A list of bikes with NO redeeming value would surely be the list of top 5 dogs!So why should ANYONE care what some other person thinks are the "most over-rated" bikes? In most cases, he contradicts himself by saying they actually are quite nice, etc. A truly over-rated bike has little to no redeeming value.
Very well putA list of bikes with NO redeeming value would surely be the list of top 5 dogs!
But ‘over rated classics’ is a good thought provoking list, ie why should a Goldie be worth twice the price of a faster/ smoother / easier to live with Gold Flash? Why should a pre unit T120 be twice the price of a 650ss?
Or perhaps the ultimate for me would be why is the Rocket Gold Start 3 or 4 times the price of the best Gold Flash?!
But, interesting debate aside, the answer is actually very simple: market forces.
And the markets valuation of collectables actually has almost nothing to do with their practical merit. Never has. Probably never will.
If ALL we were interested in was practical merit, we’d all be riding modern Japanese bikes ! Or worse… for many it would be some horrid electric device
You’d think so wouldn’t you…Looking for rational explanations for emotional decisions is always going to be a waste of time.
You don't buy a Gold Star to ride in traffic or expecting a smooth civilised machine like a Gold Flash. That's the whole point!
Your trying to bring logic into it !You’d think so wouldn’t you…
I am frequently surprised but those I see who’ve bought Goldies and then ‘upgraded‘ them with touring bars and pegs, low compression, and sensible carb.
Kinda like a B33…
And you sound like my Missus …Your trying to bring logic into it !
"They all do that...."And you sound like my Missus …
A mate of mine did almost exactly thatYou’d think so wouldn’t you…
I am frequently surprised but those I see who’ve bought Goldies and then ‘upgraded‘ them with touring bars and pegs, low compression, and sensible carb.
Kinda like a B33…