Norton Commando
Jerrydoe.com  Forum Home  Norton Commando Forum  Photos  [FAQ]  [Search]  [Memberlist]   
 [Profile]  [Check your private messages]  [Register]  [Log in] 
Still won't run...
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Norton Commando Forum Index -> Norton Commando Motorcycles.
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
debby



Joined: 15 Apr 2004
Posts: 898
Location: Boulder, CO

PostPosted: Fri Aug 13, 2004 9:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I plugged the holes with old air screws, cut down to remove all the threaded portion. I used some nice tight-fitting orings from the local NAPA car parts place. I wouldn't think they'd be plugging the passageway because that's much deeper, down at the end of what would be the threaded area.

It does seem like a fuel related issue. If it's an electrical problem why would the bike restart so easily when I flood the carbs? It's very strange.

Debby
Back to top
Jason Curtiss



Joined: 14 Jun 2003
Posts: 667
Location: HOUSTON, TEXAS

PostPosted: Fri Aug 13, 2004 9:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Deb,

What does PM (private mail) mean?

Yes, I too believe it's still a fuel problem. It's as if the enigne is stalling because it has run out of fuel. That's why I thought the vent in the gas cap may have been plugged. And it's also why I suggested to check the fuel level in the carburetors imediately after the bike stalls. I was positive you would find near-dry bowls, but you proved these two hypothesis' wrong.

Also, I thought momentarily that you had a too-rich condition and once the bike was warm it would stall from excess fuel. But this logic is counter to your restarting process of tickling the carburetors.

Your riding season is about gone, I would suppose. So, perhaps you can hunker down during those long cold winter months and get to really know your Norton; it helps to have a pal around for consultation, how about Sooty?

Regards,

Jason
Back to top
debby



Joined: 15 Apr 2004
Posts: 898
Location: Boulder, CO

PostPosted: Fri Aug 13, 2004 9:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jason,

PM = private message. You can send one by clicking on the PM button at the bottom of my post.

Our riding season probably has a couple of months left. This summer has been much cooler and wetter than the past few years so who knows? We might be getting snow in September this year. The snow generally doesn't last long though, so you can ride year round if you choose the right days. I doubt if I'll get the Norton running reliably this season though. Guess I'll have to go back to riding my Ducati Smile

Sooty is a cutie! Maybe he could help me work on the bike. I'm moving next weekend so I have to wait until that's done but I thought I'd go have a visit with him if he's still available. Persians are such sweet, loving little creatures.

Debby
Back to top
norbsa48503



Joined: 07 Apr 2004
Posts: 1035
Location: Flint, Michigan

PostPosted: Fri Aug 13, 2004 6:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debby, Start at the floats everything else will go easy. This is off Old Brits: Several articles have been published about setting the float level on Concentric Carburetors and this is a summary of the important points from people in the know:

The actual specification, from the engineer who designed the Concentric Barry Johnston, gives a gas level of between .170" to .240" below the top edge of the float bow, 170” being rich and .240" being lean. This level has a dramatic effect on the running of a properly tuned motorcycle. It pays testaments to the design of this carburetor that the range of miss-adjustment it can tolerate and still have the motorcycle run, if only poorly. It is suggested that you set the float level first before doing any carb adjustment.

The level can be estimated by placing the round edge of the plastic float between .060" and .090" below the edge of the bowl when the needle is depressed by a slight force on one of the float's needle tangs. You can turn the bowl upside down to establish this. With the float above the top of the bowl, as described in the Norton Tech manual, the float can contact the bottom of the body and not allow the float needle to seat firmly. It also makes the carb rich through the jetting range. With the float, level with the top of the bowl, although not as rich as when it is above the top, it is still out of the specified range.
The Norton News says set them 3/32 above the float bowl edge while holding them upside down. The only way to realy know for sure is to build a service tool that replaces the drain plugs and allows you to run plastic tubes to atmosphere to check where they are durring a run. Dyno Dave on this site has a set of these and they takes away all the mysteries. Allen Goldwater has wrote an article on Amal jet sets for all years I can help you find that but I think you have float problems. No sence in adjusting anything till this is just right. norbsa
Back to top
nortonfan



Joined: 24 Dec 2003
Posts: 362
Location: Brisbane, Australia

PostPosted: Fri Aug 13, 2004 7:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wow, I reckon I will have to get a degree in engineering to continue working on my Nortons after reading that last chapter.
Back to top
debby



Joined: 15 Apr 2004
Posts: 898
Location: Boulder, CO

PostPosted: Sat Aug 14, 2004 5:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I need to win the lottery and retire from my job to keep working on my Norton!!!

The plastic tube to check the float level sounds like a really good idea. Unfortunately my float bowls don't have drain plugs. So I took one bowl off, hooked up the fuel line and watched it fill up while I held it in my hand. Couldn't run the engine like that but I think that's a more accurate measurement of the float level than dry measurements. The top of the float was a little below the top of the bowl. I didn't measure it but it looked in the ballpark as they say. I've previously measured them both dry (lot of conflicting info about that!) and they're both the same.

The other thing about this problem is it had a sudden onset. It did not develop gradually. The last time the bike ran normally was the 4th of July weekend. All was well then. The bike then sat for two weeks before I had time to ride it again. That's when this problem presented. Something happened during that two week period that broke the bike. But what could it be??? I don't think the floats suddenly changed their position, nor do I think the float bowl gaskets suddenly moved over and grabbed the float. So I'm skeptical about float settings being the cause, even though the symptoms otherwise seem to indicate it. Besides, if the float level is too rich how would that make the bike starve for fuel? Although I'm not sure it really *is* starving for fuel because when I pull the float bowls they're full of fuel not empty.

So it remains the unsolvable problem....

Debby
71 750 Roadster parts bike
Back to top
nortonfan



Joined: 24 Dec 2003
Posts: 362
Location: Brisbane, Australia

PostPosted: Sat Aug 14, 2004 11:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Winning the lottery sounds like a good thing !! If you do fly me over for a visit & to fix your Norton maybe.

Ok then, if it isn't fuel... have u checked any spade connections u may have on your coils. These can be contacting for a while & then not contacting when the bike is running/vibrating if they slip off.
You get what I mean........this may be happening somewhere along the electrical side.

No matter how simple this problem ends up being, pls let us know what the problem was when u find it.
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well guess what - I got it running!!! I can't really say what the problem was. A combination of things I guess. Those carbs were in pretty sad shape when I got the bike. It originally had the nylon float needles, the floats were gummed up with gasket sealer, the slides were sticking, the needle jets were worn out, the jetting was wrong for this altitude, and the pilot jets were clogged. There wasn't much of anything *right* about them.

I worked through most of those issues over the last four months but the pilots were always a problem and trying to compensate with the airscrews just did not work. I fouled out at least a dozen plugs. So I finally cleaned the pilot circuits but as you know it still wasn't running.

Today I noticed it seemed too rich below 2000 rpm. Sort of felt like it was loading up right before stalling out. So leaned out the air screws some more. They're at two turns out now which is probably about right for this altitude. It was still stalling out though, so on a whim I installed another set of new plugs. That got it running! I did some test rides around the block and he was running well! That's the first time since July 3. The old plugs didn't look fouled, just black and sooty but they sure didn't work.

Now I should probably take the time to get the float height exactly right. I think they're a bit too high (rich) right now. And I'll have to spend some more time adjusting the idle. And I think whenever I ride the bike I'll be carrying a new set of plugs and a plug wrench! It will take me a while to get my confidence back with the bike. But this is very encouraging.

Lesson learned? I guess I'd say everything has to be set up just right. You have to be fanatical about the details. Anyway, wish me luck. Hopefully it will be ok for a while now. May still need new carbies before long though...

Debby
71 750 Roadster, running! Very Happy
Back to top
debby



Joined: 15 Apr 2004
Posts: 898
Location: Boulder, CO

PostPosted: Sat Aug 14, 2004 3:01 pm    Post subject: end of the rainbow Reply with quote

Sure Reg, if I win the jackpot the airline ticket will be on it's way! Or maybe I'll come down. I've never been down there, would like to visit someday.

Electrical connections were part of the problem. The spade lugs on the ignition switch had pretty bad corrosion and the junction blocks under the tank were actually broken. The wires were just sitting in there loose, including the wires from the kill button. The bike had been poorly maintained for years and now it has to be made right. That's proving to be a much bigger job than I anticipated but I am making progress.

