155 HP 920cc Norton on Nitros - crash at Bonneville

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Nov 26, 2009
Messages
3,385
Country flag
Just got word from Fred Eiker. He had his 920cc Nort on two differet dynos. On Nitros its putting out 155+ engine HP and 107+HP at the rear wheel (is this a HP record for Norton?). Better than its 1st dyno run which showed 140 crank HP and 104 rear wheel HP. Its got lightweight pistons, JS stage 2 cam & other goodies in it to help it run smooth at high RPM and he'll be taking a shot at the 1000cc fuel/unstreamlined Bonneville speed record next week (he is presently exactly tied for that record).

Everyone cross your fingers.

155 HP 920cc Norton on Nitros - crash at Bonneville
 
Re: 140 HP 920cc Norton on Nitros

OMGoodness! Very good news the innards can take that torque. btw to calc. hp they need real torque x rpm, do you have that more interesting twist figure?
Best wishes on boring a hole in the salt lake air.
 
Re: 140 HP 920cc Norton on Nitros

btw TC's dual engine Dragon Slayer was rated 300 hp total on nitrometythane around 8000 rpm.
 
Re: 140 HP 920cc Norton on Nitros

WOW ... that thing must sound great at speed - wailing out of those megaphones
 
Re: 140 HP 920cc Norton on Nitros

Hobot, because TC Christiansen both lived by the Harley factory in Wisconsin, and because his main competition was the Harley factory drag bikes, he named his the "Hogslayer", and not the Dragaon Slayer. Just FYI
 
Re: 140 HP 920cc Norton on Nitros

Does nitrous effectively cancel the effects of the altitude at Bonneville? In other words, can they expect to see 140hp by balancing the nitrous to fuel to recreate what the motor sees at sea level?
 
Re: 140 HP 920cc Norton on Nitros

rpatton said:
Does nitrous effectively cancel the effects of the altitude at Bonneville? In other words, can they expect to see 140hp by balancing the nitrous to fuel to recreate what the motor sees at sea level?

As nitrous is an oxidizer I would expect to have a positive attitude on the situation.
 
Re: 140 HP 920cc Norton on Nitros

rpatton said:
Does nitrous effectively cancel the effects of the altitude at Bonneville? In other words, can they expect to see 140hp by balancing the nitrous to fuel to recreate what the motor sees at sea level?


As this bike is running in the "fuel" class I would imagine its using nitromethane rather than nitrous oxide.
 
Re: 140 HP 920cc Norton on Nitros

Fred’s land speed racer is using Nitrous oxide as well as gas. Also known as laughing gas as used by your local dentist. It basically doubles the HP. The Germans started using it in world war 2 to catch fast high altitude mosquito reconnaissance planes. Its probably the easiest and best way to gain HP without knocking out your rods as Nitro methane can do. Anything other than straight gas has to run in the fuel class.

What I heard is that TCs Hogslayer put out 130 HP per motor on 90% Nitro methane and Alky.
He beat everyone for a few years because he got better launches and was quicker rather than faster.
 
Re: 140 HP 920cc Norton on Nitros

Has he been running on Nos for long? And is he running billet crank and gear box casings?
 
Re: 140 HP 920cc Norton on Nitros

OH so this land speeder wonder if on NOS not Nitromethane. I got to interview the 200+ mph cycler's at Texas Mile and they must wait till hi rpm and hi speed before cutting in NOS or bad juju happens with smoking tire or smoked up mechanical remains. NOS is oxidizer that will burn Al pistons as fuel if no Extra fuel dump with it. I will call TC to get his report and how I know what rpm he pressed but all the web info says 150 per engine. Wife watches too much Vampire stuff so I got brain tied on the wrong name.

We all would love to see and learn more details on this instant go getter.

