The Norton engine is constrained by having a single camshaft so when you advance the inlet you also advance the exhaust. So this masked the result a little.
But in theory, and many times in practice, advancing the inlet cam will improve mid range power without hurting the top end (say between 3500 and 5500 rpm) . The trade off is that below around 2000 to 3000 you may get a significant power loss.
For racing this can be extremely helpful.
AG Bell suggests if you advance the inlet you can sometimes restore any loss of top end by retarding the exhaust cam. Obviously with a Norton you cant do this without remachining the cam but on a Triumph twin it is possible. ( Having checked you are not going to cause the valves to collide during overlap

)
I did this experiment on my 500 Dominator race bike more than ten years ago and got a good HP gain on the dyno between 4300 and 6200 (up to 4 bhp at some points). In my case the power remained unchanged above 6200 rpm) But the bike had no power whatsoever below 4000 so only good for racing.
(I experimented up to 13 deg advance using a vernier. )
If you look at this plot the blue line is labeled original exhaust. Then compare with the pink line which is the same set up but with the cam advanced 13 deg. No other changes made. You can see the gains and losses. This is useful on a 500 race bike because power in this part of the curve gets you out of corners. This was very early in my tests and eventually I got the rear wheel dyno power over 51 bhp on petrol. These two runs were done with street style exhausts. The higher runs are with different megaphone and header pipe experiments so ignore them.
[/URL]
This is the final result with optimized cam timing, exhausts, inlet tuning , carbs, ignition timing etc
[/URL]