IDEA. YOU CAN TEST FIT THE TANK ON THE BIKE, PUT PETROL AND CHECK IF IT LEAKS. I THINK THAT IS ALL WHAT MATTERS.



by DogT:
Bradley, you'll probably have to contact Mr. Tinman at his business, I doubt if he reads this forum much, but yes it would be interesting to see a new FB metal tank. It would almost tempt me to get a set to have my bike look like 2 bikes.

REPLY- I DO CHECK ALL POSTS BUT I HAVE BEEN HAVING HARD TIME TO LOGIN INTO THIS SITE. EVERYTIME I LOGIN, IT SHOWS AN ERROR (FORBIDDEN 503 OR SOMETHING). I CHECK ALL POSTS AND MAILS EVERYDAY SO IF I DO NOT REPLY HERE, THERE'S PROBABLY SOME PROBLEM LOGGING IN. YOU CAN REACH ME DIRECTLY AT classictinware@yahoo.com



by Rohan:
Thats a pretty raw deal - for him ?
He sends you a tank on credit, big postage, and then you are going to destroy it ???

We'd rather hear how they perform - thats the usual test for a tank ?!

REPLY- RIGHT, THERE ARE MANY OTHER WAYS WE CAN TEST THE TANK BUT DESTROYING THE TANK ISN'T A GOOD IDEA. HOW MANY OF THE FORUM MEMBERS ARE IN FAVOR OF CUTTING THE TANK WHICH WILL END UP GOING IN THE BIN? I HAVE ANOTHER IDEA, I CAN SEND AN UN-WELDED TANK SO THAT BRADLEY CAN CHECK THE TOP WELDS, AND GET THE BOTTOM TIG-WELDED THERE. THIS WAY, HE CAN CHECK THE QUALITY AS WELL AS USE IT ON THE BIKE.



by Time Warp:
The only reason to cut a tank up is to check material thickness due to stretching (pressed or hammer formed)
At a long shot maybe if it had overlapped seams,otherwise you would use a borescope :roll:

The questions that should be asked are.
Is it a pressing or hammer formed ?
What is the material and thickness ?
How many sections and if pressed in what manner and where are the seams ?
What welding method ?

REPLY- IF WE PRESS THEM, MOLD COSTS WOULD BE AROUND 25000 DOLLARS, MINIMUM PRODUCTION HAS TO BE 1000 TANK WHICH WILL ALL BE STUCK AS THEY ARE NOT MANY MOTORCYCLES LEFT SO HAND FORMING IS THE BEST METHOD. WE USE 18 GAUGE CRCA SHEETS. ALL PRESSED TANKS USE 20-22 GAUGE SHEETS. WE USE CONVENTIONAL GAS AS WELL AS TIG WELDING.



by DogT:
Unless someone sends him a FB tank and gets the results, we will never know. It's interesting that I've heard of several people that have been pleased with his Roadster tanks though, but time will tell. I've been tempted to get a Roadster tank from him. given the reports, but I have an early bike and the later Roadster tanks are thicker at the front and the early stanchions hit the tank because of the early fork stops.
If I had a FB tank I didn't want, I'd take up his offer.
As said, this thread may go nowhere, unfortunately.\\
I've tried to get US GRP manufacturers to make Roadster tanks to no avail too.
Dave


REPLY- WHAT I CAN DO IS SEND A ROADSTER TANK TO DAVE AND HE CAN TEST IT ON THE BIKE AS WELL AS GIVE REVIEWS TO THE MEMBERS? THERE ARE 2 SHAPES IN ROADSTER TANKS, ONE IS FIBERGLASS TANK WHICH IS SMALLER AND HAS SMOOTH CURVES. THE OTHER ONE IS THE STEEL TANK WHICH IS A LITTLE BIGGER AND EDGY THAN THE FIBERGLASS TANK. WE MAKE BOTH SHAPES IN STEEL & ALUMINUM.


PLEASE ADVISE.
 
hey Tinman, good on ya.

