| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Colin_McKellar
Joined: 11 Aug 2008
Posts: 30
Location: Scotland
|
 Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 2:40 pm Post subject: Cam followers, how much wear is acceptable? |
 |
|
| I have stripped my 850 Mark 3 and the tips of the cam followers are scored but not too badly I think. The bottom of the pads feel very slightly rough and I was wondering what the best course of action would be. Do I replace them? A bit too expensive I think. So do I try and find somewhere in the UK to reface them or do they have to be really bad before any work has to be done on them? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
L.A.B.
Moderator
Joined: 20 Nov 2004
Posts: 1948
Location: Norfolk, UK
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 3:33 pm Post subject: Re: Cam followers, how much wear is acceptable? |
|
|
| Colin_McKellar wrote: | | So do I try and find somewhere in the UK to reface them or do they have to be really bad before any work has to be done on them? |
Difficult to say without seeing them, but Norton specialists such as Mick Hemmings, RGM Motors, Norvil etc. will regrind or reface the followers if they consider it to be necessary, for example, RGM will re-grind & polish them for £10 each: http://www.rgmmotors.co.uk/service.asp and Norvil will reface the set for £46 (+VAT): http://www.norvilmotorcycle.co.uk/workserv.htm
What condition are the camshaft lobes in? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jason Curtiss
Joined: 14 Jun 2003
Posts: 667
Location: HOUSTON, TEXAS
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 4:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| L.A.B. has a valid concern - check your cam lobes. The MK IIIs were notorious for having soft cams. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Colin_McKellar
Joined: 11 Aug 2008
Posts: 30
Location: Scotland
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 1:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
I actually thought that the lobes looked good. There were no obvious marks on them. My bike is from one of the last batches and was registered about May 1977 so maybe they had sorted out the soft cams by that time. I believe that the mileage on the bike to be around the 80K mark but a lot of the internals are perfect.
I bought the bike in 1981 and used it for a number of years before blowing the engine up by a stupid mistake caused by ignorance. I didn't change the crankshaft oil seal when I took the timing cover off for the first time since it left the factory and also didn't recognise that the clicking sound that I heard was not a loose tappet but the big ends giving way, ho hum! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Reggie
Joined: 24 Jul 2006
Posts: 185
Location: Yorkshire England
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 7:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
You could also try "Pete Lovell developments" directly. Pete has a lot of Norton expertise and is very nice to deal with. I know he used to do a lot of work on behalf of Norvil (and probably still does), and may be cheaper going to him directly, than through Norvil.
The RGM price looks attractive though.
l |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Colin_McKellar
Joined: 11 Aug 2008
Posts: 30
Location: Scotland
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 4:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
The lobes on the cams are fine. I forgot that I had changed the camshaft when i first split the cases years ago after the major blowup.
I live in Glasgow but there doesn't seem to be anywhere locally that would be able to give me an honest opinion as to whether the wear is within limits or work needs done on them. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Colin_McKellar
Joined: 11 Aug 2008
Posts: 30
Location: Scotland
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I phoned Peter Lovell but he was going to be the most expensive at £68 plus £7 postage |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fastback
Joined: 18 Jul 2004
Posts: 245
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Colin,
I love questions like this, as I am always wondering what exactly it means when it says "inspect and replace if necessary" Some guidelines/ tolerances would help!
I thought I'd post this photo as a reference. Is the wear shown acceptable?
You've got me wondering about those unidentified noises now....
Phil |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Colin_McKellar
Joined: 11 Aug 2008
Posts: 30
Location: Scotland
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Fastback, your cam followers look a lot worse than mine. I will try and photograph mine and that should give an indication of the wear. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Reggie
Joined: 24 Jul 2006
Posts: 185
Location: Yorkshire England
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 9:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Colin wrote;
| Quote: | | I phoned Peter Lovell but he was going to be the most expensive at £68 plus £7 postage |
Phew, that is a lot when, as I understand it, that he does most of Norvils engineering work, and they charge £46.00 plus VAT.
Last time I had work done, he suggested that if I had gone to him direct and not through Norvil, it would have been a bit cheaper.
Maybe he's busy  Sorry it was a dead duck. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
L.A.B.
Moderator
Joined: 20 Nov 2004
Posts: 1948
Location: Norfolk, UK
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 10:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Reggie wrote: | | Phew, that is a lot when, as I understand it, that he does most of Norvils engineering work, and they charge £46.00 plus VAT. |
Perhaps he didn't appreciate being phoned up on a bank holiday, and added a bit extra to the price! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
79x100
Joined: 19 May 2006
Posts: 706
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 11:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Refacing the followers is not a job that needs to be done by a Norton specialist. Any competent engineering shop should be able to put them on the surface grinder. It is of course important that they are ground at 90° to the vertical faces.
One point to bear in mind depending on when you did your cam job is that the original sand-cast followers had a tendency to lose the stellite pad. Later (perhaps the last 20 years or so ?) Andover followers are lost-wax cast and have a spigotted stellite pad. Personally, I wouldn't put an early set back. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Colin_McKellar
Joined: 11 Aug 2008
Posts: 30
Location: Scotland
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 2:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I thought that the followers looked OK but after making a big mistake (again) of giving the barrels to a company to be bead blasted but not taking the followers out the barrels came back with the followers jammed in with grit!! I soaked them in oil but ended up having to tap them out with a hammer as they were so badly wedged in. The company was told to cover the followers but that consisted of the blaster putting his hand over the tunnel, allegedly!
It was only after cleaning the followers that I noticed the damage. I have managed to photograph the followers but when you run a finger over them there is almost no difference or roughness. I still think that the followers got blasted rather than wear and tear.
If someone tells me how to load a photo then I will post the one I took today.
[img][/img] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
L.A.B.
Moderator
Joined: 20 Nov 2004
Posts: 1948
Location: Norfolk, UK
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Colin_McKellar
Joined: 11 Aug 2008
Posts: 30
Location: Scotland
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Norton Commando Forum by Corporate Pages Web hosting using phpbb
The Unapproachable Norton Commando
At the end of 1967 the Norton Commando was announced.
The Norton Commando was greeted with a certain amount of scepticism because on first sight the commando appeared to comprise of the old Norton Dominator twin cylinder engine mounted at an inclined angle in a set of new cylinder parts.
It was not realized that the new Norton Commando Isolastic method of engine suspension damped out all engine vibration and produced a machine which had uncanny smoothness for a vertical twin. In due course the critics were silenced and the Norton Commando had the distinction of being regarded as the first of todays so called superbikes. There can be little doubt that the original design concept of the Norton Commando has proved correct, since comparatively few modifications of any real consequence have been made since production commenced during 1968.
Now nearly 40 years later Norton Commando riders like us are a breed of our own, and as far as we are concerned its still more fun to go for a blat on the old Norton Commando, and fast. As a Norton Commando owner and enthusiast, my goal here is to promote and give credit to those who keep the Norton name going.
It is more deserving to give credit to the Commando itself, for after all these years it continues to be respected. The original Commando designers like John Favill are those who deserve the credit for developing this incredible motorcycle.
The Norton Commando Roadster and Interstate of the late seventies, never died. Although the Norton Villiers factory dispersed the tradition lived on. Today Kenny Dreer in the USA is developing the new 952 CC Norton. What a great looking bike this is, and its engineering is still based on the original layout. It will be interesting to see how the new 952CC Norton does in todays tough motorcycle market. One thing is for sure, I would own one if I could afford it.
