Crank End Play

This Forum is for Norton Commando Motorcycle related topics.

Crank End Play

Postby CDubb » Fri Feb 03, 2012 4:38 pm

I've stumbled upon this article,

http://www.oldbritts.com/ob_start.html

Which specifies that there should be between 0.005" and 0.010" in end play on crank when installing super blend bearings. I have since installed those bearings with the OEM spacer on drive side. This spacer stayed in the engine casing as, during the dismantle, was found pretty well seized to the casing (almost moulded into the casing). I have measured he end play to be approx. 0.001" but that could be error as the engine casing may have moved in a "moment-arm" fashion by only having the base clamped in a vice. Either way, you could base this as no end play in the crank. Keep in mind that I had no welseal or yamabond between the casings. Is it possible that the liquid gasket may take up approx 0.004"-0.005"?

In reference to the Mick Hemming Vid, he does not even look or mention the aspect of thermal expansion in this case.

If this is an issue, I may have to get the spacer milled out. I don't want to mangle the bearing housing with a chisel.
CDubb
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 7:20 am
Location: New Brunswick, Canada

Re: Crank End Play

Postby pvisseriii » Fri Feb 03, 2012 4:58 pm

Is this the spacer of which you speak? This is actually a machined rise in the casing.
I was also able to straddle a 1" mic in there and measure .159" of wall thinkness.

Not that any of this will be helpful, practically speaking, but I might help access your situation.

Image

Here's the timing side.
Image
Last edited by pvisseriii on Fri Feb 03, 2012 5:11 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Nortons, when they're right, they're righteous!
72 Commando Combat Roadster
Frame 149xxx,
Crankcase 210XXX
Gearbox 235xxx
and they all "match" up perfectly.
User avatar
pvisseriii
 
Posts: 2111
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 4:24 pm
Location: GR Michigan

Re: Crank End Play

Postby Matt Spencer » Fri Feb 03, 2012 5:02 pm

If the Ball Race ones spun bearings or shafts it would be indicative of differential expansion , like the P U Triumphs .Thermal Shock with the Butane torch and
a wrung out wet rag , on the SPACER . Wear Gloves.Two or three goes , Stareing at it , with intent . :|(First verifieing there is in fact one in there . :|

Were there shims behind the Bearing , on the shaft .
The one rule to the exception , is theres the exeption to each rule .
User avatar
Matt Spencer
 
Posts: 1466
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 6:30 am
Location: Upright

Re: Crank End Play

Postby CanukNortonNut » Fri Feb 03, 2012 5:06 pm

Charles
I am not sure what you are on about with the spacer as well???? You had a roller bearing on the timing side. 1970-71 engine cases? Is this what you are refering to?
CNN
Sadly, artificial intelligence will probably never be a match for natural stupidity... Rocketboy
CanukNortonNut
 
Posts: 312
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 9:36 pm
Location: Ontario West Lincoln Ontario

Re: Crank End Play

Postby 79x100 » Fri Feb 03, 2012 5:11 pm

I think that you've got to have the cases fully bolted up with dummy spacers to accurately measure end play. No joint sealant worthy of the name should alter clearances when assembled.

I've never come across an engine assembled by factory or an ordinary dealer with any shims in but none had less than 0.025" - 0.030" end-float.

I would suspect inner races not fully home on the crank or more likely an outer with a sliver of aluminium behind it. (Unless you're trying to fit a MkIII crank into earlier cases !)
1975 850 MkIII
1939 WD16H
Compulsive tinkerer.
User avatar
79x100
 
Posts: 1408
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 2:25 pm
Location: Flanders/ UK if there's a jumble on.

Re: Crank End Play

Postby CDubb » Fri Feb 03, 2012 5:14 pm

Yes pv, this is what I am referring to. I guess it is not the spacer I saw in the schematics I was looking at.

But my question really boils down to during a bearing replacement job does one take into account or even verifies end play in the crank as per the article above? In my case I do not have end play and no way of alleviating it unless I machine the bearing housings in the case. If I choose to ignore the end play, having none, will this hurt me in the long run?
CDubb
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 7:20 am
Location: New Brunswick, Canada

Re: Crank End Play

Postby 79x100 » Fri Feb 03, 2012 5:17 pm

CDubb wrote: If I choose to ignore the end play, having none, will this hurt me in the long run?


"No" end play is probably not achievable. 'Some" end play is OK but pre-load is definitely a bad thing and will cause expensive noises in short order..
1975 850 MkIII
1939 WD16H
Compulsive tinkerer.
User avatar
79x100
 
Posts: 1408
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 2:25 pm
Location: Flanders/ UK if there's a jumble on.

Re: Crank End Play

Postby pvisseriii » Fri Feb 03, 2012 5:21 pm

CDubb wrote:Yes pv, this is what I am referring to. I guess it is not the spacer I saw in the schematics I was looking at.

