Carbonfibre wrote:According to posts on here the Commando is far superior to bikes like the Z1 in pretty much every way. This being the case then surely the Norton would have been very successful in endurance racing, where even bikes seemingly as unsuitable as single cylinder Bultaco's won major races?
Running 24 hours at the Bol or Le-Mans without fault was something the big Kawasakis excelled at, and the fact that no Brit bike was able to do this with any degree of success was a measure of the reliability (or lack of same) of machinery whose original design in some cases dated back to the 1930's (Triumph twin 1937).
you do know this is a site for Norton enthusiasts don't you? the site name is a little hint to this.
I'm sure there are sites for Kawasaki enthusiasts that would love you to sign up and tell them how superior their motorcycles are, but I, for one, am tired of reading you ramble about pretty much everything you ramble about.
I doubt anyone here believes that the Norton Motorcycle is superior to anything else, but I am pretty sure it is safe to say that we all own them because we want to own a Norton, not because it is the best at anything it does.
Please go away