Debby

ps - front brake still doesn't work. maybe a careful adjustment of the linkage would help...
Back to top
norbsa48503



Joined: 07 Apr 2004
Posts: 1035
Location: Flint, Michigan

PostPosted: Sun Aug 15, 2004 7:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Debby, Always good to tune a running bike instead of reviiving a dead one. Try some Auto Lite AP64's plugs that's what I run in both my Nortons they don't gas foul. Just went through my front drum brake and got some learning taken care of. First there are a lot of parts to this job that need a helper so charm some one soon. My brake worked well but the old shoes would glaze over causing fade right after hard use. So time for fresh Ferodo shoes. These need to be turned but no need for a lathe or hundeds of dollars. This is what I did it works well. Clean the drum with sand paper on the inside with 60 grit this knocks down the glaze and prepares the surface for rubber cement. Cut some strips of 60 grit the width of the drum, you will need three paint up the back of the strips with rubber cement as well as the inside of the drum. The paper needs two coats, let it dry and line the inside of the drum no gaps with 60 grit. now assemble your new shoes on the backing plate just like you were going to run it this way. You will need to back off all your adjusters but go ahead and hook up the cable. Ok now for the helper bikes on the center stand and the stands on a piece of 2x wood helper is on the bike keeping the bike on the rear wheel and gently applying the front brake you are on your side on the ground turning the front tire buy hand when your helper tells you the handle has touched the handle bar it's time to pull it apart for a check. When you get 90% touching your done with the sanding. You now need to sand a half inch of taper on the leading side of each shoe don't skip this step or it won't quit stopping. Now after you have got this done and every thing is clean and relubed don't forget to put a little grease on the shoes were they contact the cams, It's time to adjust the two shoes. Again you need a helper to get this right. The first shoe is the one that the cable pulls directly on and the second shoe is the one that is pulled on by the adjustible rod. You need to start by backing off the second shoe so there is no contact when the brake is on. Now hold the brake on with your hand and have your helper slowly adjust the second shoe till you feel the lever move just a little in your hand. This is critical and may take a few trys to get right. Each time having your helper back off the adjuster just a little while you take rests from holding the brake on by hand. Make sure that it's as close as you can get it re adjust and tighten everything, time for a brake in also critical. This is first gear work take the bike up to shift point and use the brake easy at first than harder and harder each time till your skidding to a stop. You are heating the brake up to very hot on this first run. Now let it cool down all the way and re adjust everything. I took mine apart at this stage just to clean out the dust and recheck the lube and such. With all the cleaning and fussing plan on four hours work and an hour of cool off time than another hour of cleaning and readjustment. The only time this system shows it's weekness is when your riding with bikes that have two front disk brakes and they are using them hard in their riding style. My brake will lock the front wheel at anything shy of 65 MPH if I really grab a handfull. I have left out some details on grease types and tighting sequinces to keep this shorter but you get the idea. If you need more info PM me.norbsa
Back to top
tony Targett



Joined: 18 Jul 2003
Posts: 25
Location: Sydney Australia

PostPosted: Sun Aug 15, 2004 10:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Debby,

I have been watching this thread with interest. My 850 has been idle for about 6 weeks (travel & family commitments) and has proven difficult to get started. Everytime I try I end up with wet plugs and a sweat.

All the advise you have been getting has given me a few pointers.

It seems that my Champion N7YC plugs are lasting less than 200miles..I changed to NKG B7ES and if Ican get Iridiums I'll give them a go.

It started after about 5 kicks...

Carbys next.
Back to top
nortonfan



Joined: 24 Dec 2003
Posts: 362
Location: Brisbane, Australia

PostPosted: Thu Aug 19, 2004 1:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Congratulations on getting it running.

Now you need to make it a reliable runner.

Your quote earlier
"
Electrical connections were part of the problem. The spade lugs on the ignition switch had pretty bad corrosion and the junction blocks under the tank were actually broken. The wires were just sitting in there loose, including the wires from the kill button.
"
This looks like more of a problem than measuring float levels for your road bike, how far out do they have to be to stop it running ???

All this talk about putting single mikunis on & stuff is simply not required.

One bloke I ride with (a harley mechanic), but loves nortons, uses a single amal carby & he is quickest off the mark. His bike idles & is reliable.

A rewire or new harness & connectors might be a good step in the right direction.

I am sure you are enjoying the next riding chapter in the nortons life.

