Norton Commando
Jerrydoe.com  Forum Home  Norton Commando Forum  Photos  [FAQ]  [Search]  [Memberlist]   
 [Profile]  [Check your private messages]  [Register]  [Log in] 
Norton 880 long-term project
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Norton Commando Forum Index -> Norton Commando Motorcycles.
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
grandpaul



Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 533
Location: Laredo (south) Texas

PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:10 am    Post subject: Norton 880 long-term project Reply with quote

Okay, this begins my first bare-bones start to finish long-term race bike project - a Commando with Kenny Dreer jugs & pistons,
and a set of modified 850 cases.

So far, I've received the jugs & pistons, cases are on the way-





I've got a brand new belt drive kit sitting on the shelf, and I'm considering having a welded up 90 degree crank versus a billet crank,
then the top end using a properly ported RH10 with flat slide carbs and a trick exhaust.

This project is likely to take a couple of years, so don't hold your breath for progress photos as quick as they typically
appear on client's bikes...
Back to top
frankdamp



Joined: 07 Oct 2005
Posts: 143
Location: Anacortes, WA, USA

PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 6:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good luck with this one. It may tax your Norton knowledge to the max. I'm sure an 880 would have mind-blowing performance.

For me the original 750 Commando prototypes were hairy enough, but that was with previous experience of a 150 Vespa, an Ariel Leader 250 and an elderly BSA A7.

Out of the frying pan into the fire!
Back to top
worntorn



Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 168
Location: Langley, B.C.

PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What are the advantages of the Dreer 880 over the RGM 920 kit?


The RGM pistons are forged pistons, (probably Cosworth) compression ratio can be set as desired up to about 10.5 to one. I plan to find an 850 basket case bike to use the 920 kit on.
The 920 uses sleeves which are pressed into the bored out 850 barrels.
Back to top
grandpaul



Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 533
Location: Laredo (south) Texas

PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 6:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't know that there are any advantages, I didn't do any research, I just wanted to try something different and I knew Kenny had some leftover stuff. He gave me a deal that beat the poop out of anything I could have done as far as RGM parts, for sure!
Back to top
grandpaul



Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 533
Location: Laredo (south) Texas

PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 3:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Talked to Kenny at length and decided to take a VR880 head he had returned for a minor oil leak. He's going to sleeve the stud hole and ship it with professionally ported and polished 33mm intakes and matched exhausts, 17mm intake valves with titanium collets, and all polished up to go.

Kenny uses Megacycle 560-00 cams, I have yet to price one; also I'm sure the billet crank will be a spendy bit. Other than those two items, there's not much left to consider, engine-wise.

So, this is beginning to sound a lot more like a "VR" than a "BAB", the biggest difference will be in the builder and not so much the parts. I might just have to hunt down somebody with an 880 and have a go to see how well I did.
Back to top
worntorn



Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 168
Location: Langley, B.C.

PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 8:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is the VR880 head a totally different design or is it a reshaped Commando Head ti fit the larger bore?
BTW, the RGM 920 conversion kit is pretty cheap, just $320 but you must add to that the cost of boring out the cylinders then fitting the spun cast liners, which is about $200. And you must have some 850 cylinders to start with.
Back to top
grandpaul



Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 533
Location: Laredo (south) Texas

PostPosted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 7:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The VR880 head is basically either an RH4 or an RH10 that is ported and flowed, with intake ports sized to match whatever iteration they were on at the time. The head I'm getting is 33mm for the FCRs on custom machined intakes. Not that I have FCRs, but I'll work out something that will be properly matched.

The deal I got on the jugs & slugs was very similar, still cheaper.
Back to top
grandpaul



Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 533
Location: Laredo (south) Texas

PostPosted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 11:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Case halves arrived today. The stock Right half will need to be machined to match the mods that were done on the Left half,
but there's not a lot besides upsizing the main top end stud hole threads.

I'm going to fight the urge to use the Superblend bearing that's in the Right side, unless Kenny verifies that it's good.
There's also a nify upgraded roller style cam bearing instead of a plain bushing.





Back to top
grandpaul



Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 533
Location: Laredo (south) Texas

PostPosted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 2:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I went to have a look at a set of modern forks with dual front discs and it turns out it's a complete rolling chassis;
so I thought "what the heck" and rounded up enough bits to check feasibility:

Not too bad of a fit...


A little too snug to get to the exhaust valve adjusters...


the pipes would clear with the head here, but the engine has to move higher and further back for the head to line up with the jugs...


The rear isolastic would be an easy fit to the existing mounts, but there are no front mounts...


