rvich
VIP MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2009
- Messages
- 3,181
It seems to me that as a Norton owner that I have two needs:
1.) a process by which I may eliminate faulty followers that may cause damage to my engine.
2.) the ability to source new followers.
It would be wonderful if the new followers didn't need to be tested for need number one, but ultimately if I can perform the first then we already have the second. This is not intended to be an argument on my part as to whether or not AN owes us QA. It is only intended to stress that figuring out how to eliminate faulty followers is a worthy effort. If for no other reason than the huge number of them now in circulation.
As for the first need, are the spigoted followers a big enough improvement to reduce the pad separation issue?
Russ
1.) a process by which I may eliminate faulty followers that may cause damage to my engine.
2.) the ability to source new followers.
It would be wonderful if the new followers didn't need to be tested for need number one, but ultimately if I can perform the first then we already have the second. This is not intended to be an argument on my part as to whether or not AN owes us QA. It is only intended to stress that figuring out how to eliminate faulty followers is a worthy effort. If for no other reason than the huge number of them now in circulation.
As for the first need, are the spigoted followers a big enough improvement to reduce the pad separation issue?
Russ