Norton Commando
Jerrydoe.com  Forum Home  Norton Commando Forum  Photos  [FAQ]  [Search]  [Memberlist]   
 [Profile]  [Check your private messages]  [Register]  [Log in] 
Iso upgrades

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Norton Commando Forum Index -> Norton Commando Motorcycles.
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
debby



Joined: 15 Apr 2004
Posts: 898
Location: Boulder, CO

PostPosted: Fri Nov 19, 2004 10:48 am    Post subject: Iso upgrades Reply with quote

I'm thinking about upgrading my bike to vernier isos. Mick Hemmings makes a kit for the isos that doesn't require replacing all the guts. I'm also really interested in that new Taylor headsteady that Clubman Racing is selling.

Comments/opinions? Am particularly interested in hearing from anyone who's using either of these.

Debby
Back to top
dynodave



Joined: 28 May 2003
Posts: 139
Location: USA

PostPosted: Fri Nov 19, 2004 11:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Arrow

Last edited by dynodave on Mon Apr 11, 2005 4:45 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
debby



Joined: 15 Apr 2004
Posts: 898
Location: Boulder, CO

PostPosted: Sun Nov 21, 2004 4:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So how does this sound for iso clearances: .010" rear, .035" front?? Shocked
Earlier this year when I replaced the worn-out swingarm spindle it tightened the handling up considerably but the bike still felt like it had a hinge in the middle. I think I know why now.

I'm going to be pulling the front mount and having a good look at all the pieces. I guess if I want to go ahead with those verniers now's the time.

BTW that rear gaiter was really a bear to peel back. I ended up removing the oil tank (had to anyway to trace an oil leak) and then cuttting part way thru the gaiter. I thought I could wrap it with some electrical tape to hold it together. I know it's a hack but what can you do. Was wondering how do you experts deal with that thing?

As for the headsteady, would upgrading to the 850 box-section unit make any noticeable improvement? Or should I just save up for an iso unit?

Debby
Back to top
dynodave



Joined: 28 May 2003
Posts: 139
Location: USA

PostPosted: Sun Nov 21, 2004 5:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Arrow

Last edited by dynodave on Mon Apr 11, 2005 4:46 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
bill



Joined: 01 Jun 2003
Posts: 135
Location: Orlando Fl/Shady Valley Tn.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 3:46 am    Post subject: ISO'S Reply with quote

debby
I have made a rod end headstedy for the chopper that I am building and also one for the frount mount.just think NO MORE SHIMMING! I am thinking about making a few for sale as a bolt on kit. me and dave talked about the rod end setup before but I think it will last ok as there are a lot of harleys and buels out there with rod end setups on them. if you would like pics I can email them to you but they are a little diffrent than for a stock bike.

bill
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 6:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Debby / Dynodave,

I seem to have the opposite problem with my Iso boots. Instead of the rubber becoming hard and stiff, it perishes and virtually crumbles apart when you attempt to peel it back for inpsection. Any thoughts on this?

I too am concerned about the Taylor head-steady for use on Commandos. My Electraglide has a tie-rod style head-steady and it's performed well for 37,000 miles. However, the the Harley frame and engine mounting system are designed around this tie-rod set up.

The rubber Norton head-steady may absorb more vibration than the tie-rod style? Will the tie-rod head-steady cause fatigue damage to the frame over time?

Regards,

Jason
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Norton Commando Forum Index -> Norton Commando Motorcycles. All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

The Unapproachable Norton Commando

At the end of 1967 the Norton Commando was announced.

The Norton Commando was greeted with a certain amount of scepticism because on first sight the commando appeared to comprise of the old Norton Dominator twin cylinder engine mounted at an inclined angle in a set of new cylinder parts.

It was not realized that the new Norton Commando Isolastic method of engine suspension damped out all engine vibration and produced a machine which had uncanny smoothness for a vertical twin. In due course the critics were silenced and the Norton Commando had the distinction of being regarded as the first of todays so called superbikes. There can be little doubt that the original design concept of the Norton Commando has proved correct, since comparatively few modifications of any real consequence have been made since production commenced during 1968.

Now nearly 40 years later Norton Commando riders like us are a breed of our own, and as far as we are concerned its still more fun to go for a blat on the old Norton Commando, and fast. As a Norton Commando owner and enthusiast, my goal here is to promote and give credit to those who keep the Norton name going.

It is more deserving to give credit to the Commando itself, for after all these years it continues to be respected. The original Commando designers like John Favill are those who deserve the credit for developing this incredible motorcycle.

The Norton Commando Roadster and Interstate of the late seventies, never died. Although the Norton Villiers factory dispersed the tradition lived on. Today Kenny Dreer in the USA is developing the new 952 CC Norton. What a great looking bike this is, and its engineering is still based on the original layout. It will be interesting to see how the new 952CC Norton does in todays tough motorcycle market. One thing is for sure, I would own one if I could afford it.