Too many issues with this chassis, but i might still buy the forks and re-paint the wheel. I wonder if I could shoehorn the matching rear wheel
into Kenny's custom swingarm? hmmm....
Back to top
grandpaul



Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 533
Location: Laredo (south) Texas

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just traded e-mails with Kenny and it looks like he's got the monoshock rear end and the blue bodywork that were on the original prototype 952, he say's he'll sell them to me as soon as he reverse-engineers the monoshock setup as he no longer has the drawings and patterns.

I went ahead and bought that rolling Kawasaki 636 chassis and found out I can slip that front end right onto my stock '74 Norton frame with a set of custom bearings and a bit of machining on the yoke stem. Piece o' cake! (I'll sell the frame arnd rear end on e-bay to help finance the Dreer parts)

This sucker is shaping up to be one heck of a special!
Back to top
grandpaul



Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 533
Location: Laredo (south) Texas

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

By the way, here's my goal; this latest news gets me a LOT closer!

Back to top
bill



Joined: 01 Jun 2003
Posts: 131
Location: Orlando Fl/Shady Valley Tn.

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gp I did an 880 motor last winter for a guy with a ported head and a 56-000 cam. a few notes, it CCed out at 10.25/1 with a base gasket and 10.5/1 without. the piston kit was from TC Christenson and was heavy so check what you have. The 56-000 cam is close to a combat as for timing events with more lift. My think is bigger bore =more lift so that came was a good choice and it does work VERY good. We also used 1 1/2 exhaust with peashooters. as of now it has a set of stock amals but looks like a set of 35 FCR's will happen this winter Very Happy. it is already a hoss but the carbs should really help it. I don't like the 920 kit as it takes a lot of integrity from the jug. the one's I have looked at you can see the sleeves where the boring bar breaks through the casting.


windy
Back to top
littlefield



Joined: 20 Jul 2008
Posts: 7
Location: Clute, TX

PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 4:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grandpaul,
Are you using the 636 top clamp? I'm fitting some R6 forks onto my 71 using the stock 25mm bore bearings. 30mm on the Yamaha. The top clamp normally locates on a 1inch + fit on the stem. The easiest way I can see to do it is use a 3/4 or 7/8 hardware store nut to load the bearings and then make a locknut with the right size and height to locate the top clamp. What did you have in mind? I'm thinking about using Convertibars. They're kind of clunky looking but the Yamaha top clamp looks too thin to attach bars on top.
Back to top
grandpaul



Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 533
Location: Laredo (south) Texas

PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 5:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I hadn't thought about the bars on the 952 being standard style, and the 636 being clip-ons.

I'll have to give it a think.
Back to top
grandpaul



Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 533
Location: Laredo (south) Texas

PostPosted: Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Back from a long race trip including the Bonneville Salt Flats, Miller Motorsports Park in salt Lake City, and the Sandia Classic at Albuquerque; fared quite well at all venues.

Meanwhile, I had a guy meet me at the track in Albuquerque and bring me an 850 Mark III es engine and rear wheel with all the brake parts & footpegs. I'll be able to use the primary cases, transmission, rear brake gear and rear hub on the project. Not so sure about the electric starter yet, have to check out the possibilities with the belt drive that I already have.

Talked to Kenny for nearly an hour about issues surrounding use of the monoshock rear end, rear tire & carburation possibilities, and various other stuff.

The head, bodywork & swingarm should be arriving soon!
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Norton Commando Forum Index -> Norton Commando Motorcycles. All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

The Unapproachable Norton Commando

At the end of 1967 the Norton Commando was announced.

The Norton Commando was greeted with a certain amount of scepticism because on first sight the commando appeared to comprise of the old Norton Dominator twin cylinder engine mounted at an inclined angle in a set of new cylinder parts.

It was not realized that the new Norton Commando Isolastic method of engine suspension damped out all engine vibration and produced a machine which had uncanny smoothness for a vertical twin. In due course the critics were silenced and the Norton Commando had the distinction of being regarded as the first of todays so called superbikes. There can be little doubt that the original design concept of the Norton Commando has proved correct, since comparatively few modifications of any real consequence have been made since production commenced during 1968.

Now nearly 40 years later Norton Commando riders like us are a breed of our own, and as far as we are concerned its still more fun to go for a blat on the old Norton Commando, and fast. As a Norton Commando owner and enthusiast, my goal here is to promote and give credit to those who keep the Norton name going.

It is more deserving to give credit to the Commando itself, for after all these years it continues to be respected. The original Commando designers like John Favill are those who deserve the credit for developing this incredible motorcycle.

The Norton Commando Roadster and Interstate of the late seventies, never died. Although the Norton Villiers factory dispersed the tradition lived on. Today Kenny Dreer in the USA is developing the new 952 CC Norton. What a great looking bike this is, and its engineering is still based on the original layout. It will be interesting to see how the new 952CC Norton does in todays tough motorcycle market. One thing is for sure, I would own one if I could afford it.