Which is correct? For my own edification.

Joined
Jul 28, 2011
Messages
48
I'm waiting on the title to come in, and I'm trying to figure out which is the correct VIN for the bike. On the motor it's laid out like: 0/116xxx/P but on the Frame it's a little different. It's like this:

20
1
1
6
x
x
x

I'm just trying to figure out what'll be on the title. Will it be 0/116xxx/P, 20116xxx, or 116xxx?

Thanks!
 
The VIN on the frame is generally the VIN number.
So its 20/116xxx

But should about be the same as the motor number anyway.
Your motor number should be 20/ , since the 20 is the model type for Atlas
(and Commando 750).

The /P on the end of the engine number says it was made in Plumstead.
 
Rohan said:
The /P on the end of the engine number says it was made in Plumstead.

The P is actually a year marker. P being 1959. It would have been made at Bracebridge Street, B'ham. They were there until 1963.

Ian..
 
Nortoniggy said:
Rohan said:
The /P on the end of the engine number says it was made in Plumstead.

The P is actually a year marker. P being 1959. It would have been made at Bracebridge Street, B'ham. They were there until 1963.

Ian..

That's interesting. The bike is a 66 (at least it's been titled that way for the past 30 years), so if it was only made through 63, I've got an issue.
 
Very interesting indeed. My number was 20117069. Same year and model as yours. I didn't notice the other number, or a letter after the engine number. I checked the pics and it does not seem that there is one.
 
Jimmy_P said:
Nortoniggy said:
Rohan said:
The /P on the end of the engine number says it was made in Plumstead.

The P is actually a year marker. P being 1959. It would have been made at Bracebridge Street, B'ham. They were there until 1963.

Ian..

That's interesting. The bike is a 66 (at least it's been titled that way for the past 30 years), so if it was only made through 63, I've got an issue.


/P at the end of the engine number indicates that the engine was assembled in Plumstead. If it was the P year marker for 1959 then it would be stamped adjacent to the model code on the frame, however as it is an Atlas (20 = Atlas) then it couldn't be 1959 anyway as the model wasn't available before late 1962.
 
Britbikemike, the P is only on the engine, I'm not sure if you were looking at the frame number or engine number.

L.A.B. - That makes sense to me. I know it's an atlas, although for quite some time people told my dad it was an "Atlas II". I've never found any reference to that.

So, the title for mine should read 20116xxx...After doing some searching, I found that the P could refer to 1959, but only if it's for the year code for models between 1946 and 1960, after that it goes to the manufacture city, Plumstead (as indicated). The 20/ says it's an atlas, and the serial number falls in the 1966 range 115870 - 119759 (just like your's Mike). Now I've got it. Good info, really. Thanks!
 
Jimmy_P said:
I know it's an atlas, although for quite some time people told my dad it was an "Atlas II". I've never found any reference to that.

A number of changes were made from '66 serial number 116372 (double speed oil pump and high pressure rocker feed etc.) so perhaps they were considered to be Atlas MkII models?
After all, the Commando was originally going to be called the "Atlas MkIII" (apparently that is why the early Commando model code was "20M3" = Atlas Mark 3) so there should have been a "MkII" Atlas!
 
Which is correct? For my own edification.
I don't see a P on it but it could be covered up still and I just missed it.
 
L.A.B. said:
That's interesting. The bike is a 66 (at least it's been titled that way for the past 30 years), so if it was only made through 63, I've got an issue.


/P at the end of the engine number indicates that the engine was assembled in Plumstead. If it was the P year marker for 1959 then it would be stamped adjacent to the model code on the frame, however as it is an Atlas (20 = Atlas) then it couldn't be 1959 anyway as the model wasn't available before late 1962.

You're right of course. I should have twigged that there were not Atlas's that early. My brain has been elsewhere lately. I blame the heat, or maybe I banged my head when i got knocked off my Commando & didn't realise. Or it could just be senility.

Ian
 
britbikemike said:
I don't see a P on it but it could be covered up still and I just missed it.

The /P for made in Plumstead didn't last for ever - it was dropped after a while, the Dealers knew by then where it was made.

BTW, it was said it appeared because stuff made in Plumstead was different dimensions, the blueprints supposedly hadn't been updated in years, and the Plumstead machinists didn't know how they were supposed to be made (don't believe the blueprints, they need to be like this !).
Apparently heads wouldn't fit on cylinders, and cylinders wouldn't fit crankcases, etc...
 
Rohan said:
britbikemike said:
...BTW, it was said it appeared because stuff made in Plumstead was different dimensions, the blueprints supposedly hadn't been updated in years, and the Plumstead machinists didn't know how they were supposed to be made (don't believe the blueprints, they need to be like this !).
Apparently heads wouldn't fit on cylinders, and cylinders wouldn't fit crankcases, etc...

This is scary!
 
20/116xxx would be correct for a '66 atlas. I've seen about a dozen over the past year, and on some engines the '2' isn't fully stamped because of the curvature of the engine case. On my '68 title, they didn't put the slash. in '72 Norton stopped using model prefixes, as they were only building the Commando by then. This is also why there's a jump in serial numbers, with 1972 starting at 200001.


I think due to internal issues with AMC's consolidating of manufacturing to try to stave off bankruptcy, assembly of Matchless, AJS and Norton moved around. In the early '60s, Engines were assembled at Wolverhampton, Frames were made at Manchester, and final assembly was at the Plumstead works. Some engines were assembled at Plumstead, and those were stamped with a 'P'. Some think that Plumstead engines were superior, as this was where all the AMC competition engines were built.
AMC went bankrupt in 1966, and Manganeze Bronze bought the company, which became Norton-Villiers. Matchless and AJS bikes were reduced to Norton-powered machines (G15s, Model 33s, and Matchless-badged P11s), AJS 2-strokes and leftover singles. By the fall of 1968, Matchless was done, AJS was later sold off and concentrated on small 2-strokes, and Plumstead was shuttered by the summer of '69.
Norton production moved to Andover for some final assembly, with most manufacturing of engines and parts, and the balance of final assembly continuing at Wolverhampton. I know Manchester was the original origin of the isolastic frame, but don't know when production at Manchester stopped.
 
BillT said:
Some think that Plumstead engines were superior, as this was where all the AMC competition engines were built.

This is a bit of a stretch Bill, the AMC Competition shop built the competition engines.

And until 1963, all Nortons were built by Nortons, at Nortons in Birmingham.

The problems with Nortons built in Plumstead after the move in 1963 was that the machinery was all moved to Plumstead (?), but the operators weren't. At Nortons, the story also goes that the operators knew how the machinery was worn, so added all the suitable wooden chocks etc to get the dimensions and clearances right. It took the folks at Plumstead quite a while to get this all sorted out. Meanwhile, amending the designs to remove things like cylinders spiggotted into the head eventually improved production - and things fitting together...

What was at Manchester ? Got any details ?
 
Rohan said:
What was at Manchester ?

The frames were made by Reynolds Tubing. I've heard "Manchester" mentioned before, but I'm not sure what the connection is to Reynolds or why they would choose to build frames there instead of Birmingham?
 
Back
Top