I was always under the impression trimming the expander to make the three piece unit fit easier was a big no, no as their ends have to butt precisely to work.B+Bogus said:One potential pitfall is that the expander needs checking for gap as well as the rings themselves - I've had to trim them in the past... after I found it difficult getting the barrels past the oil rings :wink:
One potential pitfall is that the expander needs checking for gap as well as the rings themselves - I've had to trim them in the past... after I found it difficult getting the barrels past the oil rings :wink:
kerinorton said:One potential pitfall is that the expander needs checking for gap as well as the rings themselves - I've had to trim them in the past... after I found it difficult getting the barrels past the oil rings :wink:
Absolute fucking bullshit.
There is nothing wrong with using those 3 or 4 pc oil rings. You just have to KNOW what you are doing when fitting them.
You don't gap the expander. NUTs.
generally you will find there is good clearance on the wipers. There is no problem having a so called wider gap with these rings. I do always check their gaps anyway to make they have some. [ more than the one pcs ones ]
Wanker
B+Bogus said:kerinorton said:One potential pitfall is that the expander needs checking for gap as well as the rings themselves - I've had to trim them in the past... after I found it difficult getting the barrels past the oil rings :wink:
Absolute fucking bullshit.
There is nothing wrong with using those 3 or 4 pc oil rings. You just have to KNOW what you are doing when fitting them.
You don't gap the expander. NUTs.
generally you will find there is good clearance on the wipers. There is no problem having a so called wider gap with these rings. I do always check their gaps anyway to make they have some. [ more than the one pcs ones ]
Wanker
Do I know you? :roll:
B+Bogus said:For the sake of clarity, this isn't new to me - I've fitted many 3-piece rings in over 30 years and I wholeheartedly agree that they should never need to be messed with in any way.
But what do you do when the piston simply won't fit in the bore otherwise?
It may be a quality escape, but I didn't dive into this without checking my facts first - you've either encountered this issue, or you haven't!
Evidently I'm not the only one either.
Furthermore my bikes don't smoke.
....And to apply the pressure against the walls needed to seal the bores whilst at the same time any oil that finds it's way between the rails to drain to the inside of the piston. I suppose there could be instances where an oil control expander was packaged wrong, say a part meant for an over size bore finding it's way into a standard set, that would be real obvious though and go back to the vender. Are the guys who are trimming these things using ring compressors or just fingernails to work the rings in?Beach said:B+Bogus said:For the sake of clarity, this isn't new to me - I've fitted many 3-piece rings in over 30 years and I wholeheartedly agree that they should never need to be messed with in any way.
I also think main reason for the expander is to keep the scraper rings separated....
Biscuit said:....And to apply the pressure against the walls needed to seal the bores whilst at the same time any oil that finds it's way between the rails to drain to the inside of the piston. I suppose there could be instances where an oil control expander was packaged wrong, say a part meant for an over size bore finding it's way into a standard set, that would be real obvious though and go back to the vender. Are the guys who are trimming these things using ring compressors or just fingernails to work the rings in?Beach said:B+Bogus said:For the sake of clarity, this isn't new to me - I've fitted many 3-piece rings in over 30 years and I wholeheartedly agree that they should never need to be messed with in any way.
I also think main reason for the expander is to keep the scraper rings separated....