Lorenzo said:I am just going to powdercoat the frame of my 750 roadster year 1973 and I was wondering if the original finish of the frame was gloss or more satin.. any idea from those who may have the memory of the history?
Thank you for helping!
hobot said:Got to see an undisturbed very low mileage as under 1000 on a '73 750 brought into Baxter Cycle to get a road worthy check up, while up there for their rally a few yrs ago, frame finish wiped off to Black Patent Leather polish and all the Lucas wiring looked so orderly and neat and robust well thought out and executed. At some point Norton frames got stove enameled I'm told but don't know if that covered any Cdo frames. My factory Trixie gets gloss black rattle can touch ups, Peel something else sky blue or lavender clear coated.
DogT said:After only 500 miles on mine this summer, the liquid gloss on mine has turned to motorcycle gloss. Scratches, dullness in areas, but I still like the look of it. I mean you just can't keep everything in a state of high gloss unless you don't use it. I don't think it really matters as long as the metal is covered and no rust pits anywhere. It certainly looks better that when I started. I suppose I could polish out the areas, but I'm not interested in that. It looks like a motorcycle that's been on the road. Even the high gloss black is hard to see imperfections in it, especially on the tubes, if it were a door or hood, that would be a different thing.
Dave
69S
Hobot: as I can understand you are voting vote for the gloss finish, as the most original one..
No, my bike had 4000 miles on it when I got it and was in fairly rough shape for only 2 years old. I get the feeling someone had raced it from the dings on it, the timing cover had been welded, there were bumps in the frame. But it ran good.Lorenzo said:Dave: I know you had a brand new Norton Commando. Do you recall how the frame was at that time?