But my question really boils down to during a bearing replacement job does one take into account or even verifies end play in the crank as per the article above? In my case I do not have end play and no way of alleviating it unless I machine the bearing housings in the case. If I choose to ignore the end play, having none, will this hurt me in the long run?


Yikes! Something seems amiss. FWIW, if you had any shims, unless previously rebuilt, they would have more than likely been on the crank side. Thank goodness there's planty of winter left. :)
Nortons, when they're right, they're righteous!
72 Commando Combat Roadster
Frame 149xxx,
Crankcase 210XXX
Gearbox 235xxx
and they all "match" up perfectly.
User avatar
pvisseriii
 
Posts: 2111
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 4:24 pm
Location: GR Michigan

Re: Crank End Play

Postby CDubb » Fri Feb 03, 2012 5:23 pm

Well I have clean the bearing housing thoroughly and I have also checked the inner bearing races for clearance between the crank and the race. I was unable for fir a 0.001" shim between both. I would not surprise me that the crank could be a MKIII crank as this was a basket case.... still unlikely. How can I verify this?


Pre-load may be possible but the crank rotates smooth as a whistle so I'm no longer certain what is going on... the outer races should be seated correctly. Should I try to fit a shim between the outer race and the casing? It seems like the most logical #1 step in the troubleshooting realm.
CDubb
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 7:20 am
Location: New Brunswick, Canada

Re: Crank End Play

Postby Matt Spencer » Fri Feb 03, 2012 5:30 pm

That'd close it . Id aim for 6 thou . The Races are suosed to be pressed in , Case Warmed . To ensure theyre seated firmly .
Got a Drill Press ? warm case in oven ,
A desperado could lap a Iota or two of the Outer Race .
Wet & Dry paper on Glass , or Paste . and a few Burbons , or is it CoaCoa for patiance & a Steady Hand / Foot .
The one rule to the exception , is theres the exeption to each rule .
User avatar
Matt Spencer
 
Posts: 1466
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 6:30 am
Location: Upright

Re: Crank End Play

Postby pvisseriii » Fri Feb 03, 2012 5:33 pm

CDubb, I am under the impression that you are .010 to .015 too tight. You need more clearance, not less.

When checking play, pop the crank back and forth a little with hard wood and a mallet to see if this gives a few more thou. If so, call it good and use the best oil money can buy.
If not, you will have to decide if it is worth worring about when you should be thinking about your invisibility in traffic.
Nortons, when they're right, they're righteous!
72 Commando Combat Roadster
Frame 149xxx,
Crankcase 210XXX
Gearbox 235xxx
and they all "match" up perfectly.
User avatar
pvisseriii
 
Posts: 2111
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 4:24 pm
Location: GR Michigan

Re: Crank End Play

Postby CanukNortonNut » Fri Feb 03, 2012 5:35 pm

CDubb wrote:Well I have clean the bearing housing thoroughly and I have also checked the inner bearing races for clearance between the crank and the race. I was unable for fir a 0.001" shim between both. I would not surprise me that the crank could be a MKIII crank as this was a basket case.... still unlikely. How can I verify this?


Pre-load may be possible but the crank rotates smooth as a whistle so I'm no longer certain what is going on... the outer races should be seated correctly. Should I try to fit a shim between the outer race and the casing? It seems like the most logical #1 step in the troubleshooting realm.

The serial # on drive side should date the case.
CNN
Sadly, artificial intelligence will probably never be a match for natural stupidity... Rocketboy
CanukNortonNut
 
Posts: 312
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 9:36 pm
Location: Ontario West Lincoln Ontario

Re: Crank End Play

Postby 79x100 » Fri Feb 03, 2012 5:37 pm

If you've assembled the cases with new bearings and especially if you've used bearing-fit then you might find that the bearings are a little tight and don't allow you to measure the end-float once cool.

I don't believe that you can close the case if a MkIII crank is used. Generally, an original MkIII crank has a machined slot in the timing side cheek but I have seen them without.
1975 850 MkIII
1939 WD16H
Compulsive tinkerer.
User avatar
79x100
 
Posts: 1408
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 2:25 pm
Location: Flanders/ UK if there's a jumble on.

Re: Crank End Play

Postby hobot » Fri Feb 03, 2012 5:38 pm

Highly recommend heating beyond high boiling point more oil smoke frying pan hot so old bearing just drops out and new frozen one slip right it first plop or can get trapped and need oil flash off above frying pan hot to remove, ugh.
Cranks pretty much self center by rods if room too when its swells.
Throw yourself at the ground and miss!
User avatar
hobot
 
Posts: 7686
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 6:59 pm
Location: Arkansas, Dixieland

Re: Crank End Play

Postby CDubb » Fri Feb 03, 2012 5:42 pm

What do you mean by "Bearing-Fit"?
Don't worry Hobot, I used an oxy-aceteline torch to head that baby up. Oil was coming out of the pours.. She was hot like the saturday night poll dancer after a few whiskey shots and beers
CDubb
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 7:20 am
Location: New Brunswick, Canada

Next

Return to Norton Commando Motorcycles.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest