http://www.panther-publishing.com/defau ... ntentID=35




grandpaul wrote:The stock setup is pretty effective, it just vents behind the rear fender.
The Triumph crowd don't use one-way breathers, it's not an issue in the same way a Norton is.

swooshdave wrote:grandpaul wrote:The stock setup is pretty effective, it just vents behind the rear fender.
The Triumph crowd don't use one-way breathers, it's not an issue in the same way a Norton is.
Anyone know why?

acadian wrote:swooshdave wrote:grandpaul wrote:The stock setup is pretty effective, it just vents behind the rear fender.
The Triumph crowd don't use one-way breathers, it's not an issue in the same way a Norton is.
Anyone know why?
According to one of the TUC guys, the shared crank/primary breather set up allows the chaincase to act as a plenum for the expelled crank pressure. I believe, and judging by the common rocker leaks found on triumphs, they seem to have more issues with top end breathing.


grandpaul wrote:To run a dry belt in a later model (Meriden) Triumph, all you have to do is install a left main seal and epoxy in the level transfer holes drilled in the crankcase.


sidreilley wrote:A few months ago as an experiment, I removed the plug from the timing tool hole (on the case behind the cylinders) while my 67 Bonneville was idling. Blipping the throttle off idle, it was obvious how much freer the engine wanted to rev when it was able to breathe and relieve the crankcase pressure (and this bike still has the stock timed disc on the camshaft). Try it sometime. When I get around to having an adapter made allowing me to attach a breather hose to this hole, I plan to attach an XS 650 valve and then vent out the back.
This might be worth considering for your street-tracker Dave. After you eliminate the venting into the primary case in order to run a belt, you'll need to vent the crankcase pressure somewhere.


Return to Other Classic Motorcycles
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests