Lifters question (2015)

Bob Z.

Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
624
Country flag
I thought I'd start a new thread to ask more questions about lifter installation.
The recent discussion on lifter pairs did not have any photos.

Here is a photo of two sets that have been in my storage for many years.
For what I remember they were removed from the cylinders and stored in the original sets as shown.

Note that each set has one pair with forward bevel on bottom and one pair without.
Is this correct?

They all have vertical grooves on the leading side and not on the rear side.
Note that the set on the right side of photo shows the rear view without the vertical groove.
Is the vertical groove on the leading side for oil drain down from the push rod tunnel?

Lifters question (2015)
 
Bob Z. said:
I thought I'd start a new thread to ask more questions about lifter installation.
The recent discussion on lifter pairs did not have any photos.

Here is a photo of two sets that have been in my storage for many years.
For what I remember they were removed from the cylinders and stored in the original sets as shown.

Note that each set has one pair with forward bevel on bottom and one pair without.
Is this correct?

They all have vertical grooves on the leading side and not on the rear side.
Note that the set on the right side of photo shows the rear view without the vertical groove.
Is the vertical groove on the leading side for oil drain down from the push rod tunnel?

Lifters question (2015)
Click to expand...

Yes, the beveled groove is for oil return past the lifter.
I have seen the installed with the groove at the rear and it causes extra wear to the bore in the barrel. Jim
 
Jim, if the oil flow is obstructed by fitting the followers the wrong way around, does that shag the camshaft lobes ?
 
The oil still drains out a backwards installed bevel but will not flow where most needed on liter bore and cam lobes.
 
I've never seen any with a bevel ground on the bottom. I don't know if some earlier models do or not. To be clear, I'm talking about the example on the left, the stellite pad.
 
Biscuit said:
I've never seen any with a bevel ground on the bottom. I don't know if some earlier models do or not. To be clear, I'm talking about the example on the left, the stellite pad.
Click to expand...

Earlier lifters had the bevel ground on the stelite pad. It has no effect unless you are trying to use them with a big cam -then you may have a problem if the contact extends beyond the flat part. Jim
 
comnoz said:
Earlier lifters had the bevel ground on the stelite pad. It has no effect unless you are trying to use them with a big cam -then you may have a problem if the contact extends beyond the flat part. Jim
Click to expand...

Going way back here Jim, but by "big" cam, what are you thinking? I have a nice set of these I'd like to use with a Combat cam. Would that be considered too big, or are you talking more than that? Any easy was to check how they are matching up against the cam? Could I put the barrel and lifters on with some machinists blue dye! Thanks!
 
Can someone please point out on this image of the lifters the stelite pad that delamination occurs to as my 850 had this occur recently. I'm guessing it's the cup the pushrod sits in?
Stripping engine shortly and it would help when I'm trying to find the bit that broke off. Much appreciated

Cheers
James
 
The hard base pad that contacts the camshaft lobes can detach from the follower/lifter main body.
These are the original followers out of my Mk2a.

Lifters question (2015)
 
Last edited:
Time Warp said:
The hard base pad that contacts the camshaft lobes can detach from the follower/lifter main body.
These are the original followers out of my Mk2a.
Click to expand...

Interesting see that beveled follower as original to a MK2a. I've seen them mentioned as earlier. I've found the completely flat ones in a '72 Combat - not the one I'm currently working on.
 
For lifters without the slant bevel on one side of the face, is there a correct direction to install them? Or is there no front or back side?

I don’t have a set out to see for myself if there is a difference.
 
Looks like the only way to verify this is to take the head off and look down the pushrod tunnel for the bevel facing forward.
I probably won’t do this, just check at the next opportunity the head needs to come off.


Lifter bore is oiled by gravity i believe, not pressure somehow from the barrel/crankcase/bevel. So oil will still get down the bore.
 
Last edited:
I don't think you could see it with the head off. The barrel would have to come off.
I have seen them installed backwards. It tends to wear a ridge on the thrust side of the lifter bore.
 
Since I originally posed the question to Jim about the beveled edges, I may have stumbled across the answer. Which I should have thought of earlier. I'm currently using a Dunstall barrel that I'm pulling off at least until I can look at making some repairs to it. The Dunstall lifters look very similar in size and shape to the lifters that have the bevels on the edges as seen in the far LH side of the picture on post number two. Should be good.
 
comnoz said:
I don't think you could see it with the head off. The barrel would have to come off.
I have seen them installed backwards. It tends to wear a ridge on the thrust side of the lifter bore.
Click to expand...

With a flat face lifter, it sounds like the lifter needs to be removed from the bore in order to see if the bevel side is installed to the front. I was hoping i could see it by lifting the barrel off the case an inch or two, head still attached. But doubt it will drop down far enough to see.☹️
 
Brithit said:
Interesting see that beveled follower as original to a MK2a. I've seen them mentioned as earlier. I've found the completely flat ones in a '72 Combat - not the one I'm currently working on.
Click to expand...

I dug them out, those must be the originals out of my 71 and was just a picture from long ago in this PC.

Here are the Mk2a followers, very good faces with no bevels but the sides show some form of galling (The camshaft T/S journal and bush were corrugated but lobes near perfect)

Lifters question (2015)
 
elefantrider said:
With a flat face lifter, it sounds like the lifter needs to be removed from the bore in order to see if the bevel side is installed to the front. I was hoping i could see it by lifting the barrel off the case an inch or two, head still attached. But doubt it will drop down far enough to see.☹️
Click to expand...

Actually if they are broken in to the cam as they are I would probably leave them alone. If you change position now you will be risking damage to the cam.
 
comnoz said:
Actually if they are broken in to the cam as they are I would probably leave them alone. If you change position now you will be risking damage to the cam.
Click to expand...

The engine I am working on has the lifters on the right side with the bevels facing the correct way and the left side pair have the bevels facing toward the locating tab.
I hear the advice to leave them alone, but if I am having them resurfaced (cam is being replaced) would it then be prudent to reverse the pair on the left?
 
NickZ said:
The engine I am working on has the lifters on the right side with the bevels facing the correct way and the left side pair have the bevels facing toward the locating tab.
I hear the advice to leave them alone, but if I am having them resurfaced (cam is being replaced) would it then be prudent to reverse the pair on the left?
Click to expand...
If the followers are a good fit in the bore when you have corrected their position, and you are getting them refaced I reckon they'd be fine
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top