Norton Commando
Jerrydoe.com  Forum Home  Norton Commando Forum  Photos  [FAQ]  [Search]  [Memberlist]   
 [Profile]  [Check your private messages]  [Register]  [Log in] 
Swing arm

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Norton Commando Forum Index -> Norton Commando Motorcycles.
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Philippe
Guest





PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2004 2:34 pm    Post subject: Swing arm Reply with quote

As anyone tried to adapt a "foreign" swing arm on a MK2 (Ducati or even Alu/Jap)? Should be easier to help putting a disc on the back?
Philippe
Back to top
Ron L



Joined: 27 Feb 2004
Posts: 1147
Location: Ohio

PostPosted: Thu May 13, 2004 7:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why not just use a MkIII swing arm? This will mount easily with the MkII spindle. You can then use a MkIII rear wheel and disc. Be sure to use a MkIII speedo drive.

I put an entire MkIII cradle, swingarm and wheel in my '73 Interstate. It required slotting the upper transmission bolt hole for primary chain adjustment. This way I could use the better swingarm spindle retaining system and got the vernier isolastics as a bonus. A small master cylinder can be mounted above the fender on the frame and actuated by the cable from the left brake pedal. It's a pretty transparent swap. Most people look at the bike quite a while before they notice.

Would I do it again? Probably not. I had the pieces laying in the shop, including the speedo drive, axle, and wheel. If you have to buy all that, it can be pretty expensive. You don't gain much at the rear wheel as far as braking power. The front does most of the work anyway. You do get the strongest of the three versions of Commando swingarm. However, you still have a two-piece axle. Convenient for pulling the rear wheel, but weak when racing or adding horsepower.

Ron L
Back to top
norbsa48503



Joined: 07 Apr 2004
Posts: 1034
Location: Flint, Michigan

PostPosted: Thu May 13, 2004 8:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A few years ago at the Norton tent at Mid-Ohio a man had adapted a full mono shock set up off another brand and still retaned the transmision engine cradle. It was a real clean job, anything is posible most who modify the rear are after wt saving not braking. norbsa
Back to top
Dwardo
Guest





PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2004 9:50 am    Post subject: Swingarm Reply with quote

Hi, Ron. I did the same as you (and I probably wouldn't do it again either) but I used a modified MK3 master cylinder under the seat. I'm unhappy with this, so I want to know, what kind of master cylinder did you use and where did you get it? Got any pix?
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2004 6:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dwardo,
I used a Hurst-Airheart master cylinder from and old dirt tracker. These are small and easy to mount and I often see them available at swap meets. Seal kits are hard to find tho.
Ron L
Back to top
Ron L



Joined: 27 Feb 2004
Posts: 1147
Location: Ohio

PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2004 4:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dwardo,
Here's a pic of the master cylinder I used.
http://www.cometkartsales.com/store/brakes/images/airheartmc.jpg

Ron L
Back to top
Stuart SS



Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 270
Location: Australia's Far tropical nth

PostPosted: Tue Jun 01, 2004 3:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Some time back there was a controversy over the adapting of needle bearing/ conversion for the Norton swingarm.
The site, www.nortons.com , but gave over more to rumour and myth despite my best pursuits..

The gentle- man I chased up was one "Dynodave" who has his own Biz and website, but at that point he had no positive resolve.
But it does sound feasible and a great inovation!..
Back to top
norbsa48503



Joined: 07 Apr 2004
Posts: 1034
Location: Flint, Michigan

PostPosted: Sat Jun 05, 2004 10:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As I see this problem of swing arm slop it is not really a failure of the bronze bushings so much but the lack of support were the shaft passes through the cradle. The cradle is just not up to the loads put on it. Lets say that the neddle convertion would fix all the lube problems and provide a life time of stable support. You still have the shaft passsing through this cradle that can't take the load and that is the thing to go after. I have about 3000 miles on a brand new swing arm, shaft and bushings and I am already feeling the slop develop in the cradle. a repair that could be carryied out without ripping it all down would be a good thing. Anyone got any bright ideas. norbsa
Back to top
debby



Joined: 15 Apr 2004
Posts: 898
Location: Boulder, CO

PostPosted: Tue Jun 08, 2004 7:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

How about those collars/lockscrews that Heinz Kegler developed? You can read about it on the NCNOC website. Go to www.nortonclub.com, click on Tech Articles, and read Swing Arm Repair. Sounds to me like that would solve the problem and all you have remove is the rear wheel.