Engine calculators imply Ms Peel in daily commute state should make 140 hp/120 lb, on 87 octane unleaded and creek water by 7000. For extra credit expensive windshield washer fluid instead. I do not believe what calculators says with 112 octane and methanol spray @ 8000 so not plugged in any NOS or Nitromethane. I got some advice on H2O fueling from RBRacing big twins. W/o alternator, air station and big water tank, IS gas tank and over stuffed seat, crash cage and full faring and luggage, might have power/torque to mass ratio to confuse us all in hill climbs to landing strips. My base line assumption is drag race set up 920 engine w/o boost makes 80 hp. If that is un-realistic then so are rest of my posts.
Takes other calculators to ball park port velocity to plug in.
interweb-engine-calculator-game-t8398.html
 
Re: 140 HP 920cc Norton on Nitros

He has a heavy duty 5 speed 1980s English box with thicker shafts - a special quaife. Heavy duty tranny case. Remember that TC used to get away with stock cases - for a short time. I'm involved in supplying the longer bushless JS/Carrillo rods and lightweight 920cc pistons. The pistons are ceramic coated for this application. He told me that it runs "so much smoother" than his previous 880cc pistons which created so much vibration that it was "scary". His CR is 11.5:1 and he's using a JS 2 cam with the lightweight lifters so over-revving into valve float shouldn't be a problem.

He has it geared for 7200RPM at top speed and he has to hold it there for a minute or two so stress is a big concern and with all that power you just want it to stay together.

He uses gapless rings and a copper head gasket plus copper rings that dig into the head gasket to prevent leakage under the high combustion pressure. The head is a trick original Norton factory (R7 I think) racing head that comes with different valve locations & angles. The Huge valves required re-cutting the valve pockets in the pistons even though the pistons were already set up for stage 3 big valve heads.

The two into one exhaust was designed and developed on the dyno by Jim Mosher who also built the motor and set it up for Nitrous.

Jim M uses a computer to dial in the Nitros mix. The motor has spent a hour on the dyno so far and that's a whole lot of stress in itself to subject it to. But if its going to blow you'd rather do it before you travel and tuck in for a 160mph blast.
 
Re: 140 HP 920cc Norton on Nitros

Gosh Jim, that's better than un-dressing a movie star for us old farts : )
I've interviewed Commando drag racers, some now dead, others just got out engineered by moderns before they got theirs race worthy, to a man they said AMC boxes spill guts about 100 hp level, so I'm amazed TC got away with them at all.
Steve Maney says he limits his 920 race engines to 7200 for race endurance with 'over mass pistons' compared to yours.

Head sealing is an mystery issue on Peel, even with it cabled down extra on head steady plate. Ken hinted he thinks Maney sleeves stand a bit proud of surface to crush into copper but so far no definite answer if its so on Peels deal. I have no expectations to go WOT but on too small a tire or loose stuff to protect the gear box until a few years more saving up for a 4 spd TTI tranny. Peel is fit limited to 130 rear size in road profile or flat slick. If that's not up to dusting the moderns or vintage in road work then so be it. But my testing shows its only a straight line sprint limiter and the moderns road racer are wheelie G's limited. I think heat flow will limit Peel to fairly short bursts so impressed no end by those pressing a Norton style engine to full elastic range w/o becoming plasticity deformed=disassembled.
 
Re: 140 HP 920cc Norton on Nitros

jseng1 said:
He has a heavy duty 5 speed 1980s English box with thicker shafts than quaife or TT Ind - it may no longer be available. Not sure about the cases. Remember that TC used to get away with stock cases - for a short time. I'm involved in supplying the longer bushless JS/Carrillo rods and lightweight 920cc pistons. The pistons are ceramic coated for this application. He told me that it runs "so much smoother" than his previous 880cc pistons which created so much vibration that it was "scary". His CR is 11.5:1 and he's using a JS 2 cam with the lightweight lifters so over-revving into valve float shouldn't be a problem.

He has it geared for 7200RPM at top speed and he has to hold it there for a minute or two so stress is a big concern and with all that power you just want it to stay together.

He uses gapless rings and a copper head gasket plus copper rings that dig into the head gasket to prevent leakage under the high combustion pressure. The head is a trick original Norton factory (R7 I think) racing head that comes with different valve locations & angles. The Huge valves required re-cutting the valve pockets in the pistons even though the pistons were already set up for stage 3 big valve heads.

The two into one exhaust was designed and developed on the dyno by Jim Mosher who also built the motor and set it up for Nitrous.

Jim M uses a computer to dial in the Nitros mix. The motor has spent a hour on the dyno so far and that's a whole lot of stress in itself to subject it to. But if its going to blow you'd rather do it before you travel and tuck in for a 160mph blast.

