New posts

Reply to thread

Message

Japanese enthusiasts should go somewhere else to spew lies about the Commando, Norton, or the British motorcycle industry in general.

How is it racist to point out that multinational corporations were found guilty of “dumping”? It is a matter of record. Since they were “dumping” to get rid of 1.4 million bikes that nobody wanted it also proves that customers absolutely did not prefer a HoYaSuKa to everything else.

Well, that means you are old enough to know something.

Well, they missed a few bad posts. I don’t sell bikes but there are still companies today that do sell refurbished Commandos and a post on this site states that vital Commando parts are no longer available. Such FUD can hurt the sales of those bikes. Even the posts that revise history into fiction can harm those companies that are preserving history by still making Commandos available for a reasonable price.

Is there some sort rule that says I can't point out when someone is lying about the Commando? Why should it have to be done by an administrator? Maybe they get tired of dealing with all the poppycock.

Are you damning the Commando with faint praise and then following it up with a hail Norton?

Do you own a Commando?

<blockquote data-quote="Murray B" data-source="post: 142388" data-attributes="member: 3694">Japanese enthusiasts should go somewhere else to spew lies about the Commando, Norton, or the British motorcycle industry in general.How is it racist to point out that multinational corporations were found guilty of “dumping”?&nbsp;&nbsp; It is a matter of record.&nbsp; Since they were “dumping” to get rid of 1.4 million bikes that nobody wanted it also proves that customers absolutely did not prefer a HoYaSuKa to everything else.Well, that means you are old enough to know something.Well, they missed a few bad posts.&nbsp; I don’t sell bikes but there are still companies today that do sell refurbished Commandos and a post on this site states that vital Commando parts are no longer available.&nbsp; Such FUD can hurt the sales of those bikes.&nbsp; Even the posts that revise history into fiction can harm those companies that are preserving history by still making Commandos available for a reasonable price.&nbsp; Is there some sort rule that says I can&#039;t point out when someone is lying about the Commando?&nbsp; Why should it have to be done by an administrator?&nbsp; Maybe they get tired of dealing with all the poppycock. Are you damning the Commando with faint praise and then following it up with a hail Norton?&nbsp;Do you own a Commando?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Murray B, post: 142388, member: 3694"] Japanese enthusiasts should go somewhere else to spew lies about the Commando, Norton, or the British motorcycle industry in general. How is it racist to point out that multinational corporations were found guilty of “dumping”? It is a matter of record. Since they were “dumping” to get rid of 1.4 million bikes that nobody wanted it also proves that customers absolutely did not prefer a HoYaSuKa to everything else. Well, that means you are old enough to know something. Well, they missed a few bad posts. I don’t sell bikes but there are still companies today that do sell refurbished Commandos and a post on this site states that vital Commando parts are no longer available. Such FUD can hurt the sales of those bikes. Even the posts that revise history into fiction can harm those companies that are preserving history by still making Commandos available for a reasonable price. Is there some sort rule that says I can't point out when someone is lying about the Commando? Why should it have to be done by an administrator? Maybe they get tired of dealing with all the poppycock. Are you damning the Commando with faint praise and then following it up with a hail Norton? Do you own a Commando? [/QUOTE]