Chain Conversion 520

Status
Not open for further replies.
.. I ran my bike for many years that way after wearing out too many cast rear sprockets with the 520 conversion. Jim
How many miles did you get out of these 520 rear sprockets ?
No sign of accelerated wear on mine, even on the gearbox sprocket which was only surface hardened after machining. Not a huge mileage but 13,400 miles to date. Chain used to require regular adjustment, every month during riding season. Now twice a year or every 1500-1800 miles.
 
ludwig said:
comnoz said:
.. I ran my bike for many years that way after wearing out too many cast rear sprockets with the 520 conversion. Jim

How many miles did you get out of these 520 rear sprockets ?

I don't think I ever reached 10,000 miles on a narrowed cast sprocket. Usually that meant one a year. I probably could have done better if I lubed it enough. Jim
 
ludwig said:
comnoz said:
..I don't think I ever reached 10,000 miles on a narrowed cast sprocket. Usually that meant one a year. I probably could have done better if I lubed it enough..

Shedding a 100 lbs of your bike would probably help too ..
10000 mls is really not very much , especially considering the work and money involved .
I get more out of aluminium sprockets , probably because I never run one chain to the end , but switch between diff. chains . But like I said in another thread II stopped doing that now .
I posted this picture before :


Chain Conversion 520


The sprocket on top has 25000 km ( 15000+ mls) and shows little visible wear , although I consider it worn ..
It is 6mm wide , 40 T . I use a 20-40 ratio ( and yes , I know about prime nrs ..)
I get these sprockets blank ( blind ?) for 20-30$ and cut the holes myself , so cost is hardly an issue .

Mayby off topic , but if you consider changing to 520 , why not go all the way :
ditch that ultra heavy , overcomplicated Norton wheel and buy a complete wheel from some Jap offroader .
You can get these wheels real cheap .
Mine is from a Honda CR500 .

Benefits are legio :
Cheap , easy to change sprockets in any ratio you want .
Disk brake .
Exel rim WM 3 or 4 ( better)
One piece spindle ,evt hollow .
Better choice of tyres .
Some come with real cush drives .
Loose something like 20 lbs of unsprung weight .
etc ...
Just make shure it fits in the swingarm .
Ok , you may have to fabricate some spacers and a speedo drive ( or go electronic ) but you'll have a better bike , and save A LOT on maintenance .

Probably sacrilege for purists ,but I believe they look pretty good on a Commando :

Chain Conversion 520


Chain Conversion 520
that wheel looks exellent i have a similar setup on my commando i used an apprillia pegaso back wheel i had to modify the cush drive moving the sprocket inwards to get the chain alignment ,i ran this for a while with the 17" rim but i didnt like the handling so i had it re laced to 19" the wheel is very light and benefits from having straight spokes easy to change if you ever had to ,,,,,,,,,,,,,baz
 
Shedding a 100 lbs of your bike would probably help too ..
10000 mls is really not very much , especially considering the work and money involved .
I get more out of aluminium sprockets , probably because I never run one chain to the end , but switch between diff. chains . But like I said in another thread II stopped doing that now .
[/quote]

Well I cured the problem and lost a few more lbs.

Chain Conversion 520


Actually my bike weighs less than stock even with the fairing, luggage rack and added stuff because the front end is quite a bit lighter even with the dual disks. Plus the starter has been removed and the primary and secondary belt drives have been installed.

Not to say it is a lightweight like yours but it sure is comfy in the twisties.

And now with around 10,000 miles on the rear belt drive I have not even needed to adjust it. Jim
 
Man!!! those are both nice, ludwigs chain and jims belt, I'm jealous of both :)))))))
 
Onder said:
....but they are not stock :-O

My bike is completely stock. It is registered as a 1982 HMD [homemade] and it's just like I built it. It is likely the most stock bike here. Jim
 
Jim, you should qualify for vintage plates in a few years I hope. After all, fair is fair.
 
RennieK said:
Jim, you should qualify for vintage plates in a few years I hope. After all, fair is fair.

I wish. As of now in Co. I built it 8 years too late. :(
 
Horrors. A lot of unseemly handwaving and pencil whipping going on here! :)
I find it amusing how belts are the thing now and it the ancient days belts were used too.
Good idea really.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top