Which is correct? For my own edification.

If your post is not about a Norton Commando, post here.

Which is correct? For my own edification.

Postby Jimmy_P » Thu Aug 04, 2011 3:21 pm

I'm waiting on the title to come in, and I'm trying to figure out which is the correct VIN for the bike. On the motor it's laid out like: 0/116xxx/P but on the Frame it's a little different. It's like this:

20
1
1
6
x
x
x

I'm just trying to figure out what'll be on the title. Will it be 0/116xxx/P, 20116xxx, or 116xxx?

Thanks!
User avatar
Jimmy_P
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 10:47 am

Re: Which is correct? For my own edification.

Postby Rohan » Thu Aug 04, 2011 4:26 pm

The VIN on the frame is generally the VIN number.
So its 20/116xxx

But should about be the same as the motor number anyway.
Your motor number should be 20/ , since the 20 is the model type for Atlas
(and Commando 750).

The /P on the end of the engine number says it was made in Plumstead.
Rohan
 
Posts: 1139
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:30 pm

Re: Which is correct? For my own edification.

Postby Jimmy_P » Fri Aug 05, 2011 4:31 am

Gracias! I don't see the 2 on the motor, but I guess it could be there. Thanks again!
User avatar
Jimmy_P
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 10:47 am

Re: Which is correct? For my own edification.

Postby Nortoniggy » Fri Aug 05, 2011 6:24 am

Rohan wrote:
The /P on the end of the engine number says it was made in Plumstead.


The P is actually a year marker. P being 1959. It would have been made at Bracebridge Street, B'ham. They were there until 1963.

Ian..
---------------------------------------------------------------------
1972 Commando Combat
1955 ES2
1983 BMW R100
2001 Honda VFR800
1 Understanding Wife
----------------------------------------------------------------------
User avatar
Nortoniggy
 
Posts: 81
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 9:53 am
Location: Kidderminster, UK.

Re: Which is correct? For my own edification.

Postby Jimmy_P » Fri Aug 05, 2011 6:59 am

Nortoniggy wrote:
Rohan wrote:
The /P on the end of the engine number says it was made in Plumstead.


The P is actually a year marker. P being 1959. It would have been made at Bracebridge Street, B'ham. They were there until 1963.

Ian..


That's interesting. The bike is a 66 (at least it's been titled that way for the past 30 years), so if it was only made through 63, I've got an issue.
User avatar
Jimmy_P
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 10:47 am

Re: Which is correct? For my own edification.

Postby britbikemike » Fri Aug 05, 2011 7:27 am

Very interesting indeed. My number was 20117069. Same year and model as yours. I didn't notice the other number, or a letter after the engine number. I checked the pics and it does not seem that there is one.
Traction is kind of like bowel control. Once you think you are going to lose it, it's probably too late!
66 Norton Atlas
72 Norton Commando
72 AJS Stormer
69 BSA Thunderbolt
User avatar
britbikemike
 
Posts: 165
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 9:46 am
Location: Marion, NC (Asheville NC)

Re: Which is correct? For my own edification.

Postby L.A.B. » Fri Aug 05, 2011 7:33 am

Jimmy_P wrote:
Nortoniggy wrote:
Rohan wrote:
The /P on the end of the engine number says it was made in Plumstead.


The P is actually a year marker. P being 1959. It would have been made at Bracebridge Street, B'ham. They were there until 1963.

Ian..


That's interesting. The bike is a 66 (at least it's been titled that way for the past 30 years), so if it was only made through 63, I've got an issue.



/P at the end of the engine number indicates that the engine was assembled in Plumstead. If it was the P year marker for 1959 then it would be stamped adjacent to the model code on the frame, however as it is an Atlas (20 = Atlas) then it couldn't be 1959 anyway as the model wasn't available before late 1962.
User avatar
L.A.B.
Moderator
 
Posts: 6593
{ IMAGES }: 1
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 3:41 pm
Location: Norfolk, UK

Re: Which is correct? For my own edification.

Postby Jimmy_P » Fri Aug 05, 2011 7:48 am

Britbikemike, the P is only on the engine, I'm not sure if you were looking at the frame number or engine number.

L.A.B. - That makes sense to me. I know it's an atlas, although for quite some time people told my dad it was an "Atlas II". I've never found any reference to that.

So, the title for mine should read 20116xxx...After doing some searching, I found that the P could refer to 1959, but only if it's for the year code for models between 1946 and 1960, after that it goes to the manufacture city, Plumstead (as indicated). The 20/ says it's an atlas, and the serial number falls in the 1966 range 115870 - 119759 (just like your's Mike). Now I've got it. Good info, really. Thanks!
User avatar
Jimmy_P
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 10:47 am

Re: Which is correct? For my own edification.

Postby L.A.B. » Fri Aug 05, 2011 8:18 am

Jimmy_P wrote:I know it's an atlas, although for quite some time people told my dad it was an "Atlas II". I've never found any reference to that.


A number of changes were made from '66 serial number 116372 (double speed oil pump and high pressure rocker feed etc.) so perhaps they were considered to be Atlas MkII models?
After all, the Commando was originally going to be called the "Atlas MkIII" (apparently that is why the early Commando model code was "20M3" = Atlas Mark 3) so there should have been a "MkII" Atlas!
User avatar
L.A.B.
Moderator
 
Posts: 6593
{ IMAGES }: 1
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 3:41 pm
Location: Norfolk, UK

Re: Which is correct? For my own edification.

Postby britbikemike » Fri Aug 05, 2011 9:09 am

Image I don't see a P on it but it could be covered up still and I just missed it.
Traction is kind of like bowel control. Once you think you are going to lose it, it's probably too late!
66 Norton Atlas
72 Norton Commando
72 AJS Stormer
69 BSA Thunderbolt
User avatar
britbikemike
 
Posts: 165
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 9:46 am
Location: Marion, NC (Asheville NC)

Re: Which is correct? For my own edification.

Postby Jimmy_P » Fri Aug 05, 2011 9:23 am

That looks like mine, and I can't see the 2.
User avatar
Jimmy_P
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 10:47 am

Re: Which is correct? For my own edification.

Postby Nortoniggy » Fri Aug 05, 2011 9:41 am

L.A.B. wrote:
That's interesting. The bike is a 66 (at least it's been titled that way for the past 30 years), so if it was only made through 63, I've got an issue.


/P at the end of the engine number indicates that the engine was assembled in Plumstead. If it was the P year marker for 1959 then it would be stamped adjacent to the model code on the frame, however as it is an Atlas (20 = Atlas) then it couldn't be 1959 anyway as the model wasn't available before late 1962.


You're right of course. I should have twigged that there were not Atlas's that early. My brain has been elsewhere lately. I blame the heat, or maybe I banged my head when i got knocked off my Commando & didn't realise. Or it could just be senility.

Ian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
1972 Commando Combat
1955 ES2
1983 BMW R100
2001 Honda VFR800
1 Understanding Wife
----------------------------------------------------------------------
User avatar
Nortoniggy
 
Posts: 81
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 9:53 am
Location: Kidderminster, UK.

Re: Which is correct? For my own edification.

Postby frankdamp » Fri Aug 05, 2011 10:12 am

The acronym you're looking for Ian, is CRS (Can't Remember S**t).
Frank Damp
ex-Norton Villiers - Marston Road
Develpment & Competition Department
1967-68
frankdamp
 
Posts: 450
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 8:02 pm
Location: Anacortes, WA, USA

Re: Which is correct? For my own edification.

Postby Jimmy_P » Fri Aug 05, 2011 10:19 am

frankdamp wrote:The acronym you're looking for Ian, is CRS (Can't Remember S**t).


I've got that too!
User avatar
Jimmy_P
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 10:47 am

Re: Which is correct? For my own edification.

Postby Rohan » Fri Aug 05, 2011 2:51 pm

britbikemike wrote: I don't see a P on it but it could be covered up still and I just missed it.


The /P for made in Plumstead didn't last for ever - it was dropped after a while, the Dealers knew by then where it was made.

BTW, it was said it appeared because stuff made in Plumstead was different dimensions, the blueprints supposedly hadn't been updated in years, and the Plumstead machinists didn't know how they were supposed to be made (don't believe the blueprints, they need to be like this !).
Apparently heads wouldn't fit on cylinders, and cylinders wouldn't fit crankcases, etc...
Rohan
 
Posts: 1139
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:30 pm

Next

Return to Other Classic Motorcycles

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests