I'm the guy who sent in the Amsoil for testing. I was very disappointed that my precious 15w-50 Amsoil Racing Oil did not get top honors....
Anything is possible. I had thoroughly cleaned the tank a couple years before. Prior to that, anyones guess.
That said, even sludge in the tank, settles out of “filtered oil”, barring some lug dumping in dirty oil.
I note the overlay playing has disappeared first by the oil hole positioned where you want maximum bearing material, ie the combustion gives the rod down onto the journal and the oil film thickness is at its thinnest Test of the damage is from dirt and debris in the oil. I fit plain shells on the top, hole gets blocked but you get bearing material where you want it.
I got to say I thoroughly clean my oil tank every oil change. Your oil looks emulsified, water in the bottom of your oil tank? It’s difficult to tell from the photos of course.
I have one of those in my garage. US gallons, mate. Sorry.At first I thought your maths was suspect, after all £240 / 5...?
But then I concluded you are probably referring to it being 5 US gallons, which is just under 4.2 imperial gallons.
If the Royal Purple drum is indeed US gallons, you’re closer to the mark than I was at price per imperial gallon.
Nope. The oil was not emulsified. That is the lighting. That's Amsoil Dominator 60 weight racing oil, changed every 2500 miles. And the bike is RIDDEN, not parade putted...
Actually the highest pressure is on the lower shell.
Most likely not, but as with the rest of us he is in shock that his lovely old machines(children) have not been receiving the 'very best foods' to maintain their health..... I've always had visions of Castrol GTX 20w50 being depicted in the stained glass windows in churches myself. It was afterall the recommended oil when my Norton was a baby.
The shell bearing manufacturers disagree.
Clevite
Typically, a used bearing should exhibit signs of use over 2/3 to 3/4 of its ID surface in the most heavily loaded half (lower main and upper rod halves).
https://www.mahle-aftermarket.com/media/local-media-north-america/pdfs-&-thumbnails/cl77-1-205r.pdf
And money talks, sputter bearings are a very high performance bearing but typically 3 or 4 times the price of a normal shell bearing, so to keep the costs down they are only fitted in the high load positions ie rod upper and main lower halves.
Fitting instructions Sputter bearings are normally only installed on the pressure-loaded side of conrod bearings and main bearings (blue bearing shell). The less loaded anti-thrustside is equipped with conventional two or three-component bearings (yellow bearing shell). If the bearing shells are mixed up during installation, damage to the bearings occurs even after a short running time – as we know from experience.
https://www.techtips.ie/Pierburg/sputter-bearings--design-and--fitting-instructions.pdf
Just to play devil's advocate slightly. I have read that transmission oil can do well in scar type tests but I don't think anyone would want to use it as engine oil.
Jim, have you ever tried transmission oil in your test? It might be interesting.
Ian
I tried both conventional and synthetic ATF. The synthetic was better than the conventional but neither one held more than a small fraction of the load that motor oil did. With low ZDDP it worked about like Aeroshell.
A "classic" scar tester would likely give much different results.
We know that you prefer synthetic AFT in the ACM gearbox. If the ATF oil has weaker oil film than Bel Ray engine oil. Will BelRay engine oil be a better alternative in the gearbox?