Dont twist the subject. I do not want, for lots of reasons your unwelded tank. Myself , I think you are trying on a red herring. I really have heard it all before.

You cannot say "our tanks are perfect, but". there are no buts. They are, or they are not.

My requirements are very simple. I wish to determine if the inside is treated as said and this treatment is good and covers 100%. also if the complete insides have been or are showing pitting & signs of surface rust as implied by you in previous post. ... To me, cut the damn thing open. tell no lies then. You dont want this, thats fine. Dont send one. after all you are in business not to make money you said.

Also fella, about the only thing voted for here is the annual bike comp. Of course you will have your supporters, but be very careful of trying to wedge, or polarise, this forum. Things are not done here on popular vote.

So my request stands. Why is it so important not to look inside the tank. R&D costs for proper engineering can cost many thousands of dollars. Reputations are not gained easily. If u dont trust me, get someone else. or keep up the yap instead.

Mate, I got better things to do than debate an unknown quality. for thats what it is. if you still want to send one to cut up thats fine.

until someone parts with the cash & buys one, anyway.But it wont be me. Hope U sell thousands Bradley
 
It sounds like the tinman has made a couple of fair offers. There's no reason to be so hard on him. Let's take the free tank he offered or the unwelded one and evaluate it.
I don't think it is wise to alienate this possible source until we have proof he is unworthy.
Jaydee
 
Well said jaydee. One tecnique I use is to review a seller's EBAY feedback. Not definitive but fairly reliable. I have also contacted the people that posted feedback and got some good candid insights that don't make it in the restricted EBAY feedback :)
 
B.Rad said:
Also fella, about the only thing voted for here is the annual bike comp. Of course you will have your supporters, but be very careful of trying to wedge, or polarise, this forum. Things are not done here on popular vote.

Yeah, well looks like you're the one doing the wedging. It pretty bloody clear, a free tank has been offered. Take it to a NDT shop and have a Boroscope inserted and all the evidence inside will be revealed. That had already been recommended. I don't know of any other vendor who would donate and ship a tank to someone who is as narrow minded and rude as you.
 
Looks to me like he threw the gauntlet down so I've contacted him to see what kind of a deal we can strike.

Dave
 
DogT said:
Looks to me like he threw the gauntlet down so I've contacted him to see what kind of a deal we can strike.

Dave
Hey Dave,
good to see someone has stepped up to the plate, i applaud you. Anil has offered to send tanks free of charge in this thread to show the quality a couple of times. Glad he is getting the opportunity for this forum to critique. Me, i am more interested in the fastback tanks so maybe have to take a leaf out of your book and be the test pilot for them.
Plenty on Nortoneers here in the West and well known parts supplier and engineering shop all keen to look.
Tim
 
Tough crowd. The guy comes on here and offers to let you try the tank risk free, and some of you make up cute names for him (Tinman?) and offer to destroy the tank. It's actually pretty rude in my opinion. Maybe try the tank? That's about the most genuine offer I've ever seen from a vendor online. Best of luck to Classic Tinware, I'll buy from you in the future.
 
I've been in touch with Anil and apparently he has agreed to send someone a tank. I'd like to see the report on that before I commit, I realize he can't be sending free tanks to everyone.

I have to say, he knows the difference between the early fiberglass tanks and the later (71 and up) tanks. He does list the fastback tanks on his site. http://classictinware.com/index.php?rou ... _68&page=2 I only see fastback and a few others for the Norton, but he seems willing to make Roadster tanks too in nearly any configuration you may like. He said he can make me a tank in the early Roadster size and also without the external seams and even the hinge on the front of the filler.

Earlier I was confusing him (Classic Tinware) with Partsparadise51. Partsparadise is the only tank I've seen good reports on on this forum, but it may be modeled after the 71 tank, I just don't know and am not going to buy a tank if my stanchions hit the tank.

He has mentioned to me that he has trouble logging on the forum and I accept that, others in various countries have had that problem. I think we need to see at least one of his products reviewed.
 
