- Joined
- Mar 18, 2013
- Messages
- 17

Hello All,
First post here, but hopefully not the last. I want to buy a commando.................it has always been the bike I wanted but never got. I have a bit of trepidation as I have always been told to get a Triumph Bonneville over a Norton Commando. Reasons are as follows Commandos are harder to get parts for, parts are more expensive, engine is not as well designed as a Triumph. Commandos require more maintenance. Are any of these arguments valid? I have been led to believe that the Norton Commando is the Harley iron head of English bikes.
Obviously I do not expect anyone to talk me out of getting one.....but what I would like is an accurate idea of what Commando ownership will entail. I am not scared of turning a wrench...........in fact I really enjoy it. I have built a couple of bikes all from the ground up............but this will be my first British bike.
I know what I see and I love the look of the Commando. It looks just right as it is..no customization needed.In my eyes it looks perfect. For me it's the roadster model.
A 1970 model has come up for sale at a distant vintage shop. I haven't seen it in person but it looks nice. It had the engine "freshened up" and it has over 21000 miles on the clock.The mechanic who has been around Nortons all his life says that it is a quiet running engine, and that he would have no hesitation in riding it as a regular everyday bike. I get a good feeling from him and I believe that hes being honest about the condition of the bike. He is flipping the bike and has documentation for work done to it under different ownership at a different shop in excess of $7000. He is asking $6500.
Look forward to your feedback.
Thanks Dave
First post here, but hopefully not the last. I want to buy a commando.................it has always been the bike I wanted but never got. I have a bit of trepidation as I have always been told to get a Triumph Bonneville over a Norton Commando. Reasons are as follows Commandos are harder to get parts for, parts are more expensive, engine is not as well designed as a Triumph. Commandos require more maintenance. Are any of these arguments valid? I have been led to believe that the Norton Commando is the Harley iron head of English bikes.
Obviously I do not expect anyone to talk me out of getting one.....but what I would like is an accurate idea of what Commando ownership will entail. I am not scared of turning a wrench...........in fact I really enjoy it. I have built a couple of bikes all from the ground up............but this will be my first British bike.
I know what I see and I love the look of the Commando. It looks just right as it is..no customization needed.In my eyes it looks perfect. For me it's the roadster model.
A 1970 model has come up for sale at a distant vintage shop. I haven't seen it in person but it looks nice. It had the engine "freshened up" and it has over 21000 miles on the clock.The mechanic who has been around Nortons all his life says that it is a quiet running engine, and that he would have no hesitation in riding it as a regular everyday bike. I get a good feeling from him and I believe that hes being honest about the condition of the bike. He is flipping the bike and has documentation for work done to it under different ownership at a different shop in excess of $7000. He is asking $6500.
Look forward to your feedback.
Thanks Dave