Fast Eddie
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 2013
- Messages
- 23,347
Said it before and I’ll say it again… the Atlas range wudda sold like freakin’ hot cakes !Atlas anyone!!
I would have had a Superlight and a scrambler version by now.
Said it before and I’ll say it again… the Atlas range wudda sold like freakin’ hot cakes !Atlas anyone!!
Good discussion points Voodooo, but you’re still not ‘comparing apples’, and your facts may be a bit skewedSure it does. The super cruiser is a brand new model designed by Roland sands and then put into production by Buell.
Since its design, they kept the public at notice.
It’s been a 2 year development, ready for purchase in 2025, and many of them are already shown, ridden across the country, test ridden and used as stunt bikes.
The only shared part is the engine. They already displayed everything made in the USA and where in the USA it’s made at.



Just a discussion Voodooo. This recent review is worth a read ref commonality of parts.Stephen. Wake up.
Have you even followed the super cruiser? Apparently not. Not sure why you’re comparing the hammerhead to the super cruiser. Not even remotely the same bike in any form.
The super cruiser has a brand new frame design, body work, suspension, wheels, brakes, etc.
in fact it’s not using the single disc front brake, not the same suspension or frame. Sands made the prototype, since then, it’s been changed and just went through its 3rd version. 475 pounds.
175+ hp
Ran the 1/4 mile in the 9.90s
So let’s see anything TVS Norton’s done in the last 4 years. All I hear is crickets. Not a single word or picture of anything. TVS Nortons used the same 961 and v4 from garner. What’s your point of the buell using the same engine? It’s 175-185hp. Not good enough? It’s also American produced.
In the meantime buell also said in 2021 it would be offering 10 new models. So yes I agree it’s not apples to apples because Norton hasn’t proven or shown anything.
Do yourself a favor, do some YouTube research
Happy to keep going with a ‘discussion’.Stephen again. You’re embarrassing yourself. Always thinking you know everything. Like I said, buell has been keeping its followers in the loop with up to date information. As I said, they announced they will not be using the single perimeter rotor. They also modified the frame and made other changes since that article you posted from September. Keep going.
With respect Scott, the ‘back and forth’ you mention ‘is’ the discussion - this being a ‘discussion’ forum. That’s not what you are doing here.There isn’t anything else to discuss. It just turns into back and forth nonsense. You see Norton as the all mighty and purposeful plan and that’s the final.
I simply state that two companies whom both have modern day ups and downs as a business, Norton and Buell.
Both with new ownership and nearly identical start up times, and how one shares their products and progress with the media and public and how the other refuses to do so.
All you want to do is argue facts and can’t admit ever being wrong about anything and you’ll defend TVS to your grave.
Even when I shown you facts of the progress of buell and their products, to try to talk like you know what is but can’t accept them.
Sure! The super cruiser has a shared motor from the past. That’s a bad thing?
They actually have bikes available, and the newest model is available soon.
$120 million in pre orders. That says a lot.
Especially for just one model of bike (super cruiser)
By the way, it wasn’t a 3 year building process.
Buell keeps sharing the final details and slight changes of the cruiser as it goes into final production. Are their bikes style for everyone? Absolutely not! Nor are any other brands. Where is TVS?
You alway take my criticism of TVS as negative.
As slimy as Garner was / is, at least he made known what was soon to come or was in the works. He and Donington staff also kept Norton lovers excited for new and promising models.
I’m sorry that my excitement of Norton is not that of yours anymore, perhaps it will someday again when we actually see proof and progress instead of just cheap words and talk.
Donington Norton even made a Norton 961 service manual .As slimy as Garner was / is, at least he made known what was soon to come or was in the works. He and Donington staff also kept Norton lovers excited for new and promising models.
Tony, this is the most subtle reply ever!Donington Norton even made a Norton 961 service manual .
You have some valid points to make. The discussion is worth progressing. You opt instead to escalate to argument (with vitriol). Discussion ends.Not what I’m doing? Explain
Why is it that anytime we try to communicate, it’s like we don’t speak the same language.
Happy to respond via PM.Stephen, a few comments back I clearly made the point of 2 motorcycle brands, both of whom have near identical start up dates.
One is talking about releasing new models, the other has shown new models and is going to production as we write this.
With demo models to actually ride and have been ridden across the country.
You argue the point of them not being apples to apples.
Agreed. Buell is already and has been posting and sharing this information with a real, ready to ride model.
Norton has not done any of this.
You claim that the buell engine is from the past and other current models. Ok and?
Because they use a current engine and swing arm from other models? Nothing else is shared from other models.
What is Norton using?
Instead you take my comments and tell me I’m wrong and say it’s been over 3 years, it hasn’t.
You tell me I’m being argumentative and “vitriol”
I’ve been following the super cruiser from day one.
From prototype to now. You pull up some out dated news that’s already changed as time to production models become final.
You take my “opinions” as arguments.
You don’t think you’re being argumentative? Really?
When I try to show you facts, you come back with insults.
Norton and buell have most definitely had different ways of showing what they have to offer. I’m not wrong about that. That’s a fact.
Even if Norton has new bikes on display at the show next month, they won’t have them ready for purchase or public testing. Watch and tell me I’m being argumentative and vitriol again.
Maybe so, but launched to the public? does that mean the public can then buy them, or buy them 6 -10 months further down the line. My post is about what they say publicly, and timescales. They claim they are looking to expand into Europe and the USA, if that is the case then the Cologne show and EICMA are the places to unveil the bikes. Despite us little englanders being the centre of the motorcycle world, like it or not, the NEC show is not a world renowned show in the motorcycle world.They never intended to attend Cologne or EICMA. The list of exhibitors on the NEC live website include Norton (See link below). Any bikes shown may be preproduction models, but the first new models were also due to be launched to the public in the Spring of 2025.
![]()
don’t think they will be built at Solihull.and we will see which models are actually built at Solihull!
Wages India v Wages UK.The 450 singles will be built by TVS in India, the 'big' high end bikes will be built in Solihull (the current plant has a capacity of 7000 bikes per year). The middle weight bikes could be either.
Nice, I like the look of them. How is it? ( perhaps reply in the Royal Enfield section).That's strange, just bought miself a 450 Royal Enfield Guerrilla last week just got to run it in now. Wonder if there is any collaboration between the two manufacturers on engine design.