Are swingarm stiffening collars total BS?

Joined
May 2026
Messages
2
So this might be considered heresy but I am curious what others think who have real world experience (that is, not theoretical). I am new to Norton Commando improvements and fetteling and I do not profess to know all about the specifics of this bike BUT, I have many years of working on bikes(mostly Hondas and Ducatis).
I had a Commando given to me and am in the middle of a ground up restoration and want to make all the reccomended improvements but this swingarm mod seems to me to be total bullshit. I will explain my harsh conclusion.
My bike has perfectly tight bushings and a swingarm pivot in very good condition, no play or sloppiness whatsoever. The spindle retaining bolt threads tightly into the spindle and cinches down tightly.
My understanding of the need for these clamps is that lateral loads cause some kind of swingarm movement that unsettles handeling in bends. Can someone explain where this movement occurs and how these janky collars solve the problem. The reason I am skeptical is that the tiny tapered tip 3/16” grub screws tighten against a polished and hardened steel shaft less than 2”away to “stabilize” things. How much clamping power can this tiny bit of purchase provide? The factory clamping bolt threads into the shaft securely and seems to do the job.
The grub screw is only long enough to just touch the shaft if you want to tighten the locking nut so I am assuming it is not intended to go into a drilled and threaded hole. I tried to drill a dimple in the shaft with a new cobalt bit and got nowhere. To make a threaded hole I would need to grind a flat to get a good punched starting point. I only want to do that if there is a good reason to do this mod.
My experience with other retro-mod projects is that there are lots of “modifications” aftermarket suppliers are willing to sell you and plenty of people who have done the mod and think you should do it too (because they have). I have learned through experience some are total BS and I am thinking this is one of them. I am especially interested in a cogent explanation of how this mod is supposed to work. Thanks all for bearing with my rant, I just hate wasting money on junk because I got all excited about a new project.
 
I'm guessing you're referring to Kegler clamps?
My imperfect understanding is they're primarily used when the spindle has spun in the gearbox cradle due to the bearings being seized and the retaining screw sheared, and they eliminate the slack caused.
I've never had the problem and never felt the need to use them. The Mk3 cradle uses cotter pins to secure the spindle, so it was clearly a weakness of the original design that a single 1/4" screw could be easily sheared. Fortunately it's not happened on any of the bikes I've worked on.
So, maybe not so much of an upgrade, but definitely a solution to a problem some have encountered.
 
One can have the perfect swingarm bushing to spindle fit, and still have the problem, because the spindle passes through the engine cradle, and the bore in this cradle wears over time due to flex from the isolastic setup that is transfered by the rear wheel, which is mounted to the swingarm, which is mounted to the cradle, which is mounted to rubber - a recipe for wear. The Heinz Kegler mod (which we, and others sell) was to drill two holes in the cradle tube and use split clamps with set screws to press the spindle up against the forward wall of the engine cradle bore, thereby removing the slop. No need to drill or dimple the spindle - the set-screws press it against the inner wall of the worn bore, removing the slop. Norton realized this was a problem and rectified it in their own way in 1975 with the cotter pin setup on the MK3 swingarms - pressing these wedged pins against the spindle, thereby pushing the spindle against the bore of the cradle. It is a real problem on many bikes, and the split clamps are an easy fix.
 
