didn't notice this until I had the engine out and began to clean the frame
Another question,,, when you were taking out the power unit,,,, did it seem like there was undue strain at the Isolastic mounts?
didn't notice this until I had the engine out and began to clean the frame
Wasco in the states is the only place I know, Richard is super knowledgeable with Commando framesHave you seen the size of the top tube 'spine' on a commando frame?
No, not really.Another question,,, when you were taking out the power unit,,,, did it seem like there was undue strain at the Isolastic mounts?
A lot of this material has been covered. A quick search here on the forum. Will let you read and look at pictures for half the day.Another question,,, when you were taking out the power unit,,,, did it seem like there was undue strain at the Isolastic mounts?
A lot of this material has been covered. A quick search here on the forum. Will let you read and look at pictures for half the day.
Sorry, I read that one quickly and I thought it was the OP saying he had binding. My mistake.Will a search on the forum tell me if there is a lot of strain at the isolastic mount on the OPs Commando??
If there was a lot of strain there it may indicate a significantly bent frame.
A "significantly bent frame" would be visible to the naked eye, and may call for a frame replacement.Will a search on the forum tell me if there is a lot of strain at the isolastic mount on the OPs Commando??
If there was a lot of strain there it may indicate a significantly bent frame.
A "significantly bent frame" would be visible to the naked eye, and may call for a frame replacement.
I think some deformation could be absorbed by the rubber mounts - compression of rubbers is not a good measure of state of the frame.
The workshop manual has pictures with frame checking dimensions. I would go by them.
- Knut
Just bash the fu cker in, she be right lolI will try to explain what I was thinking.
In the manual the dimensions given for the distance between the front and rear isolastic mounting holes is 18.28".
Lets say as you are removing one of those isolastic mounting bolts that sucker is just stuck in there. As you finally force it out there is a bit of a clunk. You can see that there is no way you are getting that bolt back in that hole as it just doesn't line up. To me that would indicate perhaps that 18.28" specification is no longer met in this frame, perhaps due to the bends above the front isolastic mounting point.
I have a 73 850 frame with light crushing to both front tubes from a P.O. crash bar fitting . No bendings . I'm thinking filler will do it and repainting . History was "The Jumper " from Movie Production days . I worked in Movie Production for 6 years . Canada .Just bash the fu cker in, she be right lol
I have a 73 850 frame with light crushing to both front tubes from a P.O. crash bar fitting
So you are admitting to being a future Dreaded Previous Owner? Brave man!I cannot blame a previous owner for my little dents. I did that myself 50 years ago!! I have no intention of covering up these little scars. It's part of our shared history.
So you are admitting to being a future Dreaded Previous Owner? Brave man!