Trouble at Mill

This Forum is for Norton Commando Motorcycle related topics.

Re: Trouble at Mill

Postby Matt Spencer » Fri Feb 03, 2012 3:32 am

Image
NOW we know what IT LOOKS LIKE . :!:
The one rule to the exception , is theres the exeption to each rule .
User avatar
Matt Spencer
 
Posts: 1473
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 6:30 am
Location: Upright

Re: Trouble at Mill

Postby Richard Barks » Fri Feb 03, 2012 4:44 am

what the F.................... is that !!!!!!!!!1
Richard Barks
 
Posts: 107
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 7:08 am
Location: nottingham england

Re: Trouble at Mill

Postby motorson » Fri Feb 03, 2012 5:59 am

The frame by itself looks like a P11.
User avatar
motorson
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 5:56 am
Location: Waxhaw, NC

Re: Trouble at Mill

Postby Hegel » Fri Feb 03, 2012 9:52 am

Got to admit, I'm more than a little intrigued also. Any more details Matt?
Hegel
 
Posts: 160
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 5:21 am
Location: England

Re: Trouble at Mill

Postby bill » Fri Feb 03, 2012 9:58 am

I would guess it is a new 961 at the assembly line

Matt Spencer wrote:Image
NOW we know what IT LOOKS LIKE . :!:
Windy
72 combat
www.switchbackcreek.com
bill
 
Posts: 823
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2003 4:49 pm
Location: Orlando Fl/Shady Valley Tn.

Re: Trouble at Mill

Postby john robert bould » Fri Feb 03, 2012 10:16 am

Spoke to a friend who paid a deposite 17 months ago,He received a phone call before christmas saying His bike is now ready for the assembly line, bleedin heck 17 months :!: and is READY for the assembly line...worse to come Norton have asked him for more money, Goe's without saying he is not a happy chap :twisted: Looks like Bad news, he either stumps up more cash or the bike gets put on hold,,,,Thats a real bastards trick :!: :!:
john robert bould
 
Posts: 867
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 12:18 pm

Re: Trouble at Mill

Postby L.A.B. » Fri Feb 03, 2012 10:35 am

john robert bould wrote:Spoke to a friend who paid a deposite 17 months ago,He received a phone call before christmas saying His bike is now ready for the assembly line, bleedin heck 17 months :!: and is READY for the assembly line...worse to come Norton have asked him for more money, Goe's without saying he is not a happy chap :twisted: Looks like Bad news, he either stumps up more cash or the bike gets put on hold,,,,Thats a real bastards trick :!: :!:


Those terms are stated in the purchase agreement clearly enough on the order form. Didn't he know that?
User avatar
L.A.B.
Moderator
 
Posts: 6593
{ IMAGES }: 1
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 3:41 pm
Location: Norfolk, UK

Re: Trouble at Mill

Postby john robert bould » Fri Feb 03, 2012 11:02 am

Well he proberly read the terms, but it's that long ago he forgot!
john robert bould
 
Posts: 867
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 12:18 pm

Re: Trouble at Mill

Postby L.A.B. » Fri Feb 03, 2012 11:15 am

john robert bould wrote:Well he proberly read the terms, but it's that long ago he forgot!


I was waiting for that! :)
User avatar
L.A.B.
Moderator
 
Posts: 6593
{ IMAGES }: 1
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 3:41 pm
Location: Norfolk, UK

Re: Trouble at Mill

Postby jeffdavison » Fri Feb 03, 2012 11:16 am

Probably just a display piece as the fram is not yet painted and I really don't think the frame is painted after assembly. another tell is that there are no tires on the rims.

cool shot tho.

JD

bill wrote:I would guess it is a new 961 at the assembly line

Matt Spencer wrote:Image
NOW we know what IT LOOKS LIKE . :!:
Last edited by jeffdavison on Sat Feb 04, 2012 8:51 am, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
jeffdavison
 
Posts: 383
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 4:55 pm
Location: Suwanee, Georgia USA

Re: Trouble at Mill

Postby Matt Spencer » Fri Feb 03, 2012 6:19 pm

Hegel wrote:Got to admit, I'm more than a little intrigued also. Any more details Matt?


Said Some Motorshow , Norton stand . 2011 .

Image

Announced a year previously at the 1985 Geneva Motor Show, the eventual unveiling a year later and every one of the 50 production cars had been pre-sold to customers placing a £15,000 deposit for the £87,000 machine.( Thought it was 50 % Deposit .Anyway , they started this trend , Deposits funding production )

Image
The one rule to the exception , is theres the exeption to each rule .
User avatar
Matt Spencer
 
Posts: 1473
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 6:30 am
Location: Upright

Re: Trouble at Mill

Postby john robert bould » Sat Feb 04, 2012 7:09 am

jeffdavison wrote:Probably just a display piece as the fram is not yet painted and I really don't theink the frame is painted after assembly. another tell is that there are no tires on the rims.

cool shot tho.

JD

bill wrote:I would guess it is a new 961 at the assembly line

Matt Spencer wrote:Image
NOW we know what IT LOOKS LIKE . :!:


I hope it was a prota type!, That frame looks like it was made at a local engineering school :!: The sudden top tube/oil tank size change at the rear looks rubbish,and check out the rear loop tubes connection to the top tube, looks like a very rushed hap- hazard affair to me.
john robert bould
 
Posts: 867
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 12:18 pm

Re: Trouble at Mill

Postby mikegray660 » Sat Feb 04, 2012 7:44 am

[quote="j]
I hope it was a prota type!, That frame looks like it was made at a local engineering school :!: The sudden top tube/oil tank size change at the rear looks rubbish,and check out the rear loop tubes connection to the top tube, looks like a very rushed hap- hazard affair to me.[/quote]

hey compared to some of the home made jobs i've seen around here that thing looks fantastic ! :shock:
73 850 Commando
75 750gt Ducati
78 Laverda 1200
96 900SS duck
61 BSA A10
62 Triumph T110
User avatar
mikegray660
 
Posts: 760
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 8:22 am
Location: Los Angeles, Ca

Re: Trouble at Mill

Postby john robert bould » Sat Feb 04, 2012 9:24 am

Mike, I am on about the top section, the front down tubes, swing arm area look OK, Its the oil tank and upper rear that [for me] looks poor. Ok it's all hid under the tank/seat. The oil tank is very much like a vincent UFM. Boxing in a big tube with sheet steel is very "Home" made to me. But i do like Ducati's :oops:
john robert bould
 
Posts: 867
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 12:18 pm

Re: Trouble at Mill

Postby grandpaul » Sun Feb 05, 2012 8:39 am

john robert bould wrote:Mike, I am on about the top section, the front down tubes, swing arm area look OK, Its the oil tank and upper rear that [for me] looks poor. Ok it's all hid under the tank/seat. The oil tank is very much like a vincent UFM. Boxing in a big tube with sheet steel is very "Home" made to me. But i do like Ducati's :oops:


I thought the new Norton lump was a horizontally split affair with a wet sump? i believe the top tube boxing is cosmetic and not functional as an oil reservoir.
GrandPaul
author "Old Bikes"
too many bikes to list, including a MkIII Interstate & Dunstallized Combat
User avatar
grandpaul
 
Posts: 5292
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:11 pm
Location: Laredo (south) Texas

PreviousNext

Return to Norton Commando Motorcycles.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest