Birmingham Norton Test Ride and Comparison.

Joined
Oct 8, 2018
Messages
114
Country flag
Took a Birmingham Norton Sport for a test ride today. Here are my thoughts on the bike and how it compares to my Donington Norton. Any differences I’ve noticed may not apply to earlier or later bikes.



The two bikes I’m comparing

Birmingham Norton 961 Sport 2023 with 210 miles

Donington Norton 961 SF MKII (Euro3) 2017 with 4500 miles. Open long pipes with decat pipe and recommended upgrades (Bosch coils, Bosch cam sensor, Bosch injectors, Honda relays, Magnecor HT leads, iridium plugs, Jumo head temp sensor) Also the lambda sensors have been removed.

First thing I notice when I start it up is there is less engine noise. I’m not saying it’s quiet, there is still plenty of mechanical noise from the engine, but it is a lot quieter than my SF. I do have difficulty seeing the idiot lights on the clocks, the neutral light is not as bright as mine or any of the other lights.

I also look down and see the tank is not centred around the oil filler cap. So that’s not changes, I spent ages trying to get my SF tank centralised.



Into gear and off we go. Pulls nicely, possible stronger than my SF, but only fractionally. It’s no smoother than my SF, in fact I’m getting more vibrations through to the handlebars than I do on mine. No difference with vibrations to the rest of the bike. Pegs and seat are time and even the bars are OK. I do notice that the gear change is not a smooth, you can feel the change and hear the gearchange.

It is a lovely to ride, brakes are great, good clutch action, engine pulls really well, excellent handling, but that’s the same as my SF. I’ve read they’ve changed the engine and/or riding position for better handling, but I couldn’t tell the difference. The fuelling seems really good, though I his get a couple of times when riding slowly and I rolled off the throttle it spluttered and felt like then engine as about to die, but just saved itself

I’d mentioned handling, but it felt really set up with standard settings. My SF needed plenty of adjustment to suit me, the SF had really hard suspension with standard settings. The forks and rear shocks are different to my SF



I pull over and take a walk around the bike to see what’s the same and what’s different.

Straight away I see the side stand lever has been moved so it’s easier to get to, but I found it harder to put it up. Something you’d get used to.



The key is still ugly, Birmingham Norton should have done something about that!



When you turn it off, it takes about 5 seconds for the clocks to go out. Confused me to start with as didn’t think I’d turn it off. (Video doesn't upload to this)

Lambda sensors have been removed or relocated. They definitely aren’t where they used to be.



Still got the catch bottle and also looks like there is some oil in it!



Still looks a mess behind the engine. Live to starter motor seems to have been rerouted and the primary breather is still old version that is know to leak oil.



So I finish my walk around and get back on to ride back to the shop. It really is a great bike. If you’re in the market for a new Norton Commando you wouldn’t be disappointed. People have mentioned the price. This bike with the deal the have at the moment would cost just over £16k, but only has the carbon mudguard. In 2017 my SF was just under £19k what the duel seat, open pipes and decat pipe were added so even at their full list price with extras it’s what we were paying for them from Donington Norton. Would I exchange my SF for one? No. Only differences I noticed was that the Birmingham Norton has less mechanical noise and it possibly pulls slightly stronger. Birmingham Norton say they have made hundreds of changes, but it is still a new bike and needs to prove it’s reliable and these changes have resolved the issues some owners have experienced.

And this brings me to my last point about the bike that isn’t a problem, but does confuse me. Birmingham Norton go to great lengths to distance their Norton Commando from the Donington Norton Commando. If you look at their website, they have even redesigned the Norton logo in 2020 to show this is the TVS era. So why is their bike covered in the Donington Norton logos? On the tank, on the clocks, on the handlebars, on the seat cover and the one on the engine casing is even earlier. I have to say this baffles me. I’d have expected the new TVS logo everywhere as they say the have redesigned so many new parts. It makes it look like they’ve raided the Donington Norton parts bin!

Is it just me that’s confused by this?



Anyway to finish on a more positive note as the bike deserves this, I really enjoyed riding the Birmingham Norton and I really didn’t want to take it back.
 
Lambda sensors have been removed or relocated. They definitely aren’t where they used to be.
So the ECU is fixed programming with no need for input. Many new motorcycles are like this to pass emissions.


And thanks for the input. I think your last line sums up how we all feel after riding the 961. We overlook the crap because they really are fun to ride.\
 
I do notice that the gear change is not a smooth, you can feel the change and hear the gearchange.
Hi Biker Bore , This will probably get better over time with some break in miles ? You didn't mention the loud primary drive . Is there a improvement in primary noise/knocking ? You mentioned that the powerplant is quieter on the Birmingham Norton . And vibration is about the same ? Thanks for posting !
 
Last edited:
I’m still finding the 1/3 improvements a long stretch. Why they refuse to tell these is baffling to me. Sure, they can claim 300 changes, but to what extent?

Of course they raided the Donington parts bin, that’s why no spares were sold for years. Do you think this test bike is one of the 20 TVS had from Donington ?
 
Hi Biker Bore , This will probably get better over time with some break in miles ? You didn't mention the loud primary drive . Is there a improvement in primary noise/knocking ? You mentioned that the powerplant is quieter on the Birmingham Norton . And vibration is about the same ? Thanks for posting !
I did think some of my observations would be down to being a new engine which is why I mentioned the mileage of both bikes.

As for noise, I'm not sure where it's coming from. I wouldn't say there is knock, but the engine noise is quieter than my SF, but louder than my 1999 HD Dyna.

Vibration, it's not intrusive. It just felt slightly more to the bars than my SF.
 
I’m still finding the 1/3 improvements a long stretch. Why they refuse to tell these is baffling to me. Sure, they can claim 300 changes, but to what extent?

Of course they raided the Donington parts bin, that’s why no spares were sold for years. Do you think this test bike is one of the 20 TVS had from Donington ?
I think it was a new build. It had only recently been registered for the road.
 
Great write-up BB. Let’s hope we can get a few more from test rides and of course from those who have purchased.

We have at least two on the site I think. No doubt more to follow. 👍
 
It is indeed most likely a newly-built bike:
- VIN number (is it unit number 185, or even 1850? - probably not the latter)
- the upper clamp is of the new design with a recess, reportedly for enabling the dismounting of the fuel tank. Something I read on here somewhere, but have yet to check myself.

As for the oil filler tower, I have the same exact off-centre position on our Classic when you look at the fuel tank from above, but it seems to me not as an issue with the fuel tank being off, rather than the position of the filler pipe welded slightly off-centre on the top of the frame. It is both slightly surprising and comforting to see it repeated on 2023 models. Anyway, it is the only visual blemish on our own bike and I had to embrace it. I explain it to myself as proof of the frame being welded by hand. Fine by me, no worries.
 
It is indeed most likely a newly-built bike:
- VIN number (is it unit number 185, or even 1850? - probably not the latter)
- the upper clamp is of the new design with a recess, reportedly for enabling the dismounting of the fuel tank. Something I read on here somewhere, but have yet to check myself.

As for the oil filler tower, I have the same exact off-centre position on our Classic when you look at the fuel tank from above, but it seems to me not as an issue with the fuel tank being off, rather than the position of the filler pipe welded slightly off-centre on the top of the frame. It is both slightly surprising and comforting to see it repeated on 2023 models. Anyway, it is the only visual blemish on our own bike and I had to embrace it. I explain it to myself as proof of the frame being welded by hand. Fine by me, no worries.
Hi CR961 , Do you have a Birmingham Norton 961 ? Can you get a electrical schematic for us here on the site ? I would like to compare them to ours . Thanks !
 
Hi CR961 , Do you have a Birmingham Norton 961 ? Can you get an electrical schematic for us here on the site ? I would like to compare them to ours . Thanks !
CR961 has a 961 Classic, they were built before Birmingham announced the full on re introduction of the 961. So, actually, we don’t know how similar they are to the current production models, or not.
 
Yes, that is true. There are some differences which are emerging after looking at the bike above, some cosmetic, others more profound!
Classic:
- all black everything, wheels, forks, top yoke, instrument panel
- all carbon extras, today offered as options
- different side stand, the helper stub is located right at the base plate
- lambda sensors present just upstream of the catalyst, whereas they are actually blanked off on the bike above
- at 600 miles, our Classic has no oil in the catch bottle, but we are making up for that with discoloured clutch fluid

If I can see this much, I should think there are other details which are different.
The main question, of course, is the nature of the internals, fuel injection, ECU, gearbox.
 
I had a test ride on a TVS 961 about a month ago.... and was very impressed. The bike was showing 245 miles on the clock and ran brilliantly. The throttle, clutch and gearchange were all super smooth... handled brilliantly and fuelled perfectly around town... no problems with a dodgy tickover...Still the same noisy start up but the engine was much quieter than my old Garner 961 -still a little clattery but not as bad and also had a 'whirring' sound when revved at a standstill. The exhaust sounded good but not as good as my old one with a decat pipe. ( hope someone makes decat pipes for the new ones ). I loved it... so much so, i ordered one.... (oh dear:eek: ). And just to say that with the deal Norton have on at the moment, the paintwork stripes, black engine, polished cases and fancy seat are all included in the price... saving a fair bit of money if you prefer that stuff.
 
Last edited:
Im hoping the less noise is because they opened up the oil pump orifice. so the top end is oiled correctly
 
I had a test ride on a TVS 961 about a month ago.... and was very impressed. The bike was showing 245 miles on the clock and ran brilliantly. The throttle, clutch and gearchange were all super smooth... handled brilliantly and fuelled perfectly around town... no problems with a dodgy tickover...Still the same noisy start up but the engine was much quieter than my old Garner 961 -still a little clattery but not as bad and also had a 'whirring' sound when revved at a standstill. The exhaust sounded good but not as good as my old one with a decat pipe. ( hope someone makes decat pipes for the new ones ). I loved it... so much so, i ordered one.... (oh dear:eek: ). And just to say that with the deal Norton have on at the moment, the paintwork stripes, black engine, polished cases and fancy seat are all included in the price... saving a fair bit of money if you prefer that stuff.
The website only says a £125 contribution still.
Am I missing something 961al?
 
I had a test ride on a TVS 961 about a month ago.... and was very impressed. The bike was showing 245 miles on the clock and ran brilliantly. The throttle, clutch and gearchange were all super smooth... handled brilliantly and fuelled perfectly around town... no problems with a dodgy tickover...Still the same noisy start up but the engine was much quieter than my old Garner 961 -still a little clattery but not as bad and also had a 'whirring' sound when revved at a standstill. The exhaust sounded good but not as good as my old one with a decat pipe. ( hope someone makes decat pipes for the new ones ). I loved it... so much so, i ordered one.... (oh dear:eek: ). And just to say that with the deal Norton have on at the moment, the paintwork stripes, black engine, polished cases and fancy seat are all included in the price... saving a fair bit of money if you prefer that stuff.
Good for you !

Whats the ETA ?
 
Paul (850 Commando) This is the one i test rode from Oakmere Cheshire dealer... and when i ordered they said it would be to the same spec as this one...they are saying the offer (for July only ) is £961 deposit contribution, £750 px allowance and £150 accessory allowance.... Birmingham Norton Test Ride and Comparison.
 
Last edited:
All the bikes at the dealer I went to had the options fitted except for carbon pack. Think there was 2 silver sports, 2 black sports, one being the demo. They also had a cafe racer, but I was told they are not available until September. Price of a silver sport with carbon pack was £17,288.

I'm assuming when the existing dealer stocks with options already fitted are sold you'll have to start paying for the option as they'll be built to order.
 
Back
Top