MK# front master cylinder, fine details please.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Oct 28, 2014
Messages
1,856
Country flag
Please, blow by blow, explain the master cylinder operation. I am working on a MK3 front brake and I cannot get good brake pressure. sitting right next to it is another MK3 with excellent front brake and I have to know the difference. I am convinced that every single air bubble has been bled out. There is not the usual problem of the inboard piston being shoved too far in.
There are no leaks anywhere. None to the outside, anyway.
How does the two small holes in the reservoir work?
What is the symptom of weak seals in the MC?
The lever comes 2/3rd of the way back to the grip before it stops. Braking at this point is minimal. The lever never touches the grip. I placed two washers (temporarily) between the lever and the piston in the MC, preloading the thing. This improved matters as to lever position, don't know about braking force yet, it is still raining. What is going on? Also, in the morning both brakes need a couple of pumps to build them up again.
 
If they need two pumps there must be air still in the system. The other possibility I guess is a perished pipe expanding when you pull the lever. If you have a standard master cylinder I strongly suggest the re sleeve conversion, by Madass or RGM. Makes a world of difference to stock braking for not much money.
 
Use the search option or look on Google/YouTube for reverse brake bleeding using a syringe to push fluid in at the bleed nipple an air out of the master cylinder.
 
Air.
Unbolt the master from the handlebar, position it so the piston is vertical. Pump the brake. If it still doesn't firm up, let it sit overnight in that position. Then, pump. Return to horizontal. Think like an air bubble. Remember "The Fantastic Voyage" movie? :D
 
A weak brake can also be from a stuck piston in the caliper. I'm not sure exactly if my brake problem was from rust or dirt, but my brakes worked fine, but suddenly weakened because the caliper piston was sticking and would only go outward so far. Once the pad wore down, all of a sudden I had a weak brake, then no brakes. The lever felt fine. I came up to a stop light in traffic, grabbed the brake and had NO brakes. I had to run down the shoulder of the road in order to avoid hitting the car in front of me when my front brake unexpectedly didn't work. My rear brake saved me from rolling into the intersection against the light.

I went home and did the inspection and found that the front wheel spun on the center stand and even though squeezing the lever felt correct, the caliper was sticking somehow and wasn't squeezing the disk. NO Brakes! Check the caliper too... parts are cheap compared to hospital bills... good braking is essential.
 
according to the Lockheed service guide mentioned above....when installed, the square section Oring on the caliper piston will actually be slightly proud on the fluid side and I suppose, flush on the disc side. So I have the 2 Orings in hand and it seems impossible to see any high or low side. It seems a lot easier to make a rubber Oring with a taper than to machine a tapered groove deep in a caliper. I will have to use the old method of trial and error, fit it and see which side is proud and be ready to pull it out and reinstall the other way around. However, there is some risk of damage when removing the seal. If Lockheed has machined the groove in the caliper there could never be a mistake. It would only be a few thousandths taper. Before I remove the caliper, does anyone know which part has the taper? Sorry for the nit-picking but it's important for the brakes.
 
Hi seattle##gs, there is no high or low side on the seal, they are square. It's the groove in the caliper which gives it it's shape, so you can put the seals in either way around.

Cheers,

cliffa.
 
MK# front master cylinder, fine details please.
 
excellent...so there is no way I can make a mistake provided that the groove is spotlessly clean. Thank you, Lockheed, for doing this correctly.
 
I boiled out my caliper in an old saucepan with a bit of detergent & vinegar added. Then I used a piece of aluminium strip about 15mm. wide and about 1.5mm thick, cut off about 30º at the end, then bent over 10mm down. You can work it around the corners of the seal grooves without fear of gouging them. While you have it apart you should also ensure that all the drillings are clear. I opened out the main feed hole (under the hose connection) with a 3.5mm drill, as mine was severely restricted.

Cheers,

cliffa
 
good ideas. I didn't realize the passageway to the inboard piston ever got blocked up. This is the fine details I asked for. Any tips for the master cylinder?
 
Hobot used to talk about taking a hot nail and burning out /enlarging the rubber restrictor . Something about enlarging the restrictor hole as disc brakes were a new idea and for legal liability reasons no one wanted them to lock a disc brake up with all that new-found pressure. Have yet to meet an owner who tried this.
 
I submitted this before.
This is from a personal email reply I sent hobot about his Norton front brake master cylinder brake upgrade (hot nail through the rubber piece). He asked that I post it public, I included his reply at the bottom.

Me:
Sorry I did not reply back sooner. I wanted to do your upgrade and get some riding time on it for evulation of the difference. Plus I am not known here so I get no private messages and don't even think to look here for them.
Well I did do your upgrade, but only partially evualted the difference. I haven't gotten in very many rides on it since then (lots of different reasons) but at least enough for an initial aprisal. However I cannot make a true direct comparison as there were other factors also. This is what I did.
My Norton (1974 850) had a master cylinder leak since I got it (2 years ago). It did not leak too bad, but every once in a while the front brake lever would go all the way to the grip with no resistanse (scarry sensation). The next pull or two would restablish fluid pressure and it would hold good pressure. So it was ridable as long as space was left in case the first pull failed. But the cylinder did need fixing, so that was done along with your upgrade. The cylinder was cleaned then honed out with fine sandpaper (it had some rust and lots of crud but mostly in the area not swept by the piston). It looked good after I was finished. The piston was pretty rough and rusty (about 1/2 of it) but it also cleaned up ok. I cleaned everything up real good. I got a brake kit from Old Brits and replaced the rubber parts. I then did your upgrade on the old black rubber part with the hot 6 penny nail and put it all back together. I also took the front wheel brake disk off and used a "scott brit" pad on my drill to deglase the disk on both sides. I am no expert on doing that so I hope I did it right. I haven't noticed any puslating so it is probably ok.
So the master cylinder was brought back to normal and the disk deglased along with your upgrade.

