o0norton0o
VIP MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2015
- Messages
- 1,769
I have a '70 commando. I've done a lot of modifying and rebuilding to add updated bearings where the originals were known to fail. perhaps I should post the long list of stuff I have done which is everything from adding rear directionals to a bike that had none, adding a ammeter to the headlight shell, sleeving my amals, keegler mod, breathing mod, headsteady, boyer, dynacoil, total rebuild and on and on...
regardless of all the time and money I have put in to make the bike reliable and handle well, do you think that an original untouched bike in decent shape and no modifications is more valuable (for sale) than a bike like mine that has been used more and modified?
I'm just interested in what the consensus is, and why people think one way or the other... Thanks
regardless of all the time and money I have put in to make the bike reliable and handle well, do you think that an original untouched bike in decent shape and no modifications is more valuable (for sale) than a bike like mine that has been used more and modified?
I'm just interested in what the consensus is, and why people think one way or the other... Thanks