I can add a bit to that, Jim. Unless Fred has changed the gearbox since I sold him the bike, it is a Quaife. It is a complete heavy duty Quaife 5-speed, not the earlier gearset kit that fits in the stock AMC shell, but the later unit with all Quaife parts. It is a bit beefier than the earlier gearsets, with needle bearings in place of some of the bronze bushes, and a different clutch release and shifter pawl mechanisms. The output shaft accepts the Commando clutch, but the drive sprocket is a finer spline (21 splines) than the stock Commando.

The cylinder head is a factory short stroke 750 head (RH7) that had the combustion chamber welded up by Jim Messler, ex factory tuner, to a bathtub shape to allow high compression with flat top pistons. Jim also fitted even larger intake and exhaust valves, in titanium. Jim Mosher, Fred's tuner, has probably modified the head somewhat, but I don't have those details.

The cases are stock 850 Commando. I replaced them with a new set in 1987, when I rebuilt the engine for the original owner, Martin Adams, after a blowup at Laguna Seca. The crankshaft is a Dave Nourish one-piece with stock 89 mm stroke. The engine originally had Crower titanium rods and Omega pistons, but those have been replaced with your lightweight kit. It originally had an Axtell cam, which has been replaced with your cam and kit. The cylinders were originally stock 850 items bored out to 79 mm, but have been replaced with another set of stock 850 cylinders sleeved out to 81 mm and grooved for the copper o-rings.

Primary drive is a Norman White belt drive.

Original carbs were Amals on long manifolds welded to the head. Jim Mosher removed the long manifolds and fitted new flat slide carbs.

Ignition was a custom Lucas unit with a Hall effect crankshaft trigger, and I think they are still using it.

That's most of what I can recall at the moment.

Ken
 
Re: 140 HP 920cc Norton on Nitros

It looks unlikely that we will see a new record from the bike this year. Fred ran the bike Saturday, the first day of Speed Week, at Bonneville, and came off as he was shifting into 5th gear at 135 mph. The course was really rough, and Fred said it just went out of control and he couldn't do anything about it. He said it felt like the worst highside he could imagine. Fred has had some road racing crashes before, but he said this was way worse. He's back home with two broken ribs and severe soft tissue damage to his shoulder. The bike endoed a few times, and has some broken tubes near the headstock, but Fred thinks it can be repaired. Too bad. He said the engine was running really great, and he was sure they had enough power in hand to easily break the existing 155 mph record. The last event at Bonneville is World Finals in October, and I'd be surprised if they could make it there. Next year looks lots more likely.

Ken
 
Re: 140 HP 920cc Norton on Nitros

Sad to here that guys. Was waiting for some good news.
Lets hope the track condition improves for next time out.
All the best
AC.
 
Re: 140 HP 920cc Norton on Nitros

Hope he mends quickly, the bike can always be fixed.
lcrken said:
...as he was shifting into 5th gear at 135 mph...
that's damn impressive in it's own right!
 
Re: 140 HP 920cc Norton on Nitros

Gosh this racing is a tough man's sport in so many ways. Ken assured me a C'do based chassis is up to about any speed but any bike can meat its match on bad surfaces, especially the kind with a loose layer... Ken has another sad tail about a wining C'do that got into rough salt and died. Did he see blue/white blue/white blue/white or just white on white till stopped?

I can't tell ya how much a thin rubber magnet over cycle broken ribs allowed me to ride and work with more annoyance than spikes of pain to breath, laugh or reach out or pull. Its was having many fractures at once that I tired mega doses of the multi mineral complex for bone and joint to find almost miracle relief even with spinal injury. I just keep taking more until i eased up significantly or got too loose of stools. We want to see Fred back in saddle like a tracer in top gear.
 
Re: 140 HP 920cc Norton on Nitros

lcrken said:
It looks unlikely that we will see a new record from the bike this year. Fred ran the bike Saturday, the first day of Speed Week, at Bonneville, and came off as he was shifting into 5th gear at 135 mph. The course was really rough, and Fred said it just went out of control and he couldn't do anything about it. He said it felt like the worst highside he could imagine. Fred has had some road racing crashes before, but he said this was way worse. He's back home with two broken ribs and severe soft tissue damage to his shoulder. The bike endoed a few times, and has some broken tubes near the headstock, but Fred thinks it can be repaired. Too bad. He said the engine was running really great, and he was sure they had enough power in hand to easily break the existing 155 mph record. The last event at Bonneville is World Finals in October, and I'd be surprised if they could make it there. Next year looks lots more likely.

Ken


Thats a real shame...............wonder what class he was running in?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top