xbacksideslider said:Melania is "cashing in" on what?
Show us how that post is anything but a smear.
You must have skipped ethics classes ?
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-nords ... SKBN15O1V4
xbacksideslider said:Melania is "cashing in" on what?
Show us how that post is anything but a smear.
hobot said:https://geopolitics.co/2017/02/04/u-n-official-reveals-real-reason-behind-the-global-warming-scare/
bill said:aAl gore is not the boogegyman he is an opertunist trying to get rich on a scheme that DOES NOT FIX ANYTHING. the carbon offsets is is like letting me shi## in your well because i bought an offset .As to W -V -gore some of the lefties would have us left with muzzle loaders and cap pistols. this bull $$it about hunting and the second amendment is just that, it has NOTHING to do with hunting and everthing about MY right to own a gun PERIOD.
If you listen to some you would think that we ARE the MAIN cause of climate change. the US , Europe and aust. have done a lot to clean up our act and YES we need to get these third world country's on board BUT IMHO we are less of an effect than some want us to think. like i asked just what put us in an ice age and brought us out of the last ice age ? it sure was not caused by mankind. climate changes with or without us. the one thing I will agree on is we don't need to keep $hitting in our pool.
Danno said:This is how things get distorted, and headed in the wrong direction. Al Gore's the boogeyman, trying to steal all your life savings to run his ill-conceived crusade to pretend to save the planet. Reminds me of W's campaign to convince voters Gore was out to take everyone's guns away.
To my recollection, nobody ever said humanity was the SOLE cause of climate change, only that we are contributors. So if we spend the next several hundred years arguing to what degree we contribute, instead of reducing our contribution....
And if someone gets rich (God forbid!) from actually trying to mitigate our impact on the climate, how many will it take to equal all the loot the polluters have made fighting to keep status quo? Just because China and India do it, and we have to "compete" with them, then we have to pollute also?
bill said:aAl gore is not the boogegyman he is an opertunist trying to get rich on a scheme that DOES NOT FIX ANYTHING. the carbon offsets is is like letting me shi## in your well because i bought an offset .As to W -V -gore some of the lefties would have us left with muzzle loaders and cap pistols. this bull $$it about hunting and the second amendment is just that, it has NOTHING to do with hunting and everthing about MY right to own a gun PERIOD.
If you listen to some you would think that we ARE the MAIN cause of climate change. the US , Europe and aust. have done a lot to clean up our act and YES we need to get these third world country's on board BUT IMHO we are less of an effect than some want us to think. like i asked just what put us in an ice age and brought us out of the last ice age ? it sure was not caused by mankind. climate changes with or without us. the one thing I will agree on is we don't need to keep $hitting in our pool.
Danno said:This is how things get distorted, and headed in the wrong direction. Al Gore's the boogeyman, trying to steal all your life savings to run his ill-conceived crusade to pretend to save the planet. Reminds me of W's campaign to convince voters Gore was out to take everyone's guns away.
To my recollection, nobody ever said humanity was the SOLE cause of climate change, only that we are contributors. So if we spend the next several hundred years arguing to what degree we contribute, instead of reducing our contribution....
And if someone gets rich (God forbid!) from actually trying to mitigate our impact on the climate, how many will it take to equal all the loot the polluters have made fighting to keep status quo? Just because China and India do it, and we have to "compete" with them, then we have to pollute also?
bill said:aAl gore is not the boogegyman he is an opertunist trying to get rich on a scheme that DOES NOT FIX ANYTHING. the carbon offsets is is like letting me shi## in your well because i bought an offset .As to W -V -gore some of the lefties would have us left with muzzle loaders and cap pistols. this bull $$it about hunting and the second amendment is just that, it has NOTHING to do with hunting and everthing about MY right to own a gun PERIOD.
If you listen to some you would think that we ARE the MAIN cause of climate change. the US , Europe and aust. have done a lot to clean up our act and YES we need to get these third world country's on board BUT IMHO we are less of an effect than some want us to think. like i asked just what put us in an ice age and brought us out of the last ice age ? it sure was not caused by mankind. climate changes with or without us. the one thing I will agree on is we don't need to keep $hitting in our pool.
Danno said:This is how things get distorted, and headed in the wrong direction. Al Gore's the boogeyman, trying to steal all your life savings to run his ill-conceived crusade to pretend to save the planet. Reminds me of W's campaign to convince voters Gore was out to take everyone's guns away.
To my recollection, nobody ever said humanity was the SOLE cause of climate change, only that we are contributors. So if we spend the next several hundred years arguing to what degree we contribute, instead of reducing our contribution....
And if someone gets rich (God forbid!) from actually trying to mitigate our impact on the climate, how many will it take to equal all the loot the polluters have made fighting to keep status quo? Just because China and India do it, and we have to "compete" with them, then we have to pollute also?
Danno said:I take what I know or think I know from years of experience, not internet links, political blogs or what any opinionated talking head says. Talk radio is just something to entertain morons who are too stupid to listen to and appreciate good music.
Danno said:In any good debate, you just can't say "do nothing because nothing can be done" or "it's just a natural cycle and out of our hands." That is abdication of responsibility.
bill said:typical left response. attack, belittle and call names. you can be as thick in the head as a bull in in the a$$. remember the ring debate where I even posted a page from federal Mogul but it took a video to prove me right.
Danno said:I take what I know or think I know from years of experience, not internet links, political blogs or what any opinionated talking head says. Talk radio is just something to entertain morons who are too stupid to listen to and appreciate good music.
I have NEVER said we should sit on our a$$ and do nothing because we have cleaned up our act a LOT over the last 40 + years. what i am sick and tired of is the greenies like others where what ever you do it is NEVER ENOUGH. again just like the gun control advocates. look at Chicago, Baltimore and DC where they have the strictest gun laws in the nation and the highest murder rates. the proof is there that the gun control advocate's plan does not work.
Danno said:In any good debate, you just can't say "do nothing because nothing can be done" or "it's just a natural cycle and out of our hands." That is abdication of responsibility.
i
Danno said:So, back to Trump: his cabinet appointments include a closeted racist Attorney General, A Secretary of Energy who campaigned on abolishing DOE, but couldn't remember which department he was talking about (or presumably WHY he favored abolishment other than the fact that the oil industry doesn't like government 'meddling' in their affairs), a press secretary who proposed there are "alternate" facts and an Education Secretary who thinks her job is to bring the "Glory of God" back to our public schools. Oh, yeah I almost forgot a Chief of Staff who was a do-nothing right-wing talking head Rush Limbaugh-wannabe.
Trump recently threatened a Texas State Senator who had proposed a law forbidding property seizures without a convictions. Trump and his ilk are not pleased with innocent until proven guilty. Or individual property rights over eminent domain. Sounds like fascism to me.
Oh, yeah, almost forgot, when his Supreme Court nominee said The President's questioning the integrity of judges was "disheartening and demoralizing", the Donald responded that the comments were "misconstrued" and "taken out of context".
So when someone outside Trump's circle criticized him, they are dismissed, belittled and threatened and when it comes from inside, well, they really didn't say that? The needle on the bullshit meter has pegged and broken off the stem.