NORTSTER1974
VIP MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2015
- Messages
- 274
Yes Concours, it sure as hell was more exhilarating than riding an 850 Commando. The HP and torque made up for the weight gain. Gotta go, the fields ae not done, and I'm late for dinner.
I rode one the first year they came out, whenever that was. The dealer promo was "Ride the Rocket 3 and get a free T shirt". They said they were as fast as a Hyabusa from 0-60. Dealer wouldn't let you ride it too far, good for him, probably would have killed myself. It was the fastest bike I ever rode. All the weight just disappeared with a crack of the throttle. I did think of buying one, just so I could plow the fields quicker, and get home to dinner sooner. I still have the T shirt and I'm always late for dinner.
"If I have to explain it, you wouldn't understand"I'm a motorcycle rider - not a tractor driver!
Can you explain the advantage the extra 1700cc (FFS!) gives you?
Rear wheel numbers.
NA vs SC. (NA= Normally Aspirated (ie stock). SC = SuperCharged (plus other mods))
View attachment 117295
Your right Al. Low power bikes are faster.When I was a kid, a dealer offered to sell me a new Aprilia 250 production racer. I would not even look at it. We all wanted big motorcycles. I once rode an early Rocket 3. It stood up on it's rear wheel easier then any other bike I ever rode. However that does not mean it was fast. I suspect the weight distribution was wrong. I bike which is light in the front, is more difficult to ride fast. I suspect most of us when we ride a motorcycle probably believe the manufacturer knows how to design a motorcycle. So we just ride it and adapt to it. If it is not fast enough, we blame engine power - and NOT it's handling.
Theoretically, a Norvin should be very fast - best motor in the best frame ? - Bullshit !
There is a video on Youtube of a Rocket 3 racing on the IOM. It does not look good to me. I know what the rider must have been feeling. The motor only has to be half an inch further back from the optimum to stop it from being ridden fast. Losing the front is the biggest risk. If it feels light in the front, you will not speed.
I have been blown to the weeds by experts, on less powerful bikes than my own. These days in Australia, we do not have graded races with capacity classes. There are no A-graders to teach us a lesson. I think I am a very mediocre rider. I have seen what the really good guys can do. They were not much faster, but much smoother. The top levels were A grade, then International. The International riders were faster again. When Victor Sousanne returned to Australia in the mid-70s, he was the length of the main straight at Sandown ahead of all the A grade riders. He had been second in MotoGP 250.Your right Al. Low power bikes are faster.
I have been blown to the weeds by experts, on less powerful bikes than my own. These days in Australia, we do not have graded races with capacity classes. There are no A-graders to teach us a lesson. I think I am a very mediocre rider. I have seen what the really good guys can do. They were not much faster, but much smoother. The top levels were A grade, then International. The International riders were faster again. When Victor Sousanne returned to Australia in the mid-70s, he was the length of the main straight at Sandown ahead of all the A grade riders. He had been second in MotoGP 250.
Did you read from the beginning?What was the comparison which was intended ? Modern Rocket 3 v modern Commando ? How could those two be compared - on what basis ? It would depend on where they were ridden.