I still go by results, not personalities. And I don't need a documentary, a movie or an orange idiot to tell me what I really think. I look at what actually happened, not what someone else said happened to excuse all the Republican fukups and blame them on previous Democrats. As I said, I've heard all that crap before and culled it. Clinton created a good working economy, Bush nearly pushed it over the brink and Obama brought it back. If all you apologists hadn't hated Hilary so bad, Trump wouldn't even be here and this thread wouldn't even exist.n So don't talk about hate. Put up some results or STFU.
What results are you talking about? You haven't posted any results, you just call Trump names.
You said, "I look at what actually happened". Really, you just look out into thin air and you know what happened? I think your method is flawed. Try reading a book or watching one of the documentaries I reccomended.
You've "culled" nothing, because you are probably the most vitriolic uninformed commenter posting their factless comments on this thread here.
Clinton built a house of cards. He wanted to increase home ownership amongst minority groups as a way of helping them break the cycle of living for generations in urban housing projects, He lowered the qualifications for mortgage lending. His appointee at Fanny Mae, Franklin Raines gave mortgage loans to anyone who applied, and then cooked the books to show Fanny Mae was doing well, when in fact they were experiencing record losses.
This substantial increase in mortgage lending created a housing boom, so construction took off, as did salaries for workers. The housing market was so hot, that new home prices skyrocketed and the boom was on,... Unfortunately, Clinton was a moderate enough to play both sides of the isle and he signed the repeal of the glass-steagal act which ended the prohibition of selling uncolateralized debts as investments. Initially banks made money at record pace, so they endorsed the most risky policies to maximize profits, but that didn't last long.
This combination of all these things was the equivilent of a house of cards or more accurately a domino effect based on the fact that they were all going to fail as soon as the first domino fell. When Bush took office, his administration intitially kept the Clinton policies of Fanny Mae because based on the books they were shown, Fanny mae was in no trouble and was helping people buy homes at a record pace. Once the fake books and bad mortgage lending policies at Fanny mae was found out, the first domino had fallen, and the rest of the dominos were all based on those debts having value...
As the mortgage failure rates increased and housing prices tanked, builders went belly up, work ceased and workers had no work to do, there was a huge glut of houses that were in various stages of completion but not sold, banks suffered record losses, and any entity who bought mortgage backed securities either was bailed out by Obama's gift of 700 billion in 2008, or went belly up if they were deemed small enough to let them fail.
Tell me more about how you go by results,... because I don't see a single argument you have made that isn't just your opinion based on your loathing.
You could do some research and learn something. BTW, that "STFU" comment is childish over the internet, and not something you would say to anyone's face, but I guess it fits in with your demenor here pretty well