- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 2,919

I was getting involved with dragging off topic another post on neutral gearbox indicator.
the Mick hemmings gearbox video has a bit about the bushes in the sleeve gear pinion I am looking into ways to improve this area.
So I’m going to throw this out to all you Engineers and see if this is a good idea or not.
Background: Awhile ago (years) I was talking to Rick Harrett from Highway Cycle about the bushes in the sleeve gear pinion and the differences between Triumph gearbox and the AMC gearbox. He knows a lot more about Triumphs and I know squat about them. He stated that the triumphs never had worn out bushes as often as the Norton’s. The triumph gearbox bushes were oil groove spiraled and are longer. http://www.nsamotorcycles.co.uk/57-1370 ... 4647-p.asp The spirals carry the oil through the length of the sleeve gear almost to the other end (stops about ½” from the end, possibly to dam oil from leaving the pinion from the sprocket side). Part #57-1370 Triumph high gear bush compared to Norton 040062, oil impregnated sintered bronze (I have seen 2 or 3 installed in the sleeve gear pinion). The 57-ID fits the main shaft diameter perfectly on the Norton. But the OD of the bush needs to be taken down by machining by .0025” maybe more up to 0.003” to allow for compression when the bush gets pressed into the pinion gear. I am planning on doing just that as an experiment.
Now looking at the spiraled bush from the gearbox internals, the spiral is clockwise in direction and stops ½” from end as mentioned above. Does it make a difference, which way the spiral is cut in relation to the direction of the main shaft rotation to feed oil into the spiral efficiently? In other words will I get more oil in there if the spiral is counter or anticlockwise? The bush will always be slower or stopped as in neutral position and will be equal speed to the main shaft when finally in 4th.
I think hobot would be interested in this too.
I am going to grab a beer and have a think. Waiting for some comments.
Cheers,
Tom
CNN
the Mick hemmings gearbox video has a bit about the bushes in the sleeve gear pinion I am looking into ways to improve this area.
So I’m going to throw this out to all you Engineers and see if this is a good idea or not.
Background: Awhile ago (years) I was talking to Rick Harrett from Highway Cycle about the bushes in the sleeve gear pinion and the differences between Triumph gearbox and the AMC gearbox. He knows a lot more about Triumphs and I know squat about them. He stated that the triumphs never had worn out bushes as often as the Norton’s. The triumph gearbox bushes were oil groove spiraled and are longer. http://www.nsamotorcycles.co.uk/57-1370 ... 4647-p.asp The spirals carry the oil through the length of the sleeve gear almost to the other end (stops about ½” from the end, possibly to dam oil from leaving the pinion from the sprocket side). Part #57-1370 Triumph high gear bush compared to Norton 040062, oil impregnated sintered bronze (I have seen 2 or 3 installed in the sleeve gear pinion). The 57-ID fits the main shaft diameter perfectly on the Norton. But the OD of the bush needs to be taken down by machining by .0025” maybe more up to 0.003” to allow for compression when the bush gets pressed into the pinion gear. I am planning on doing just that as an experiment.
Now looking at the spiraled bush from the gearbox internals, the spiral is clockwise in direction and stops ½” from end as mentioned above. Does it make a difference, which way the spiral is cut in relation to the direction of the main shaft rotation to feed oil into the spiral efficiently? In other words will I get more oil in there if the spiral is counter or anticlockwise? The bush will always be slower or stopped as in neutral position and will be equal speed to the main shaft when finally in 4th.
I think hobot would be interested in this too.
I am going to grab a beer and have a think. Waiting for some comments.
Cheers,
Tom
CNN