DogT said:
I've been in touch with Anil and apparently he has agreed to send someone a tank. I'd like to see the report on that before I commit, I realize he can't be sending free tanks to everyone.

I have to say, he knows the difference between the early fiberglass tanks and the later (71 and up) tanks. He does list the fastback tanks on his site. http://classictinware.com/index.php?rou ... _68&page=2 I only see fastback and a few others for the Norton, but he seems willing to make Roadster tanks too in nearly any configuration you may like. He said he can make me a tank in the early Roadster size and also without the external seams and even the hinge on the front of the filler.

Earlier I was confusing him (Classic Tinware) with Partsparadise51. Partsparadise is the only tank I've seen good reports on on this forum, but it may be modeled after the 71 tank, I just don't know and am not going to buy a tank if my stanchions hit the tank.

He has mentioned to me that he has trouble logging on the forum and I accept that, others in various countries have had that problem. I think we need to see at least one of his products reviewed.


WOW, I wish I had known that before I modified my seat to make room for a later model steel tank, which has the ugly exposed seems!
 
+1
not to say that the prospective seller has the best product or the worst ( he may or he may not) - but there are some really douche comments from people when the guy is openly offering to send a tank for someone to look at - its funny as at the same time we have FACTUAL comment about shoddy work from so called "expurts" on this forum but they can't be mentioned because there "members" - get F'n real people


russhud said:
Tough crowd. The guy comes on here and offers to let you try the tank risk free, and some of you make up cute names for him (Tinman?) and offer to destroy the tank. It's actually pretty rude in my opinion. Maybe try the tank? That's about the most genuine offer I've ever seen from a vendor online. Best of luck to Classic Tinware, I'll buy from you in the future.
 
Meanwhile 40 year old tanks that might be full of rust and bondo are fetching in the neighborhood of 700 dollars on Ebay.
 
Hello forum. Hope u r all well.
it may be "bloody rude to some, even the majority, but it wont change my mind on how I would like to test these tanks. I again have my sound reasons.

To those vehemently opposed to my suggestion, calm down, it aint going to happen. I do respectfully remind members that R&D for proper engineering may cost thousands of $, and may or may not involve testing to destruction. I have obviously sent some people apopolectic at my suggestion. I have no desire to fight with members here, but merely urge caution and healthy dose of scepticism.

ML said:
I don't know of any other vendor who would donate and ship a tank to someone who is as narrow minded and rude as you.

AND I REMAIN SCEPTICAL, until proved otherwise.
Time will tell the real story here, and it may go longer than a couple of test tanks sent to selected customers.

To Tinman, if you have the best tanks in the world, and I am wrong, you will have an unreserved apology made publicly. Now you cant get any fairer than that
Caveat Emptor again, Bradley
 
I've just picked up on this thread and have only read the last page and I would like to say that we use industrial ultra sonic testers at work. They're made by Olympus and when we're blending out a corrosion damaged area on a Boeing or component and the damaged area Isn't on the edge or an area that you can't get a set of dial calipers or micrometer on, we will check the thickness of the remaining sheet metal with the ultra sonic tester. So cutting up the tank just to see if it was stretched too thin during forming is not necessary in this day and age. Cj
 
cjandme said:
I've just picked up on this thread and have only read the last page and I would like to say that we use industrial ultra sonic testers at work. They're made by Olympus and when we're blending out a corrosion damaged area on a Boeing or component and the damaged area Isn't on the edge or an area that you can't get a set of dial calipers or micrometer on, we will check the thickness of the remaining sheet metal with the ultra sonic tester. So cutting up the tank just to see if it was stretched too thin during forming is not necessary in this day and age. Cj


I doubt many Norton owners have access to an industrial ultra sonic tester. Cutting up a free tank would be a lot cheaper than paying for NDT. If it were me, I'd cut up the tank and if it checked out I'd weld it back up and use it. If it didn't check out I'd post pictures and results here. Actually, either good or bad, I'd let my fellow forum members know.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top