Debby
Back to top
norbsa48503



Joined: 07 Apr 2004
Posts: 1034
Location: Flint, Michigan

PostPosted: Tue Jun 08, 2004 7:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes that repair can be done many different ways. Since I had it all apart any way I choose to do the welded modification. I am talking about something else here. It's were the now stabilized swing arm shaft passes through the cradle and the egging out of those holes. This is why over size swing arm shafts are offered not for the swing arm repair but for cradle repair. norbsa
Back to top
bill



Joined: 01 Jun 2003
Posts: 135
Location: Orlando Fl/Shady Valley Tn.

PostPosted: Wed Jun 09, 2004 3:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

norbsa I am NOT fond of the nuts welded on bodge. if you look at the stress that is put on the tube in such a small area such as the weld than the split collers look nuch better. the load is transfered to the frount of the tube and a MUCH larger area along with opposing forces on the tube now. I seen that clubman racing will be offering a swingarm that is made out of oval tubing and uses 2 ballbearings on each side insteed of the bushes.

bill
Back to top
norbsa48503



Joined: 07 Apr 2004
Posts: 1034
Location: Flint, Michigan

PostPosted: Wed Jun 09, 2004 8:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes Bill it's a better fix no douwt. But it was not around when I did my Bikes. So I just did what the tech digest said. I was able to get the slop out of my rig today by dropping the oil filter assm. and snugging up those screws. I was just fishing for someone who may have come up with a way to put in some hardened bushings into the thin cradle so I could fix it for longer time . norbsa
Back to top
bill



Joined: 01 Jun 2003
Posts: 135
Location: Orlando Fl/Shady Valley Tn.

PostPosted: Thu Jun 10, 2004 3:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

norbsa the better way to fix it if you had the time and resores would be to make a jig to mount the plates in than cut out the tube, oversize the holes and put in a LOT thicker wall and harder tube. but the real problem as i see it was the support was WAY to narrow to start with. if the primary was not in the way outriggers for the pin would shurly be a BIG help to.

bill
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Norton Commando Forum Index -> Norton Commando Motorcycles. All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

The Unapproachable Norton Commando

At the end of 1967 the Norton Commando was announced.

The Norton Commando was greeted with a certain amount of scepticism because on first sight the commando appeared to comprise of the old Norton Dominator twin cylinder engine mounted at an inclined angle in a set of new cylinder parts.

It was not realized that the new Norton Commando Isolastic method of engine suspension damped out all engine vibration and produced a machine which had uncanny smoothness for a vertical twin. In due course the critics were silenced and the Norton Commando had the distinction of being regarded as the first of todays so called superbikes. There can be little doubt that the original design concept of the Norton Commando has proved correct, since comparatively few modifications of any real consequence have been made since production commenced during 1968.

Now nearly 40 years later Norton Commando riders like us are a breed of our own, and as far as we are concerned its still more fun to go for a blat on the old Norton Commando, and fast. As a Norton Commando owner and enthusiast, my goal here is to promote and give credit to those who keep the Norton name going.

It is more deserving to give credit to the Commando itself, for after all these years it continues to be respected. The original Commando designers like John Favill are those who deserve the credit for developing this incredible motorcycle.

The Norton Commando Roadster and Interstate of the late seventies, never died. Although the Norton Villiers factory dispersed the tradition lived on. Today Kenny Dreer in the USA is developing the new 952 CC Norton. What a great looking bike this is, and its engineering is still based on the original layout. It will be interesting to see how the new 952CC Norton does in todays tough motorcycle market. One thing is for sure, I would own one if I could afford it.