My initial finding from the short rides I have done are positive, but not as rosy as your postings. I have found that now it does indeed stop better. I can now even lock up the front wheel if I pull very very very hard. Before that was not possible at all, you could get maybe 1/2 as much stoppage as that, plus it felt totally wooden as they say. It does stop much more evenly now too. Before it seemed to stop somewhat ok at first but then less well as it slowed down (like the same pressure was not slowing it down any further), requiring even harder pulling to get it to stop fully. The stopping distance is now a good bit less, somewhere between 1/3 and 1/2, depending on how hard I pull. It does take less pull to stop, but is by no means an easy pull. The lever still has to be pulled hard, very hard for fast stops. Before it had to be pulled very hard to stop at all. But compared to my 2007 Bonneville, you have to pull more than twice as hard on the Norton. Plus the modulation is way better on the Bonneville, meaning I can lightly change how much pressure and immedeatly feel the difference. The Norton still can't match that, you have to pull hard and pulling harder doesen't have as much effect. It is still more of a on/off brake than a modern. I know I didn't explain that part very well. There is definate improvement. I can't say how much came from any one part of what I did. It is now much much better than it was and is far safer to ride. Before I had to leave lots of room to stop, now I can ride with normal traffic spacing confidently. Thank you for sharing your upgrade with me. The only thing I am dissapointed with is still having to pull so hard. From your posts I was expecting 2 finger operation like my Bonneville. I have a good grip so it is no problem to pull hard, just was looking forward to more, plus I worry that someday I will forget which one I am on and pull the Bonnie's lever at Norton strength and crash. Anyway I do thank your for your help, it has made a big difference. I may still get a sleeved master cylinder later, but for now I will stick with this upgrade and see how it feels as I get more used to it.

hobot:
Alrighty David you got about as much as one can expect form the factory hydraulic ratio do appreciate hearing how much just a bigger hole makes for actually having a lockable brake. Its somewhat a safety feature it takes so much effort to squeal at good speed but guarantee if a panic need arises it wont hardly noticed. I got a decent grip so not much a bother to me to squeal at will. Next thing to improve the ease is get something like the RGM race lever and SS hose. Do not mistake ease of squeaze with actual stopping distance once a loud squeal or lock up can be had then that's all there is from two fingers or ham fisted grab. Once pistons or pucks get rusty they are more prone to re-rust and mess with bore pitting. Your email would be fun to read on forum with a title like hobot brake mod let down : )

mightydaj, Feb 23, 2015
 
Has anyone else tried this modification?
It looks like the "rubber valve base" sits in the bottom of the cylinder for the duration of its useful life. Doesn't move at all. Correct? It's only function is to slow up the hydraulic fluid going in and out. Why this is necessary I don't know.
The secondary cup's function, I imagine, is a back up for the first cup which does all the pushing. The secondary keeps any fluid from leaking to the outside. Correct?
At rest, the primary cup's lead edge has to leave both holes in the reservoir open, correct?
What is the function of the primary cup washer?
Should there be any fluid between the primary and secondary cup except for tiny amounts or should this space be filled?
I have rebuilt several master cylinders, just replacing parts, but I do not have a deep understanding of them, hence the title of this topic.
 
Has anyone else tried this modification?
It looks like the "rubber valve base" sits in the bottom of the cylinder for the duration of its useful life. Doesn't move at all.

Correct?

According to the Triumph T140 manual description of the master cylinder's operation, the check valve can lift off its seat when the brake is released so fluid can return around the outside of the valve (the valve has gaps in its periphery where fluid can flow past when raised from its seat).

From the Triumph manual:

".......fluid returning from the wheel cylinder lifts the check valve away from its seat and re-enters the cylinder."



It's only function is to slow up the hydraulic fluid going in and out. Why this is necessary I don't know.

Again, according to the Triumph manual, the check valve is there as an aid to bleeding the brake.

From the Triumph manual:
"The purpose of the check valve is to prevent the re-entry into the master cylinder of fluid pumped into the line during the "bleeding" operation, thus ensuring a fresh charge of fluid at each stroke of the lever."


The secondary cup's function, I imagine, is a back up for the first cup which does all the pushing. The secondary keeps any fluid from leaking to the outside. Correct?

Yes.


At rest, the primary cup's lead edge has to leave both holes in the reservoir open, correct?

Yes. (although the primary cup only covers/uncovers the smaller "bleed" port)


Should there be any fluid between the primary and secondary cup except for tiny amounts or should this space be filled?

Yes, it should be full of fluid, because.....

From the AP Lockheed manual:

"On releasing the brake(s) the return spring moves the piston back faster than the fluid can return and this causes the lip of the main rubber cup to relax and fluid passes over the cup from behind, through the holes drilled in the piston head for this purpose."
 
Last edited:
the "primary cup washer" has a convex side and a concave side..sort of. I assume the convex side faces the primary cup and the concave side faces the steel plunger. Am I right?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top