Has the norton got a reprieve ? Are you keeping it for now ? Very Happy
Back to top
nortonfan



Joined: 24 Dec 2003
Posts: 362
Location: Brisbane, Australia

PostPosted: Thu Aug 19, 2004 2:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Debby,
The reason I put this quote in
"
One bloke I ride with (a harley mechanic), but loves nortons, uses a single amal carby & he is quickest off the mark. His bike idles & is reliable.
"
Well I thought you may find it easier to "tune" your norton.
Dual/2 carbys need to be pretty well synchronised.........
Frankly they can be a pain in the proverbial.
But a single amal keeps the "norton aunthenticity" & is simple to set/tune.

When one wears out swap em over, the only difference will be the tickler.

Any one with a norton will testify to the maintenance required to keep them in "top tune" & a single amal will only cost you a manifold.
Back to top
debby



Joined: 15 Apr 2004
Posts: 898
Location: Boulder, CO

PostPosted: Thu Aug 19, 2004 3:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

For now the electrics are ok. I "reassigned" some good terminal blocks from the turn signals and switch cluster. At the moment I don't have power to the high beam flasher or the turn signals but that's ok. The bike doesn't have turn sigs fitted and I can live without the beam flasher. I bought some new terminal blocks from Old Britts but they don't seem to fit. So I need to figure out what's up with that...

The bike does have a newer wiring harness and the ignition switch appears ok. And, as Jason likes to hear, it has a nice fat blue spark. So that's good!
I rode it Monday after work and it started *first kick* and ran great Very Happy

You know, regarding carbys there's been a whole bunch of glowing testimonials on the INOA list recently about single Mikunis. They make a compelling case. Maybe I should consider that when these amals are finally shot. Some of the benefits:

carb body doesn't warp
slides don't wear out
needle jets don't wear out (until you have really high miles)
float bowl gasket doesn't foul the float.
adjusting the float level is a simple matter of bending a metal tab
pilot jet easily removed for cleaning or replacement
pilot jets available in various sizes
jetting increments are finer, making it easier to get the right jetting (on the amals I've noticed all available settings seem too rich or too lean)
don't have to deal with the miserable stock airbox - what a pain!

Maybe I could spend more time riding and less time messing with the carbs! All those bennies and the only cost is a slight loss on the top end. And I'm told I shouldn't rev it up to redline anyway or the engine might blow (not sure if that's really true but don't wanna find out!) Hmm...

Debby
Back to top
nortonfan



Joined: 24 Dec 2003
Posts: 362
Location: Brisbane, Australia

PostPosted: Thu Aug 19, 2004 4:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sounds like you have it sorted for now then...........

If I can make one more comment about amals.

A lot of people pull the "choke" slides out as they don't use it.

Some of us believe that leaving it in will stop the slides wearing out as quickly. The reason being it stops the slides rattling around as much.

I ain't no engineer, so what does anyone else think of this conclusion ?
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Norton Commando Forum Index -> Norton Commando Motorcycles. All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

The Unapproachable Norton Commando

At the end of 1967 the Norton Commando was announced.

The Norton Commando was greeted with a certain amount of scepticism because on first sight the commando appeared to comprise of the old Norton Dominator twin cylinder engine mounted at an inclined angle in a set of new cylinder parts.

It was not realized that the new Norton Commando Isolastic method of engine suspension damped out all engine vibration and produced a machine which had uncanny smoothness for a vertical twin. In due course the critics were silenced and the Norton Commando had the distinction of being regarded as the first of todays so called superbikes. There can be little doubt that the original design concept of the Norton Commando has proved correct, since comparatively few modifications of any real consequence have been made since production commenced during 1968.

Now nearly 40 years later Norton Commando riders like us are a breed of our own, and as far as we are concerned its still more fun to go for a blat on the old Norton Commando, and fast. As a Norton Commando owner and enthusiast, my goal here is to promote and give credit to those who keep the Norton name going.

It is more deserving to give credit to the Commando itself, for after all these years it continues to be respected. The original Commando designers like John Favill are those who deserve the credit for developing this incredible motorcycle.

The Norton Commando Roadster and Interstate of the late seventies, never died. Although the Norton Villiers factory dispersed the tradition lived on. Today Kenny Dreer in the USA is developing the new 952 CC Norton. What a great looking bike this is, and its engineering is still based on the original layout. It will be interesting to see how the new 952CC Norton does in todays tough motorcycle market. One thing is for sure, I would own one if I could afford it.