I have always wondered how valve lash clearances are determined. 1970 Triumph T120R: .002" intake, .004" exhaust. 1967 Royal Enfield Interceptor: Intake, nil, exhaust nil to .004 (manual says to set exhausts at .004" for extended "high speed" running. Norton 750 Commando, non Combat .006" intake, .008" exhaust, standard factory cam, .008" intake & .010" exhaust, Combat.
All my examples have cast iron barrels and aluminum heads, with alloy pushrods. Do the pushrods grow at a greater rate than the head/barrel combination? What about setting the valve lash at near zero (.001/,002) wit engine at full operating temperature? Does the cams' acceleration ramp play into lash? I would think that any clearance would be subject to resonance at some RPM, don't know. I can see that the lash dimension would dictate when and where the tappet (or cam) would make contact with the acceleration ramp and where it would "disconnect" from the deceleration ramp; is the lash dimension a general protection for manufacturing tolerance? Wouldn't you want more lash on a motorcycle that haunts the streets of Phoenix, AZ versus the streets of Boston, MA?
The manufacturer of any cam I've installed supplies the lash dimension, I remember a friend in the 60s installing a Duntov cam in a small block V-8 using .030" for both intake and exhaust, what noise. Is lash a dimension that can be calculated? How much lash is equal to a degree of advance/retard? I can see the consequences of too tight and too loose, but in many cases there is a lot to (potentially) play with.