Last edited:
So this might be considered heresy but I am curious what others think who have real world experience (that is, not theoretical). I am new to Norton Commando improvements and fetteling and I do not profess to know all about the specifics of this bike BUT, I have many years of working on bikes(mostly Hondas and Ducatis).
I had a Commando given to me and am in the middle of a ground up restoration and want to make all the reccomended improvements but this swingarm mod seems to me to be total bullshit. I will explain my harsh conclusion.
My bike has perfectly tight bushings and a swingarm pivot in very good condition, no play or sloppiness whatsoever. The spindle retaining bolt threads tightly into the spindle and cinches down tightly.
My understanding of the need for these clamps is that lateral loads cause some kind of swingarm movement that unsettles handeling in bends. Can someone explain where this movement occurs and how these janky collars solve the problem. The reason I am skeptical is that the tiny tapered tip 3/16” grub screws tighten against a polished and hardened steel shaft less than 2”away to “stabilize” things. How much clamping power can this tiny bit of purchase provide? The factory clamping bolt threads into the shaft securely and seems to do the job.
The grub screw is only long enough to just touch the shaft if you want to tighten the locking nut so I am assuming it is not intended to go into a drilled and threaded hole. I tried to drill a dimple in the shaft with a new cobalt bit and got nowhere. To make a threaded hole I would need to grind a flat to get a good punched starting point. I only want to do that if there is a good reason to do this mod.
My experience with other retro-mod projects is that there are lots of “modifications” aftermarket suppliers are willing to sell you and plenty of people who have done the mod and think you should do it too (because they have). I have learned through experience some are total BS and I am thinking this is one of them. I am especially interested in a cogent explanation of how this mod is supposed to work. Thanks all for bearing with my rant, I just hate wasting money on junk because I got all excited about a new project.

So this might be considered heresy but I am curious what others think who have real world experience (that is, not theoretical). I am new to Norton Commando improvements and fetteling and I do not profess to know all about the specifics of this bike BUT, I have many years of working on bikes(mostly Hondas and Ducatis).
I had a Commando given to me and am in the middle of a ground up restoration and want to make all the reccomended improvements but this swingarm mod seems to me to be total bullshit. I will explain my harsh conclusion.
My bike has perfectly tight bushings and a swingarm pivot in very good condition, no play or sloppiness whatsoever. The spindle retaining bolt threads tightly into the spindle and cinches down tightly.
My understanding of the need for these clamps is that lateral loads cause some kind of swingarm movement that unsettles handeling in bends. Can someone explain where this movement occurs and how these janky collars solve the problem. The reason I am skeptical is that the tiny tapered tip 3/16” grub screws tighten against a polished and hardened steel shaft less than 2”away to “stabilize” things. How much clamping power can this tiny bit of purchase provide? The factory clamping bolt threads into the shaft securely and seems to do the job.
The grub screw is only long enough to just touch the shaft if you want to tighten the locking nut so I am assuming it is not intended to go into a drilled and threaded hole. I tried to drill a dimple in the shaft with a new cobalt bit and got nowhere. To make a threaded hole I would need to grind a flat to get a good punched starting point. I only want to do that if there is a good reason to do this mod.
My experience with other retro-mod projects is that there are lots of “modifications” aftermarket suppliers are willing to sell you and plenty of people who have done the mod and think you should do it too (because they have). I have learned through experience some are total BS and I am thinking this is one of them. I am especially interested in a cogent explanation of how this mod is supposed to work. Thanks all for bearing with my rant, I just hate wasting money on junk because I got all excited about a new project.
Funny, botboi🤖
 
One can have the perfect swingarm bushing to spindle fit, and still have the problem, because the spindle passes through the engine cradle, and the bore in this cradle wears over time due to flex from the isolastic setup that is transfered by the rear wheel, which is mounted to the swingarm, which is mounted to the cradle, which is mounted to rubber - a recipe for wear. The Heinz Kegler mod (which we, and others sell) was to drill two holes in the cradle tube and use split clamps with set screws to press the spindle up against the forward wall of the engine cradle bore, thereby removing the slop. No need to drill or dimple the spindle - the set-screws press it against the inner wall of the worn bore, removing the slop. Norton realized this was a problem and rectified it in their own way (in 1975 with the cotter pin setup on the MK3 swingarms - pressing these wedged pins against the spindle,punt thereby pushing the spindle against the bore of the cradle. It is a real problem on many bikes, and the split clamps are an easy fix.
Home slice: Thanks so much, now I understand how this is supposed to work. That is just the well reasoned answer I was looking for. It turns out my bike has such low miles (12,00) that the bore of the cradle is not worn. Since I have the clamps ready to install I will put them on to avoid future wear problems.
I am so impressed with this site, appears to have have a staggering amount of information and expertice, glad to be a part of the Norton community.
 
Back
Top